Advertisement

Sparse Representation for Ear Biometrics

  • Imran Naseem
  • Roberto Togneri
  • Mohammed Bennamoun
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5359)

Abstract

In this paper we address for the first time, the problem of user identification using ear biometrics in the context of sparse representation. During the training session the compressed ear images are transformed to vectors to develop a dictionary matrix A [1]. The downsampled probe vector y is used to develop a linear, underdetermined system of equation y = Ax, x being unknown. The ill-posed system is regularized by utilizing the sparse nature of x and the inverse problem is solved through the l 1-norm minimization. Ideally the nonzero entries in the recovered vector x correspond to the class of the probe y. The developed system does not assume any preprocessing or normalization of the ear region. We did extensive experiments on the UND [2,3] and the FEUD [4] databases with session variability and incorporating different head rotations and lighting conditions. The proposed system is found to be robust under varying light and head rotations yielding a high recognition rate of the order of 98%. Moreover, in context of sparse representation a tuning parameter of the system is identified and is designated as an Operating Point (OP). The significance of the OP is highlighted by mathematical arguments and experimental verifications.

Keywords

Operating Point Smart Card Sparse Representation Nonzero Entry Head Rotation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wright, J., Yang, A., Ganesh, A., Sastri, S.S., Ma, Y.: Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. PAMI (2008) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flynn, P.J., Bowyer, K.W., Phillips, P.J.: Assessment of time dependency in face recognition: An initial study. Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 44–51 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, K., Bowyer, K.W., Sarkar, S., Victor, B.: Comparison and combinations of ear and faces images in appearance-based biometrics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligences 25(9), 1160–1165 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, L., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Jia, Y.: Ear recognition based on statistical shape model. In: International Conference on Innovative Computing Information and Control (ICICIC 2006) (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins, L.: Earmarked(biometrics). IEE Review 51(11), 38–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iannarelli, A.: Ear identification. Paramount Publishing Company, Freemont (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hurley, D.J., Arbab-Zavar, B., Nixon, M.S.:The ear as a biometric. In: Handbook of Biometrics (2007) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno, B., Sanchez, A.: On the use of outer ear images for personal identification in security applications. In: Proc. IEEE 33rd Annual Intl. Conf. on Security Technology, pp. 469–476 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iwano, K., Hirose, T., Kamibayashi, E., Furui, S.: Audio-visual person authentication using speech and ear images. In: Proc. of Workshop on Multimodal User Authentication, pp. 85–90 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arbab-Zavar, B., Nixon, M.S., Hurley, D.J.: On model-based analysis of ear biomtrics. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (September 2007) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baraniuk, R.: Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 24 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donoho, D.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Candès, E., Romberg, J., Tao, T.: Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(2), 489–509 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baraniuk, R., Davenport, M., DeVore, R., Wakin, M.B.: The johnson-lindenstrauss lemma meets compressed sensing (2006), dsp.rice.edu/cs/jlcs-v03.pdf
  15. 15.
    Donoho, D.: For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l 1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math. 59(6), 797–829 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Candès, E., Romberg, J., Tao, T.: Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math. 59(8), 1207–1223 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Candès, E., Tao, T.: Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies? IEEE Tran. Infm. Theory 52(12), 5406–5425 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Naseem
    • 1
  • Roberto Togneri
    • 1
  • Mohammed Bennamoun
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations