Looking at the Interactive Narrative Experience through the Eyes of the Participants

  • David Milam
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
  • Ron Wakkary
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5334)

Abstract

The topic of interactive narrative has been under research for many years. While there has been much research exploring the development of new algorithms that enable and enhance interactive narratives, there has been little research focusing on the question of how players understand and internalize their interactive narrative experiences. This paper addresses this problem through conducting a phenomenological study on participants playing Façade; we specifically chose a phenomenological methodology due to its emphasis on the participants’ lived experience from the participants’ viewpoint. We chose Façade, because it is the only accessible example of an experience that revolves around social relationships, conflict, and drama as its core mechanics. In this paper, we discuss sixteen themes that resulted from the analysis of the data gathered through the study. In addition, we reflect on these themes discussing their relationship to participants’ backgrounds, and project implications on the design of future interactive narratives.

Keywords

Design Interactive Narrative Storytelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Loyall, B.A.: Believable Agents: Building Interactive Personalities. Computer Science Department, PhD. dissertation, p. 222. Carnagie Mellon University, Pittsburg (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weyhrauch, P.: Guiding Interactive Drama. In: School of Computer Science, PhD. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Szilas, N.: Stepping into the Interactive Drama. In: Göbel, S., Spierling, U., Hoffmann, A., Iurgel, I., Schneider, O., Dechau, J., Feix, A. (eds.) TIDSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3105, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seif El-Nasr, M.: Interaction, Narrative, and Drama Creating an Adaptive Interactive Narrative using Performance Arts Theories (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magerko, B.: Story representation and interactive drama. In: 1st Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, Marina del Rey, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bates, J., Loyall, B., Reilly, S.: An Architecture for Action, Emotion, and Social Behavior. Computer Science, 14 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Façade: An Experiment in Building a Fully-Realized Interactive Drama. In: Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moustakas, C.: Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colaizzi, P.F.: Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. Oxford University Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Husserl: Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1931)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reilly, S.: Believable Social and Emotional Agents. Computer Science, PhD. dissertation, Carnagie Mellon University, Pittsburg (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mateas, M., Stearn, A.: Procedural Authorship: A Case-Study Of the Interactive Drama Façade. In: Digital Arts and Culture (DAC), Copenhagen (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szilas, N.: The Future of Interactive Drama. In: 2005 Australasian conference on interactive entertainment (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seif El-Nasr, M.: An Interactive Narrative Architecture based on Filmmaking Theory (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thue, D., Bulitko, V., Spetch, M., Wasylishen, E.: Learning Player Preferences to Inform Delayed Authoring. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, Arlington, VA (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aylett, R., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., Vala, M.: FearNot! - An Experiment in Emergent Narrative. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3661, pp. 305–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pizzi, D., Cavazza, M.: Affective Storytelling based on Characters’ Feelings, University of Teesside (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mallon, B., Webb, B.: Stand up and take your place: identifying narrative elements in narrative adventure and role-play games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 3, 6 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehta, M., Dow, S., Mateas, M., MacIntyre, B.: Evaluating a Conversation-centered Interactive Drama. In: Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dow, S.M., Lausier, A., MacIntyre, B., Mateas, M.: Initial Lessons from ARFaçade, An Interactive Augmented Reality Drama. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE 2006), Los Angeles (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stern, M.M.A.: Architecture, Authorial Idioms and Early Observations of the Interactive Drama Façade (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA (1985)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seif El-Nasr, M., Al-Saati, M., Niedenthal, S., Milam, D.: Assassin’s Creed: A Multicultural Read. In: 2nd Annual Canadian Game Studies Association Conference, Vancouver, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pennington, D.: Social Cognition (Routledge Modular Psychology). Routledge, London (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Milam
    • 1
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
    • 1
  • Ron Wakkary
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Ineractive Arts and TechnologySimon Fraser UniversitySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations