Fascial Suspension Mastopexy

  • Ram Silfen
  • Morris Ritz
  • Graeme Southwick

Breast projection, preservation of the natural submam-mary fold, and breast shape still represent a challenge in aesthetic breast surgery. Various techniques have been suggested in the literature to achieve a pleasant, youthful breast shape, which would oppose the gravitational forces that create the continuous ptotic effect. Among these, different suspension sutures and breast parenchy-mal flaps have been suggested [1–5].

Factors contributing to the gravitational effect of the breast were discussed vastly in literature. Whilst much attention was given in the past to the skin envelope as a major contributor for durable projection, recent attention was shifed towards the internal arrangement of the breast as playing major role in this task. Latest techniques described especially by South American authors [1, 6] burrow a lower pole breast parenchymal flap underneath a bipedicled pectoralis major muscle flap. Although a more durable projection of the breast is obtained, these techniques were not supported world wide, because breast cancer screening was made difficult and compartments have been violated.


Breast Cancer Screening Breast Reduction Breast Parenchyma Pectoralis Muscle Inframammary Fold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    GrafR, Biggs TM: In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(1):309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinderer UT: Circumareolar dermo-glandular plication: a new concept for correction of breast ptosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001;25(6):404–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caldeira AM, Lucas A: Pectoralis major muscle flap: a new support approach to mammaplasty, personal technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24(1):58–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lockwood T: Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(5):1411–1420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frey M: A new technique of reduction mammaplasty: dermis suspension and elimination of medial scars. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52(1):45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    GrafR, Reis de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG, Pace DT, Biggs T: Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy using the vertical scar and thoracic wall flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27(1):6–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwarzmann E: Avoidance of nipple necrosis by preservation of corium in one-stage plastic surgery of the breast. Rev Chir Struct 1937;7:206–209Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzales-Ulloa M: Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by means of exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 1960;25:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goulian D Jr: Dermal mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971;47(2):105–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. Regnault P: Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 1976;3(2):193–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lassus C: A technique for breast reduction. Int Surg 1970;53(1):69–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lejour M: Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94(1):100–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiss PR, Ship AG: Restoration of breast contour with autologous tissue after removal of implants. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34(3):236–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muti E: Personal approach to surgical correction of the extremely hypoplastic tuberous breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996;20(5):385–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flowers RS, Smith EM Jr: “Flip-flap” mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998;22(6):425–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall-Findlay EJ: A simplified vertical reduction mamma-plasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(3):748–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lewis GK: A method of mastopexy with fascia lata transplants. J Int Coll Surg 1956;26(3):346–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson GW: Central core reduction mammoplasties and Marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1981;5(1):77–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    PersoffMM: Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27(1):13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hammond DC: The SPAIR mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2002;29(3):411–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hall-Findlay EJ: Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 2002;29(3):379–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lejour M: Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(3):764–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hagerty RC: External mastopexy with imbrication following explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(3): 976–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fayman MS. Short scar mastopexy with flap transposition. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998;22(2):135–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goes JC: Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97(5):959–968PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram Silfen
  • Morris Ritz
    • 1
  • Graeme Southwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Melbourne Institute of Plastic SurgeryMalvernAustralia

Personalised recommendations