Skip to main content

Modeling Evolving Innovation Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation Networks

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

Economists widely agree on technological change and innovation being the main components of economic growth [Aghion and Howitt 1998, Tirole 1988]. In the absence of ongoing technological improvements, economic growth can hardly be maintained [Barro and Sala-i Martin 2004]. The close link between innovation and economic performance has become generally accepted. Following this insight, in recent years of economic growth, OECD countries have fostered investments in science, technology, and innovation[OECD 2006].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, Magnanti; Orlin (1993). Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization 4(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, L. A. N., Cizeau, P., Gopikrishnan, P., Liu, Y., Meyer, M., Peng, C.-K., Stanley, H. E. (1999). Econophysics: Can statistical physics contribute to the science of economics? Computer Physics Communications, 121(122), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, L., Gopikrishnan, P., Matia, K., Plerou, V., Stanley, H. (2001). Application of statistical physics methods and concepts to the study of science&technology systems. Scientometrics 51, 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (1996). Localized knowledge percolation processes and information networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 6(3), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton: Princeton U. Press. pp. 609–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., Tesfatsion, L. S. (2006). A Guide for Newcomers to Agent-Based Modeling in the Social Sciences. Staff General Research Papers 12515, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P., Sneppen, K. (1993). Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Physical Review Letters 71(24), 4083–4086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, V., Goyal, S. (2000). A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68(5), s1181–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, R., Ghosal, S. (2005). Irreducible economies and strongly connected graphs. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41(8), 937–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballester, C., Calvo-Armengol, A., Zenou, Y. (2006). Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player. Econometrica 74(5), 1403–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, S. (2003). Dynamics and Evolution of Complex Networks in Socio-Economical Systems. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Normale Superieure, Ecole Doctorale de Paris 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollobas, B. (1985). Random Graphs. Cambridge, NY: 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., Ockenfels, A. (2005). Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. Journal of Public Economics 89, 1457–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. The American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S. (2006). Linear Dynamical Systems. Lecture Notes, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. (1993). Differential Equations and Their Applications. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Ney York 4th edn. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. F., Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies “Engines of growth”? Journal of Econometrics 65(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayol, N., Roux, P. (2003). Self-Organizing Innovation Networks: When do Small Worlds Emerge? Working Papers of GRES – Cahiers du GRES 2003–8, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayol, N., Roux, P. (2005). A Strategic Model of Complex Networks Formation. Tech. rep., Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg and Universite Paris Sud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., Berger, R. L. (2001). Statistical Inference. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from belgium. The American Economic Review 92(4), 1169–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. (1995). Empirical Studies of Technological Activity. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., Stein, C. (2001). Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. F., Rodrigues, F. A., Travieso, G., Boas, P. V. (2007). Characterization of complex networks: A Survey of measurements, Arxiv preprint cond-mat/0505185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28(8), 1557–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., Jonard, N., Ozman, M. (2004). Knowledge dynamics in a network industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71(5), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhaut, J., Rustichini, A. (2001). Investment Game. Tech. rep. Forthcoming in the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences.Edited by Nature, available at the website:http://www.econ.umn.edu/arust/InvestmentGame\_9\_(1).Pdf

  • Dieckmann, A. (2004). The power of reciprocity: Fairness, reciprocity, and stakes in variants of the dictator game. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48(4), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (1999). How Can Statistical Mechanics Contribute to Social Science? Tech. rep., Wisconsin Madison – Social Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrett, R. A. (2004). Probability. Theory and Examples. Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M., Schuster, P. (1979). The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Berlin. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. D., Smith, E., Shubik, M. (2005). Economics: The next physical science? Arxiv preprint physics/0506086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 817–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K. (2006). Technological innovation and complexity theory. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J. (2000). Strategic Interaction and Markets. Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), Catholic University of Louvain: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati, M., Kirman, A. P. (eds.) (1999). Beyond the Representative Agent. Cheltenham, GL: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerosky, P. (1995). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., chap. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Selten, R. (eds.) (2002). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (Dahlem Workshop Reports). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsil, C. D., Royle, G. F. (2001). Algebraic Graph Theory. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. (2007). Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, T., Blasius, G. (2007). Adaptive Coevolutionary Networks – A Review. Eprint arXiv: 0709.1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, M., Roijakkers, N. (2006). Patterns In Inter-Firm R&D Networks in the Global Computer Industry: A Historical Analysis Of Major Developments During the Period 1970–1999. Paper presented at SPRU 40th Anniversary Conference – The Future of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, SPRU, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy 29(4–5), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, H., Kamphorst, J., Sarangi, S. (2007). (Non-)existence and scope of nash networks. Economic Theory 31, 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, H., Sarangi, S. (2005). Nash networks with heterogeneous links. Mathematical Social Sciences 50, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanaki, N., Nakajima, R., Ogura, Y. (2007). The Dynamics of R&D Collaboration in the IT Industry. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. (2003). Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. A., Johnson, C. R. (1990). Matrix Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, B., Glance, N. (1994). Beliefs and cooperation. Arxiv eprint arXiv: adap-org/9405001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O. (2003). A Survey of Models of Network Formation: Stability and Efficiency. Working Papers 1161, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O. (2006). Cambridge University Press. The Economics of Social Networks. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress. New York: vol. I

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2008). Social and Economic Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O., Watts, A. (2002). The Evolution of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory 106(2), 265–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O., Wolinsky, A. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory 71(1), 44–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Krishna, S. (1998a). Autocatalytic sets and the growth of complexity in an evolutionary model. Physical Review Letters 81(25), 5684–5687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Krishna, S. (1998b). Emergence and growth of complex networks in adaptive systems. E-print adap-org/9810005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Krishna, S. (2001). A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(2), 543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Krishna, S. (2002). Graph theory and the evolution of autocatalytic networks. Handbook of Graphs and Networks. Berlin: John Wiley and VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karshenas, M., Stoneman, P. (1995). Technological Diffusion. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, K. H. (1995). Nonlinear Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Wong, K.-C. (2007). Network formation and stable equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory 133, 536–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. (1997). The economy as an evolving network. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 7(4), 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, M. D., Battiston, S., Napoletano, M., Schweitzer, F., (2008a). Efficiency and stability of dynamic innovation networks, CER-ETH Working Paper No. 08/95, ETH Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, M. D., Battiston, S., Napoletano, M., Schweitzer, F. (2008b). On algebraic graph theory and the dynamics of innovation networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 3(2), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, S. (2003). Formation and Destruction of Autocatalytic Sets in an Evolving Network Model. Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institue of Science. E-print arxiv:nlin.AO/0403050 v1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. (2005). A Theory Based Dynamical Model of Innovation Processes. Tech. rep., Department of Political Economy, University of Modena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D., Maxfield, R. (1997). Foresight, Complexity and Strategy. Chapter in book: Economy As an Evolving Complex System II, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics L(2), 197–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, R. R. (1994). General Equilibrium and the theory of directed graphs. Journal of Mathematical Economics 27, 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1959). The simple economics of basic research. Journal of Political Economy 67, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2), 167–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M., Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393, 573–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M., Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437, 1291–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F. (1996). The Emergence of Simple Ecologies of Skill: A Hypercycle Approach to Economic Organization. Working Papers 96-08-053, Santa Fe Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F., Lee, D., Collier, N. (2003). Economic production as chemistry. Industrial Corporate Change 12(4), 843–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., Grodal, S. (2006). Oxford Handbook of Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press. chap. Networks of Innovators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricottilli, M. (2005). Firms and Network Formation Through the Transmission of Heterogeneous Knowledge. Tech. rep., Department of Economics, University of Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricottilli, M. (2006). Constraints and Freedom of Action: A Fitness Trade-Off.Tech. rep., Department of Economics, University of Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science 46(6), 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, D. (1957). On linear models and the graphs of minkowski-leontief matrices. Econometrica 25, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurabh, A., Cowan, R. (2004). The Growth of Knowledge and Complexity in an Evolving Network Model of Technological Innovation. Tech. rep., UNU-INTECH and MERIT, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. Paper presented at “Organisations, Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy”, 9th–10th September 2004, CRIC, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, A., Schweitzer, F. (2007). Aggregate behavior in an evolutionary network model. International Journal of Modern Physics C 18(10) 1659–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 35(7). 994–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, P., Schuster, P. (1996). Permanence of sparse autocatalytic networks. Mathematical Biosciences, 131(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, A. (ed.) (2001). Diskrete Strukturen 2.: Kombinatorik, Graphentheorie, Algebra. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, A., Schickinger, T. (eds.) (2001). Diskrete Strukturen 1.: Kombinatorik, Graphentheorie, Algebra. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Orgnization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1996). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Redondo, F. (2007). Complex Social Networks. Series: Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1987). Cooperation between Rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., Von Krogh, G. (2003). open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of conomics 113(2), 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Douglas, B. (2001). Introduction to Graph Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1975). Informational economics of scale. Bell Journal of Economics 6, 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenou, Y. (2006). Course on networks: Theory and applications. Lecture notes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. König .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

König, M.D., Battiston, S., Schweitzer, F. (2009). Modeling Evolving Innovation Networks. In: Pyka, A., Scharnhorst, A. (eds) Innovation Networks. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92267-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92267-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92266-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92267-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics