Bio-Inspired Multi-agent Collaboration for Urban Monitoring Applications

  • Uichin Lee
  • Eugenio Magistretti
  • Mario Gerla
  • Paolo Bellavista
  • Pietro Liò
  • Kang-Won Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5151)


Vehicular sensor networks (VSNs) provide a collaborative sensing environment where mobile vehicles equipped with sensors of different nature (from chemical detectors to still/video cameras) inter-work to implement monitoring applications such as traffic reporting, environment monitoring, and distributed surveillance. In particular, there is an increasing interest in proactive urban monitoring where vehicles continuously sense events from streets, autonomously process sensed data (e.g., recognizing license plates), and possibly route messages to vehicles in their vicinity to achieve a common goal (e.g., to permit police agents to track the movements of specified cars). MobEyes is a middleware solution to support VSN-based proactive urban monitoring applications, where the agents (e.g., police cars) harvest metadata from regular VSN-enabled vehicles. Since multiple agents collaborate in a typical urban sensing operation, it is critical to design a mechanism to effectively coordinate their operations to the area where new information is rich in a completely decentralized and lightweight way. We present a novel agent coordination algorithm for urban sensing environments that has been designed based on biological inspirations such as foraging, stigmergy, and Lévy flight. The reported simulation results show that the proposed algorithm enables the agents to move to “information patches” where new information concentration is high, and yet limits duplication of work due to simultaneous presence of agents in the same region.


Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET) Vehicular Sensor Networks (VSN) Bio-inspired Data Harvesting Multi-agent Coordination 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., Estrin, D.: Directed Diffusion: a Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks. In: ACM MOBICOM 2000, Boston, MA, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, U., Magistretti, E., Zhou, B., Gerla, M., Bellavista, P., Corradi, A.: MobEyes: Smart Mobs for Urban Monitoring with a Vehicular Sensor Network. IEEE Wireless Communications 13(5) (Septmber 2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hull, B., Bychkovsky, V., Chen, K., Goraczko, M., Miu, A., Shih, E., Zhang, Y., Balakrishnan, H., Madden, S.: CarTel: A Distributed Mobile Sensor Computing System. In: ACM SenSys, Boulder, CO, USA, October-November (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry for Optimization, Control and Automation. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, T., Jung, S., Cho, K.: Investigations into the Design Principles in the Chemotactic Behavior of Escherichia Coli. Biosystems (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levy, P.: Theorie de l’addition des variables aleatoires. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1954)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynolds, A.M., Frye, M.A.: Free-Flight Odor Tracking in Drosophila Is Consistent with an Optimal Intermittent Scale-Free Search. PLoS ONE 2(4) (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Complexity of Environment and Parsimony of Decision Rules in Insect Societies. Biol. Bull. 202(3), 268–274 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theraulaz, G., Bonbeau, E.: A Brief History of Stigmergy. Artificial Life 5(2), 97–116 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloom, B.H.: Space/Time Trade-offs in Hash Coding with Allowable Errors. CACM 13(7), 422–426 (1970)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grossglauser, M., Vetterli, M.: Locating Nodes with EASE: Mobility Diffusion of Last Encounters in Ad Hoc Networks. In: IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, CA, USA, March-April (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephens, D., Krebs, K.: Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, NJ (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson, D.E., Ratnieks, F.L.: Primer: Communications in Ants. Current Biology 16(15), 570–574 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M.G.E., Viswanathan, G.M., Catalan, J.: Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86, 3078–3087 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Viswanathan, G., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E.: Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401, 911–914 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bai, F., Sadagopan, N., Helmy, A.: The IMPORTANT Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing for Ad Hoc Networks. Ad Hoc Networks Journal - Elsevier 1, 383–403 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uichin Lee
    • 1
  • Eugenio Magistretti
    • 2
  • Mario Gerla
    • 1
  • Paolo Bellavista
    • 3
  • Pietro Liò
    • 4
  • Kang-Won Lee
    • 5
  1. 1.UCLAUK
  2. 2.Rice UniversityUK
  3. 3.University of BolognaUK
  4. 4.University of CambridgeUK
  5. 5.IBM ResearchUK

Personalised recommendations