Multiobjective Optimization, Systems Design and De Novo Programming

Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 103)

Abstract

In this chapter we explore some topics beyond traditional MCDM. First we explain in the simplest possible terms what multiobjective optimization is, and define the subject matter of this chapter. We discuss the role of tradeoffs and draw a distinction between tradeoffs-based versus tradeoffs-free thinking. Next, we introduce the concept of optimization and optimal systems design. Then we build the foundation of De novo programming, dealing with designing optimal systems in linear cases. Finally, we provide some numerical examples and discuss additional applications where optimal design and multiobjective optimization can be used.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Colson and M. Zeleny. Uncertain Prospects Ranking and Portfolio Analysis under the Conditions of Partial Information. Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Hessel and M. Zeleny. Optimal system design: Towards new interpretation of shadow prices in linear programming. Computers and Operations Research, 14(4):265–271, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.C. Koopmans. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Wiley, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Lerner. Managerial Finance. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Markowitz. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1):77–91, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Markowitz. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.E. Porter. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, pages 61–78, 1996. November- December.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Shi. Studies on optimum-path ratios in De Novo programming problems. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 29:43–50, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Shi, D.L. Olson, and A. Stam. Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management: Knowledge and Wisdom. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.A. Simon. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69:99- 118,1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.A. Simon. Administrative Behavior. The Free Press, New York, 3rd edition, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Zeleny. Compromise programming. In J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pages 263–301. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Zeleny. The theory of the displaced ideal. In M. Zeleny, editor, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pages 153–206. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Zeleny. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Zeleny. Optimal system design with multiple criteria: De Novo programming approach. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 10:89–94, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Zeleny. Information Technology in Business. Thomson, London, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Zeleny. The evolution of optimality: De Novo programming. In C.A. Coello Coello, A. Hern ández Aguirre, and E. Zitzler, editors, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 1–13. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Zeleny. Human Systems Management: Integrating Knowledge, Management and Systems. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Zeleny. The KM-MCDM interface in decision design: Tradeoffs-free conflict dissolution. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1):3–23, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations