Abstract
Given a set of observed economic choices, can one infer preferences and/or utility functions for the players that are consistent with the data? Questions of this type are called rationalization or revealed preference problems in the economic literature, and are the subject of a rich body of work.
From the computer science perspective, it is natural to study the complexity of rationalization in various scenarios. We consider a class of rationalization problems in which the economic data is expressed by a collection of matchings, and the question is whether there exist preference orderings for the nodes under which all the matchings are stable.
We show that the rationalization problem for one-one matchings is NP-complete. We propose two natural notions of approximation, and show that the problem is hard to approximate to within a constant factor, under both. On the positive side, we describe a simple algorithm that achieves a 3/4 approximation ratio for one of these approximation notions. We also prove similar results for a version of many-one matching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afriat, S.N.: The Construction of Utility Functions from Expenditure Data. International Economic Review 8(1), 67–77 (1967)
Beigman, E., Vohra, R.: Learning from revealed preference. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 36–42 (2006)
Dwork, C., Harsha, P.: Expanders in Computer Science (CS369E) – Lecture 5, Stanford University (2005)
Diewert, E.: Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory. Review of Economic Studies 40(3), 419–425 (1973)
Echenique, F.: What matchings can be stable? The testable implications of matching theory. Technical Report 1252, California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Papers (2006)
Echenique, F., Oviedo, J.: Core many-to-one matchings by fixed-point methods. Journal of Economic Theory 115(2), 358–376 (2004)
Echenique, F., Yenmez, M.B.: A solution to matching with preferences over colleagues. Games and Economic Behavior 59(1), 46–71 (2007)
Fleiner, T.: A fixed-point approach to stable matchings and some applications. Math. Oper. Res. 28(1), 103–126 (2003)
Fostel, A., Scarf, H.E., Todd, M.J.: Two new proofs of Afriat’s theorem. Economic Theory 24(1), 211–219 (2004)
Gale, D., Shapley, L.: College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69(1), 9–15 (1962)
Kalyanaraman, S., Umans, C.: The complexity of rationalizing matchings. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) (21) (2008)
Özsoy, H.: A characterization of Bird’s rule, Job market paper (2006)
Papadimitriou, C.H., Yannakakis, M.: Optimization, approximation, and complexity classes. Journal of Computing Systems and Sciences 43(3), 425–440 (1991)
Roth, A.E.: The economics of matchings: stability and incentives. Math Operations Research 7, 617–628 (1982)
Roth, A.E.: The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. Journal of Economic Theory 35, 277–288 (1985)
Roth, A.E., Sotomayor, M.A.: Two-sided matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis, 2nd edn. Econometric Society Monographs, vol. 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Samuelson, P.A.: Consumption Theory in terms of Revealed Preference. Economica 15(60), 243–253 (1948)
Sönmez, T.: Strategy-proofness in many-to-one matching problems. Economic Design 3, 365–380 (1996)
Sprumont, Y.: On the Testable Implications of Collective Choice Theories. Journal of Economic Theory 93, 205–232 (2000)
Sethuraman, J., Teo, C.-P., Tan, W.-P.: Gale-Shapley stable marriage revisited: strategic issues and applications. Management Science 47(9), 1252–1267 (2001)
Varian, H.R.: The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis. Econometrica 50(4), 945–973 (1982)
Varian, H.R.: Revealed Preference. In: Szenberg, M., Ramrattan, L., Gottesman, A.A. (eds.) Samuelson Economics and the Twenty-First Century, ch. 6, pp. 99–115. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Zwick, U.: Approximation algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems involving at most three variables per constraint. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 201–210. ACM-SIAM, New York (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kalyanaraman, S., Umans, C. (2008). The Complexity of Rationalizing Matchings. In: Hong, SH., Nagamochi, H., Fukunaga, T. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92182-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92182-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92181-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92182-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)