Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

  • 2184 Accesses

Scientists of the late 1920s, led by Bohr and Heisenberg, proposed a conception of nature radically different from that of their predecessors. The new conception, which grew out of efforts to comprehend the apparently irrational behavior of nature in the realm of quantum effects, was not simply a new catalog of the elementary spacetime realities and their modes of operation. It was essentially a rejection of the presumption that nature could be understood in terms of elementary spacetime realities. According to the new view, the complete description of nature at the atomic level was given by probability functions that referred not to underlying microscopic spacetime realities but rather to the macroscopic objects of sense experience. The theoretical structure did not extend down and anchor itself on fundamental microscopic spacetime realities. Instead it turned back and anchored itself in the concrete sense realities that form the basis of social life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. R. Popper and M. Bunge, in Quantum Theory and Reality, edited by M. Bunge (Springer, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. E. Ballentine, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bastin (editor), Quantum Theory and Beyond(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970); L. Rosenfeld, Suppl. Prog. Theoret. Phys.(extra number) 222 (1965); J. M. Jauch, E. P. Wigner, and M. M. Yanase, Nuovo Cimento 48B, 144 (1967); L. Rosenfeld, Nucl. Phys. A 108, 241 (1968); A. Loinger, Nucl. Phys. A 108, (1968); A. Fine, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2783 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Bohr, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934); Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge(Wiley, New York, 1958); Essays 1958/1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge(Wiley, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory(Dover, New York, 1930); in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, edited by W. Pauli (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955), p. 12; Physics and Philosophy(Harper and Row, New York, 1958); Daedalus 87, 95 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. F. von Weizsäcker, in Quantum Theory and Beyond, edited by E. Bastin (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Wigner, Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Ludwig, in Werner Heisenberg und der Physik unserer Zeit(FriedrichVieweg, Braunschweig, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Wigner, in The Scientist Speculates, edited by I. J. Good (Basic Books, New York, 1962), p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Everett III, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 463 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bryce DeWitt, Phys. Today 23, 30 (Sept. 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Rosenfeld, Nucl. Phys. A 108, 241 (1968).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964) and Varenna Lectures, Preprint TH.l220-CERN, Aug. 1970. See also ref. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. James, The Meaning of Truth (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1970). This reference to James does not mean that the ideas reviewed in this section are exactly those of James or wholly those of James. Countless philosophers have said similar things.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ref. 17, p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ref. 17, p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Einstein, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. A. Schilpp (Tudor, New York, 1951), p. 675.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935); and in ref. 20, p. 201.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Einstein, in ref. 20, p. 665.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For an interesting and very readable account of the four principal conceptual structures that have been advanced as the basis of overall world views see S. C. Pepper, World Hypothesis (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stapp, H.P. (2009). The Copenhagen Interpretation. In: Stapp, H.P. (eds) Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89654-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics