Many studies showing the benefits of reduction mammaplasty have been reported; however, insurance companies have become more cost conscious and have made increasing efforts to deny this procedure. Spector and Karp [1] state that insurance companies often do not cover breast reductions that remove less than 1,000 g total (500 g of tissue from each side). However, their study shows that women who have less than 1,000 g of total weight removal, or even less than 750 g of totally removed, demonstrate “substantial relief of macromastia associated symptoms” and significant improvement in quality of life.
Seitchik and Schnur [2, 3] have recommended that the insurance companies base the minimum gram resection requirement on the patients weight and height rather than on an arbitrary number applied to all patients. Seitchik [2] found there was a correlation between body weight and a specimen weight of 0.68. He concluded that three levels of minimal volume resection should replace the one volume minimum. He proposed the weight resection correlations as follows: (1) Body weight less than 60 kg, 400 g resection. (2) Body weight 61–79 kg, 700 g resection. (3) Body weight >80 kg, 1,000 g resection. Schnur [3] gives percentiles of weight removal based on body surface area. The patient's body surface area, obtained by a graph of height and weight, determines the volume of breast tissue that must be removed to be above certain percentiles for all women having reductions. Below the fif h percentile is considered cosmetic, and above the 22nd percentile is considered medically necessary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Spector J, Karp N: Reduction mammaplasty: a significant improvement at any size. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(4):845–850
Seitchik MW: Reduction mammaplasty: criteria for insurance coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95(6):1029–1032
Schnur P, Schnur E, Petty PM, Hanson TJ, Weaver AL: Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(4):875–883
Becker H: Breast reduction insurance denials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(6):1687
Goldwyn RM: Breast reduction absurdum. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(1):246
Schultz R, Dolezal R, Nolan J: Further application of Archimedes' principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts. Ann Plast Surg 1986;16(2):98–101
Tezel E, Numanoglu A: Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105(3):1019–1023
Bouman F: Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1970;23(3):263–264
Wilkie T, Ship A: Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 1977;1:301–305
Tegtmeier R: A quick, accurate mammometer. Ann Plast Surg 1978;1(6):625–626
Palin WE Jr, Fraunhofer J, Smith DJ Jr: Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77(2):253–254
Grossman A, Roudner L: A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66(6):851–852
Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI: Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Human Biol 1979;6(4):363–367
Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G: Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30(2):129–132
Kanhai R, Hage J: Bra cup size depends on band size. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(1):300
Westreich M: Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(2):468–479
Sigurdson L, Kirkland S: Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(2):313–320
Regnault P, Daniel RK: Breast reduction. In: Regnault P, Daniel K (eds), Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Principles and Techniques. Boston, Little Brown 1984, pp 499–538
Turner A, Dujon D: Predicting cup size after reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58(3):290–298
Kalbhen C, McGill J, Fendley P, Corrigan K, Angelats J: Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(6):1643–1649
Sheffer D, Price T, Loughry C, Bolyard B, Morek W, Varga R: Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast. Ann Biomed Eng 1986;14(1):1–14
Loughry C W, Sheffer DB, Price TE Jr, Lackney MJ, Bartfai RG, Morek WM: Breast volume measurements of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80(4):553–558
Loughry C W, Sheffer DB, Price TE, Einsporn RL, Bartfai RG, Morek WM, Meli NM: Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1989;22(5):380–385
Galdino G, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng J, Klatsky S, Manson P: Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(1):58–70
Nahabedian M, Galdino G: Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112(6):1582–1590
Losken A, Seify H, Denson D, Pardes AA Jr, Carlson G: Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(5):471–476
Nahabedian M: Discussion: validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(5):477–476
Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos N, Biemer E: Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55(6):695–696
Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E: New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57(6):602–610
Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S: Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. The Breast 2001;10(2):117–123
Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Endlich M, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E: Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. The Breast 2007;16(2):137–145
Caruso MK, Guillot T, Nguyen T, Greenway F: The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30(1):16–20
Sommer NZ, Zook EG, Verhulst SJ: The prediction of breast reduction weight. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(2):506–511
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sommer, N.Z., Zook, E.G. (2009). Prediction of Weight in Breast Reduction Surgery. In: Shiffman, M.A. (eds) Mastopexy and Breast Reduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89873-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89873-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89872-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89873-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)