Advertisement

Abstract

Watching athletes allows coaches to provide both vital feedback on how well they are performing and on ways to improve their technique without causing or aggravating injuries. The thoroughness and accuracy of this traditional observation method are limited by human ability and availability. Supplementing coaches with sensor systems that generate accurate feedback on any technical aspect of the performance gives athletes a fall back if they do not have enough confidence in their coach’s assessment.

A system is presented to model the quality of arbitrary aspects of rowing technique found to be inconsistently well performed by a set of novice rowers when using an ergometer. Using only the motion of the handle, tracked using a high-fidelity motion capture system, a coach trains the system with their idea of the skill-level exhibited during each performance, by labeling example trajectories. Misclassification of unseen performances is encouragingly low, even for unknown performers.

Keywords

Novel Applications Sports coaching Quality Rowing Technique Body motion Intelligent Sensing Systems Spatiotemporal Pattern Recognition Shape Analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Ilg, W., Mezger, J., Giese, M.A.: Estimation of Skill Levels in Sports Based on Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Correspondences. In: Michaelis, B., Krell, G. (eds.) DAGM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2781, pp. 523–531. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy, Vignes, Yuh, Okamura: Automatic Motion Recognition and Skill Evaluation for Dynamic Tasks. In: EuroHaptics 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhong, Chang: Structure Analysis of Sports Video Using Domain Models. In: International Conference on Multimedia & Expo, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 920–923 (August 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leong, J.J.H., Nicolaou, M., Atallah, L., Mylonas, G.P., Darzi, A.W., Yang, G.-Z.: HMM Assessment of Quality of Movement Trajectory in Laparoscopic Surgery. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 752–759. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dosis, Aggarwal, Bello, Moorthy, Munz, Gillies, Darzi: Synchronized Video and Motion Analysis for the Assessment of Procedures in the Operating Theater. Arch. Surg. 140, 293–299 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon: Automated Video Assessment of Human Performance. In: Greer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of AI-ED 1995, pp. 541–546 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Australian Capital Territory Rowing Association, Rowing Technique for Coaches, http://www.rowingact.org.au/SDO/TECHNIQUE_1.html
  8. 8.
    Concept2, Rowing Technique, Faults and Corrections, http://www.concept2.co.uk/training/faults_corrections.php
  9. 9.
    Kaliouby, Robinson: Generalization of a vision-based computational model of mind-reading. In: First International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen, Solazzo, Hannaford, Sinanan: Objective Laparoscopic Skills Assessments of Surgical Residents Using Hidden Markov Models Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions. In: The Ninth Conference on Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    VICON, a motion capture system, http://www.vicon.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Fothergill
    • 1
  • Robert Harle
    • 1
  • Sean Holden
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeshireU.K.

Personalised recommendations