Skip to main content

Prediction of Weight in Breast Reduction Surgery

  • Chapter
Mastopexy and Breast Reduction

Many studies showing the benefits of reduction mammaplasty have been reported; however, insurance companies have become more cost conscious and have made increasing efforts to deny this procedure. Spector and Karp [1] state that insurance companies often do not cover breast reductions that remove less than 1,000 g total (500 g of tissue from each side). However, their study shows that women who have less than 1,000 g of total weight removal, or even less than 750 g of totally removed, demonstrate “substantial relief of macromastia associated symptoms” and significant improvement in quality of life.

Seitchik and Schnur [2, 3] have recommended that the insurance companies base the minimum gram resection requirement on the patients weight and height rather than on an arbitrary number applied to all patients. Seitchik [2] found there was a correlation between body weight and a specimen weight of 0.68. He concluded that three levels of minimal volume resection should replace the one volume minimum. He proposed the weight resection correlations as follows: (1) Body weight less than 60 kg, 400 g resection. (2) Body weight 61–79 kg, 700 g resection. (3) Body weight >80 kg, 1,000 g resection. Schnur [3] gives percentiles of weight removal based on body surface area. The patient's body surface area, obtained by a graph of height and weight, determines the volume of breast tissue that must be removed to be above certain percentiles for all women having reductions. Below the fif h percentile is considered cosmetic, and above the 22nd percentile is considered medically necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spector J, Karp N: Reduction mammaplasty: a significant improvement at any size. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(4):845–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seitchik MW: Reduction mammaplasty: criteria for insurance coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95(6):1029–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schnur P, Schnur E, Petty PM, Hanson TJ, Weaver AL: Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(4):875–883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker H: Breast reduction insurance denials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(6):1687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldwyn RM: Breast reduction absurdum. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(1):246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schultz R, Dolezal R, Nolan J: Further application of Archimedes' principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts. Ann Plast Surg 1986;16(2):98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tezel E, Numanoglu A: Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105(3):1019–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouman F: Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1970;23(3):263–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkie T, Ship A: Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 1977;1:301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tegtmeier R: A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1978;1(6):625–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palin WE Jr, Fraunhofer J, Smith DJ Jr: Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77(2):253–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossman A, Roudner L: A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66(6):851–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI: Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Human Biol 1979;6(4):363–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G: Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30(2):129–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanhai R, Hage J: Bra cup size depends on band size. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(1):300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Westreich M: Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(2):468–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sigurdson L, Kirkland S: Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(2):313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Regnault P, Daniel RK: Breast reduction. In: Regnault P, Daniel K (eds), Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Principles and Techniques. Boston, Little Brown 1984, pp 499–538

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turner A, Dujon D: Predicting cup size after reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58(3):290–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalbhen C, McGill J, Fendley P, Corrigan K, Angelats J: Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(6):1643–1649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheffer D, Price T, Loughry C, Bolyard B, Morek W, Varga R: Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast. Ann Biomed Eng 1986;14(1):1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Loughry C W, Sheffer DB, Price TE Jr, Lackney MJ, Bartfai RG, Morek WM: Breast volume measurements of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80(4):553–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Loughry C W, Sheffer DB, Price TE, Einsporn RL, Bartfai RG, Morek WM, Meli NM: Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1989;22(5):380–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galdino G, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng J, Klatsky S, Manson P: Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(1):58–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nahabedian M, Galdino G: Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112(6):1582–1590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Losken A, Seify H, Denson D, Pardes AA Jr, Carlson G: Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(5):471–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nahabedian M: Discussion: validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(5):477–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos N, Biemer E: Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55(6):695–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E: New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57(6):602–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S: Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. The Breast 2001;10(2):117–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Endlich M, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E: Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. The Breast 2007;16(2):137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Caruso MK, Guillot T, Nguyen T, Greenway F: The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30(1):16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sommer NZ, Zook EG, Verhulst SJ: The prediction of breast reduction weight. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(2):506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sommer, N.Z., Zook, E.G. (2009). Prediction of Weight in Breast Reduction Surgery. In: Shiffman, M.A. (eds) Mastopexy and Breast Reduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89873-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89873-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89872-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89873-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics