Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vasektomie

  • Chapter
Andrologie

Zusammenfassung

Die ersten Vasektomien verlieren sich im Dunkel der Medizingeschichte. Sie wurden Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts durchwegs nicht aus Sterilisationsgründen, sondern unter anderen medizinischen Indikationen durchgeführt. Bei diesen frühen bekannt gewordenen Vasektomien herrschte die Ansicht vor, es könnten mittels der Durchtrennung der Samenleiter Prostataerkrankungen gebessert, Impotenz geheilt oder eine Lebensverlängerung erzielt werden. Die Vasektomie wurde regelrecht im Sinne eines „Jungbrunnens“ propagiert (Isnardi 1896; Wolfers u. Wolfers 1974).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alderman PM (1991) Complications in a series of 1224 vasectomies. J Fam Pract 33:579–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Awsare NS, Krishnan J, Boustead GB, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA (2005) Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:406–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barone MA, Johnson CH, Luick MA, Teutonico DL, Magnani RJ (2004) Characteristics of men receiving vasectomies in the United States, 1998–1999. Persps Sex Reprod Health 36:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belker AM, Thomas AJ, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID (1991) Result of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the vasovasostomy study group. J Urol 145:505–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bensyl DM, luliano DA, Carter M, Santelli J, Gilbert BC (2002) Contraceptive use — United States and territories, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 54:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal-Delgado E, Latour-Pérez J, Pradas-Arnal F, Gómez-López LI (1998) The association between vasectomy and prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril 70:191–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertero E, Hallak J, Gromatzky C, Lucon AM, Arap S (2005) Assessment of sexual function in patients undergoing vasectomy using the international index of erectile function. Int Braz J Urol 31:452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook LA, Pun A, van Vliet H, Gallo MF, Lopez LM (2007a) Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD 4112

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook LA, van Vliet H, Lopez LM, Pun A, Gallo MF (2007b) Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD 3991

    Google Scholar 

  • Cos LR, Valvo JR, Davis RS, Cockett ATK (1983) Vasovasostomy: current state of the art. Urology 22:567–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deindl F (1990) Die Refertilisationssituation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Republik Österreich und der Schweiz — eine Dreiländerumfrage. Inaugural-Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrick FC, Yarbbrough W, Agostino JD (1973) Vasovasostomy: results of questionnaire of members of the American Urological Association. J Urol 110:556–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Djerassi C, Leibo SP (1994) A new look at male contraception. Nature 370:11–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake MJ, Mills IW, Cranston D (1999) On the chequered history of vasectomy. Brit J Urol International 84:475–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehn BE, Liljestrand J (1997) Female and male sterilization in Sweden. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 44:182–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann UH, Schramek P, Tomamichel G, Deindl F, Senge TH (1990) Vasectomy reversal in central Europe: results of a questionnaire of urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. J Urol 143:64–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farley TMM; Meirik O, Mehta S, Waites GMH (1993) The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 71:413–419

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feber KM, Ruiz HE (1999) Vasovasostomy: Macroscopic approach and retrospective review. Techniques in Urology 5:8–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forste R, Tanfer K, Tedrow L (1995) Sterilization among currently married men in the United States, 1991. Fam Plann Perspect 27:100–107, 122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanucci E, Tosteson TD, Speizer FE, Vessey MP, Colditz GA (1992) A long-term study of mortality in men who have undergone vasectomy. N Engl J Med 326:1392–1398

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC (1993) A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. JAMA 269:873–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel P, Ortmann K, Blattner TH (1987) Vasektomie und Beziehungssituation — eine empirische Untersuchung an 156 Männern (Paaren). Zschr Psychosom Med 33:119–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M (1983) Vasectomy failure using an open-ended technique. Fertil Steril 40:699–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M, Shihua PhL, Matthews GJ (1998) Microsurgical Vasovasostomy: The microdot technique of precision suture placement. J Urol 159:188–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich A, Bonfig R, Wilbert DM, Strohmaier WL, Engelmann UH (1994) Risk factors for antispermantibodies in infertile men. Am J Reprod Immunol 31:69–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Neubauer S, Engelmann UH (2000) Die mikrochirurgische Vasovasostomie im Zeitalter der modernen Reproduktionsmedizin — eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse. Urologe A 39:240–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC (1999) Sterilization and its consequences. Obstet Gynecol Surv 54:766–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hiersche HD, Hiersche F (1995) Die Sterilisation geistig Behinderter. Gynäkologe 28:452–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holden CA, McLachlan RI, Cumming R, Wittert G, Handelsman DJ, de Kretser DM, Pitts M (2005) Sexual activity, fertility and contraceptive use in middle-aged and older men: Men in Australia, Telephone Survey (MATeS). Hum Reprod 20:3429–3434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isnardi L (1896) Die Behandlung der senilen Dysurie mit Durchschneidung und doppelseitiger Ligatur der vasa deferentia. Therap Wschr 111:25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jequier AM, Pryor JP (1998) Is vasectomy of long term benefits? Hum Reprod 13:1757–1760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John EM, Whittemore AS, Wu AH, Kolonel LN, Hislop TG, Howe GR, West DW, Hankin J, Dreon DM, Teh CZ (1995) Vasectomy and prostate cancer: results from a multiethnic case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:662–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli KL (1973) Motivational factors and socioeconomic characteristics of vasectomized males. J Biosoc Sci 5:169–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labreque M, Dufresne C, Barone MA, St-Hilaire K (2004) Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review. BMC Medicine 2:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesko SM, Louik C, Vezina R, Rosenberg L, Shapiro S (1999) Vasectomy and prostate cancer. J Urol 161:1848–1853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynge E (2002) Prostate cancer is not increased in men with vasectomy in denmark. J Urol 168:488–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manson JE, Ridker PM, Spelsberg A, Ajani U, Lotufo PA, Hennekens CH (1999) Vasectomy and subsequent cardiovascular disease is US physicians. Contraception 59:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin K, Wu Z (2000) Contraceptive use in Canada. Fam Plann Perspect 32:65–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miltsch B, Senn E (1999) Vasektomie: Präoperative Bedenken und postoperative Akzeptanz. Akt Urol 30:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaee N, Mirahmadizadeh AR, Gorji HA, Mohammadi M (2002) Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 8:55–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (1993) Does vasectomy cause prostate cancer? JAMA 269:2620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieschlag E (1987) Vasektomie — pro und contra. Dtsch med Wschr 112:1107–1109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nirapathpongporn A, Huber DH, Krieger JN (1990) No-scalpel vasectomy at the King’s birthday vasectomy festival. Lancet 335: 894–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner AJ (1899) Surgical treatment of habitual criminals. JAMA 33:867–868

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor VJ (1948) Anastomosis of the vas deferens after purposeful division for sterility. J Urol 59:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozvaris SB, Dogan BG, Akin A (1998) Male involvement in family planning in Turkey. World Health Forum 19:76–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randall PE, Marcuson RW (1985) Absence from work following vasectomy. J Soc Occup Med 35:77–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RD (1994) Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy. J Fam Pract 39:577–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi SAH, Naqvi SAA, Hussain Z (1995) Ethical issues in male sterilization in developing countries. Brit J Urol 76:103–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands S, Hannaford P (2003) The incidence of sterilisation in the UK. BJOG 110:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross JA, Huber DH (1983) Acceptance and prevalence of vasectomy in developing countries. Stud Fam Plan 14:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth S, Hertle L (1994) Verursacht die Sterilisations-Vasektomie ein Prostatakarzinom? Dr Arztebl 91:409–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirren C (1983) Erfahrungen mit der Vasektomie. Urologe A 22:29–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwingl PJ, Guess HA (2000) Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril 73:923–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp HC (1902) The severing of the vasa deferentia and its relation to the neuropsychopathic constitution. NY Med J 75:411–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber SJ (1977) Perfect anatomical reconstruction of vas deferens with a new microscopic surgical technique. Fertil Steril 28:72–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GL, Taylor GP, Smith KF (1985) Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization. Am J Pub Health 75:370–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg FA, Burkman RT, Hagerty CG, Speroff L, Speroff T (2004) Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods. Contraception 69:447–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell J, Hatcher RA, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kost K (1990) Contraceptive failure in the United States: an update. Stud Fam Plan 21:51–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn R (1979) Behavioral response to vasectomy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:815–821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidner W, Weißbach L (1992) Freiwillige Vasektomie in der Familienplanung — Gedanken zur Nutzen-Risiko-Analyse. Akt Urol 23:328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund R, Alexander NJ (1979) Vasovasostomy: Evaluation of success. Urology 13:532–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers D, Wolfers H (1974) Vasectomy and vasectomania. Mayflower Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright N, Johnson B, Wiggins P, Vessey M (1977) The use of sterilisation as a method of birth control among participants in the Oxford/Family Planning Association Contraceptive Study. Fertil Contracept 1:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaozhang L, Shungiang L (1993) Vasal sterilization in China. Contraception 48:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9, 50924, Köln

    Prof. Dr. med. Udo H. Engelmann & Dr. med. Oliver Gralla

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. Udo H. Engelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med. Oliver Gralla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagkstr. 11, 48149, Münster

    Eberhard Nieschlag  & Susan Nieschlag M.A.  & 

  2. Zentrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str.40, 06120, Halle

    Hermann M. Behre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelmann, U.H., Gralla, O. (2009). Vasektomie. In: Nieschlag, E., Behre, H.M., Nieschlag, S. (eds) Andrologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92963-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92963-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92962-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92963-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation