Abstract
In this paper we analyze the capability of two different signal synchronization measures to detect synchronized periodic signal components. We compare the periodic synchronization index (PSI), which was first introduced for the detection of epileptic seizures in EEG signals, with the widely known phase locking value (PLV). The PSI automatically detects the dominant periodic signal components utilizing Fourier series expansions and measures the synchronization between equivalent components in two signals. The PLV averages the difference between the analytic phases of two signals. Applying these two measures to synthetic data and EEG recordings we found clear advantages of the PSI over the PLV. Experiments with synthetic data and high signal to noise ratio (SNR) revealed no significant difference between the PSI and the PLV in their ability to detect small frequency deviations. However, in the presence of noise the detection performance of the PLV drops significantly. In particular, we found that the PLV relies on an SNR of nearly 3dB. In contrast, the performance with the PSI remained almost unchanged for SNR down to -4dB. This noise robustness of the PSI is due to the incorporation of harmonic oscillations resulting in an improved estimation of periodic signal components. When applied to the detection of early seizure phenomena in EEG data we found that the increase of the PSI at seizure onset is more pronounced and the variance of the measure during pre-ictal time periods is lower than for the PLV.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. P. Lachaux, E. Rodriguez, J. Martinerie, and F. J. Varela, “Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals.” Hum Brain Mapp, Vol. 8(4), pp. 194–208, 1999
M. Le Van Quyen, J. Foucher, J. Lachaux, E. Rodriguez, A. Lutz, J. Martinerie and FJ. Varela, “Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony”, J Neurosci Methods, Vol. 111(2), pp. 83–98, 2001
M. Chávez, M. Le Van Quyen, V. Navarro, M. Baulac, and J. Martinierie, “Spatio-temporal dynamics prior to neocortical seizures: Amplitude versus phase couplings”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 50(5), pp. 571–583, 2003
E. Gysels and P. Celka, “Phase Synchronization for the Recognition of Mental Tasks in a Brain-Computer Interface”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 12(4), pp. 406–415, 2004
A. Bruns, “Fourier-, Hilbert-and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches?”, J Neurosci Methods, Vol. 137(2), pp. 321–332, 2004
R. Quian Quiroga, A. Kraskov, T. Kreuz, and P. Grassberger, “Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals”, Phys Rev E, Vol. 65, 041903, 2002
E. Gysels, M. Le Van Quyen, J. Martinerie, P. Boon, K. Vonck, I. Lemahieu and R. Van De Walle, “Long-term evaluation of synchronization between scalp EEG signals in partial epilepsy,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Vol.3, pp. 1495–1498, 2002
H. Perko, C. Baumgartner, and T. Kluge, “Epileptic Seizure Detection Utilizing a Novel Feature Sensitive to Synchronization and Energy”, Epilepsia, Vol. 48(6), pp. 190–191, 2007
H. Perko, M. Hartmann, K. Schindler and T. Kluge, “A novel synchronization measure for epileptic seizure detection based on Fourier series expansions”, Proceedings of the 4th European Conference of the IFMBE, in press
P. Tass, M. G. Rosenblum, J. Weule, J. Kurths, A. Pikovsky, J. Volkmann, A. Schnitzler, and H. J. Freund, “Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: Application to magnetoencephalography”, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, pp. 3291–3294, 1998
M. Chavez, M. Besserve, C. Adam, and J. Martinerie, “Towards a proper estimation of phase synchronization from time series”, J Neurosci Methods, Vol. 154, pp. 149–160, 2006
P. Celka, “Statistical Analysis of the Phase-Locking Value”, IEEE Signal Proc. Letters, Vol. 14(9), pp. 577–580, 2007
F. Mormann, K. Lehnertz, P. David, and C. E. Elger, “Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients”, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol. 144(3), pp. 358–369, 2000
A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, “Signals and Systems”, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA, 1996
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Perko, H., Hartmann, M., Kluge, T. (2009). A Comparison of Two Synchronization Measures for Neural Data. In: Lim, C.T., Goh, J.C.H. (eds) 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92840-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92841-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)