What Is an Ontology?

Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Summary

The word “ontology” is used with different senses in different communities. The most radical difference is perhaps between the philosophical sense, which has of course a well-established tradition, and the computational sense, which emerged in the recent years in the knowledge engineering community, starting from an early informal definition of (computational) ontologies as “explicit specifications of conceptualizations”. In this paper we shall revisit the previous attempts to clarify and formalize such original definition, providing a detailed account of the notions of conceptualization and explicit specification, while discussing at the same time the importance of shared explicit specifications.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues Aldo Gangemi, Susan Marie Thomas, Marta Sabou, as well as Pascal Hitzler for their fruitful reviews and discussions that helped to shape this contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies. PhD thesis, Institute for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Carnap. Meaning and Necessity – A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. The University of Chicago Press, second edition, 1956.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. K. Das. Deductive Databases and Logic Programming. Addison Wesley, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. R. Dowty, R. Wall, and S. Peters. Introduction to Montague Semantics, volume 11 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer, Heidelberg, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. R. Genesereth and N. J. Nilsson. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. R. Gruber. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In N. Guarino and R. Poli, editors, Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Deventer, The Netherlands, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. R. Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199–220, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. R. Gruber. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(5–6):907–928, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Guarino and P. Giaretta. Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification. In N. Mars, editor, Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, pages 25–32. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Guarino. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In N. Guarino, editor, Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, June 6-8, 1998, pages 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Hendler. Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):30–37, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London, tenth edition, 1923.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Øhrstrøm, J. Andersen, and H. Schärfe. What has happened to ontology. In F. Dau, M.-L. Mugnier, and G. Stumme, editors, Conceptual Structures: Common Semantics for Sharing Knowledge, 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2005, Kassel, Germany, July 17–22, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3596 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 425–438. Springer, Heidelberg, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Smith. Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation. In A. C. Varzi and L. Vieu, editors, Formal Ontology in Information Systems – Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), pages 73–85. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Studer, R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2):161–198, 1998.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Swartout and A. Tate. Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1):18–19, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Uschold. Ontologies and Semantics for Seamless Connectivity. SIGMOD Record, 33(4):58–64, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. L. Vaught. Alfred Tarski's Work in Model Theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51(4):869–882, 1986.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITSC-CNRLaboratory for Applied OntologyTrentoItaly
  2. 2.SAP ResearchCEC KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
  3. 3.University of Koblenz-LandauISWebKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations