Composite PLDLLA/TCP Scaffolds for Bone Engineering: Mechanical and In Vitro Evaluations

Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 23)


Bone tissue engineering scaffolds have two challenging functional tasks to play; to be bioactive by encouraging cell proliferation and differentiation, and to provide suitable mechanical stability upon implantation. Composites of biopolymers and bioceramics unite the advantages of both materials resulting in better processibility, enhanced mechanical properties through matrix reinforcement and osteoinductivity. Novel composite blends of poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide)/tricalcium phosphate (PLDLLA/TCP) were fabricated into scaffolds by an extrusion deposition technique customised from standard rapid prototyping technology. PLDLLA/TCP composite material blends of various compositions were prepared and analysed for their mechanical properties. PLDLLA/TCP (10%) was optimised and fabricated into scaffolds. Compressive mechanical properties for the composite scaffolds were performed. In vitro studies were conducted using porcine bone-marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Cell-scaffold constructs were induced using osteogenic induction factors for up to 8 weeks. Cell proliferation, viability and differentiation capabilities were assayed using phase contrast light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, PicoGreen DNA quantification, AlamarBlue metabolic assay; FDA/PI fluorescent assay and western blot analysis for osteopontin. Microscopy observations showed BMSCs possessed high proliferative capabilities and demonstrated bridging across the pores of the scaffolds. FDA/PI staining as well as AlamarBlue assay showed high viability of BMSCs cultured on the composite scaffolds Cell numbers, based on DNA quantitation, was observed to increase continuously up to the 8th week of study. Western blot analysis showed increased osteopontin synthesis on the scaffolds compared to tissue culture plastic. Based on our results the PLDLLA/TCP scaffolds exhibit good potential and biocompatibility for bone tissue engineering applications.


Composite bioresorbable scaffolds PLDLLA tissue engineering bone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000 Dec;21(24):2529–2543.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Lam CX, Tan KC, Lim TC. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 2007 Jul–Aug;1(4):245–260.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chu TM, Orton DG, Hollister SJ, Feinberg SE, Halloran JW. Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures. Biomaterials 2002 Mar;23(5):1283–1293.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Groot JH, Kuijper HW, Pennings AJ. A novel method for fabrication of biodegradable scaffolds with high compression moduli. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine 1997 Nov;8(11):707–712.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishaug SL, Crane GM, Miller MJ, Yasko AW, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 1997 Jul;36(1):17–28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramay HR, Zhang M. Biphasic calcium phosphate nanocomposite porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004 Sep;25(21):5171–5180.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chistolini P, Ruspantini I, Bianco P, Corsi A, Cancedda R, Quarto R. Biomechanical evaluation of cell-loaded and cell-free hydroxyapatite implants for the reconstruction of segmental bone defects. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999 Dec;10(12):739–742.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schumann D, Ekaputra AK, Lam CXF, and Hutmacher DW. Biomaterials/ Scaffolds — Design of Bioactive, Multiphasic PCL/collagen Type I and Type II — PCL-TCP/collagen Composite Scaffolds for Functional Tissue Engineering of Osteochondral Repair Tissue by Using Electrospinning and FDM Techniques. In: Hauser H, Fussenegger M, editors. Tissue Engineering (Methods in Molecular Medicine). 2nd ed. New Jersey: Humana Press, 2007. p. 101–124.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim HW. Biomedical nanocomposites of hydroxyapatite/ polycaprolactone obtained by surfactant mediation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007 Mar 27.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liao S, Wang W, Uo M, Ohkawa S, Akasaka T, Tamura K, et al. A three-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2005 Dec;26(36):7564–7571.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou YF, Hutmacher DW, Varawan SL, Lim TM. In vitro bone engineering based on polycaprolactone and polycaprolactonetricalcium phosphate composites. Polym Int 2007 Mar;56(3):333–342.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I, Ng KW, Teoh SH, Tan KC. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res 2001 May;55(2):203–216.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2002 Feb;23(4):1169–1185.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Athanasiou KA, Zhu C, Lanctot DR, Agrawal CM, Wang X. Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Eng 2000 Aug;6(4):361–381.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lam CXF, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW. Comparison of Degradation of PCL & PCL-TCP scaffolds in Alkaline Medium. Polym Int 2007;56(6):718–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties 2nd ed ed: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomson RC, Yaszemski MJ, Powers JM, Mikos AG. Fabrication of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds to Engineer Trabecular Bone. Journal of Biomaterials Science-Polymer Edition 1995;7(1):23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BioengineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Biophysics and Human PhysiologyMedical University of WarsawPoland
  3. 3.Faculty of Materials Science and EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyPoland
  4. 4.Temasek Engineering SchoolTemasek PolytechnicSingapore
  5. 5.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  6. 6.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  7. 7.Division of Regenerative Medicine, IHBIQueensland University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations