Abstract
Although modularized protocol frameworks are flexible and adaptive to the increasing heterogeneity of networking environments, it remains a challenge to automatically compose communication stacks from protocol modules. The typical static classification into network layers or class hierarchies cannot appropriately accommodate cross-cutting changes such as overlay routing or cross-layer signaling.
In this paper, we discuss how protocol composition can be driven by functionality and demand at runtime based on extensible semantic models of protocols and their execution environment. Such an approach allows to reason about the functionality and quality of automatically composed and adapted protocol compounds and it is open to existing and future protocols.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Muhugusa, M., Di Marzo, G., Tschudin, C.F., Harms, J.: ComScript: An Environment for the Implementation of Protocol Stacks and their Dynamic Reconfiguration. In: International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing (1994)
Hutchinson, N.C., Peterson, L.L.: The x-Kernel: An Architecture for Implementing Network Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17(1) (1991)
O’Malley, S.W., Peterson, L.L.: A Dynamic Network Architecture. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 10(2), 110–143 (1992)
Zitterbart, M., Stiller, B., Tantawy, A.N.: A Model for Flexible High-performance Communication Subsystems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 11(4), 507–518 (1993)
Plagemann, T., Vogt, M., Plattner, B., Walter, T.: Modules as Building Blocks for Protocol Configuration. In: 1993 International Conference on Network Protocols 1993. Proceedings, pp. 106–113 (1993)
Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.P.: Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 333–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Li, L., Horrocks, I.: A Software Framework for Matchmaking Based on Semantic Web Technology. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, pp. 331–339 (2003)
Wang, X.H., Zhang, D.Q., Gu, T., Pung, H.K.: Ontology Based Context Modeling and Reasoning Using OWL, 18–22 (2004)
Zhou, L., Pung, H.K., Ngoh, L.H., Gu, T.: Ontology Modeling of a Dynamic Protocol Stack. In: 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 353–360. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation (February 2004)
Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation (January 2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Götz, S., Beckel, C., Heer, T., Wehrle, K. (2008). ADAPT: A Semantics-Oriented Protocol Architecture. In: Hummel, K.A., Sterbenz, J.P.G. (eds) Self-Organizing Systems. IWSOS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5343. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92157-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92157-8_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92156-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92157-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)