Advertisement

Using Multiple Masks to Improve End-to-End Face Recognition Performance

  • Christopher A. Neylan
  • Andrea Salgian
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5359)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a method to improve performance in end to end face recognition systems. Our system uses a combination of masks that extract different regions of the face, and performs recognition separately on each region. Individual mask results are then combined through weighted sums and Borda voting. We test the method in conjunction with the fisherfaces (LDA) algorithm, and we analyze performance in an end-to-end system where face recognition is preceded by face and then eye detection using the Viola Jones algorithm. We find that our method improves recognition results by almost 10% on both manual and automatically detected face and eye locations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Viola, P., Jones, M.: Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Kauai, HI (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belhumeur, P., Hespanha, J., Kriegman, D.: Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19, 711–720 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lienhart, R., Maydt, J.: An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 900–903 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradski, G., Kaehler, A., Pisarevsky, V.: Learning-based computer vision with intel’s open source computer vision library. Intel Technology Journal 09 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Open source computer vision library, http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/opencv/
  6. 6.
    Santana, M.C., Navarro, J.L., Suarez, O.D., Martel, A.F.: Multiple face detection at different resolutions for perceptual user interfaces. In: 2nd Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Estoril, Portugal (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 71–86 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martinez, A.: Recognizing imprecisely localized, partially occluded and expression variant faces from a single sample per class. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 748–763 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russel, N.: Complexity of control of borda count elections. Master’s thesis, RIT (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Fox, N.A., O’Mullane, B.A., Reilly, R.B.: The realistic multi-modal valid database and visual speaker identification comparison experiments. In: 5th International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA 2005), New York (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher A. Neylan
    • 1
  • Andrea Salgian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe College of New JerseyEwingUSA

Personalised recommendations