Mechanical Integration of Plant Cells

  • Anna Kasprowicz
  • Daniel Kierzkowski
  • Michalina Maruniewicz
  • Marta Derba-Maceluch
  • Ewelina Rodakowska
  • Paweł Zawadzki
  • Agnieszka Szuba
  • Przemysław Wojtaszek
Part of the Signaling and Communication in Plants book series (SIGCOMM)


In order to function in changing environmental conditions, all living organisms need to be equipped with two sets of seemingly contradictory mechanisms; these enable them to (1) integrate themselves in separation from the environment, and (2) sense and communicate with their immediate surrounding. During the course of evolution, several factors—both physical and chemical—have emerged as organismal integrators. Among these, gravity provides a major directional stimulus, while chemical compounds are usually used as internal integratory molecules (Bhalerao and Bennett 2003).

Although the same cellular toolkit of their common ancestor gave rise to present-day eukaryotes through evolution, it should be remembered that plant and animal lineages diverged about 1 billion years before they became multicellular organisms. As a consequence, plants and animals differ in their lifestyles, responses to stimuli, and adaptations to the environment. This distinction results from the adoption of two different strategies of coping with the regulation of intracellular water content, and is reflected in the properties and behavior of "naked" animal cells vs. “walled” plant cells (Peters et al. 2000). Thus, while animals are able to move away when conditions are unfavorable, plants—since they are sessile organisms—must react and/or adapt to changes. As a result, much greater plasticity of plants and their cells is observed (Valladares et al. 2000).

All organisms have the ability to sense and respond to a variety of physical stimuli, such as radiation, temperature, and gravity (Volkmann and Baluška 2006). Although physical forces act in the same manner on different organisms, the effects of their actions depend on the organism's habitat. For example, the effect of gravitational force on an organism depends greatly on whether it lives in water or on land. On the other hand, the forces exerted on terrestrial plants by the movement of air are much lower than those exerted on aquatic ones by the movement of water (Niklas et el. 2000). Thus, although the overall construction of any particular plant or plant cell is generally similar to that of any other, the details of the biochemical and mechanical designs can vary considerably, as these are also shaped by the changing conditions in the cell's or organism's immediate surroundings.


Pollen Tube Mechanical Stimulus Cellulose Microfibril Gravitropic Response Tensegral Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Antosiewicz D, Polisensky D, Braam J (1995) Cellular localization of the Ca2+ binding CH3 protein of Arabidopsis. Plant J 8:623–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antosiewicz D, Purugganan M, Polisensky D, Braam J (1997) Cellular localization of Arabidopsis xyloglucan endotransglycosylase-related proteins during development and after wind stimulation. Plant Physiol 115:1319–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aon MA, Cortassa S, Gomez Casati DF, Iglesias AA (2000) Effects of stress on cellular infrastructure and metabolic organization in plant cells. Int Rev Cytol 194:239–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnaout MA, Goodman SL, Xiong J-P (2007) Structure and mechanics of integrin-based cell adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19:495–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assoian RK, Klein EA (2008) Growth control by intracellular tension and extracellular stiffness. Trands Cell Biol 18:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baluška F, Hasenstein KH (1997) Root cytoskeleton: its role in perception of and response to gravity. Planta 203:S69– S78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baluška F, Hlavačka A (2005) Plant formins come of age: something special about cross-walls. New Phytol 168:499–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baluška F, Salaj J, Mathur J, Braun M, Jasper F, Šamaj J, Chua N-H, Barlow PW, Volkmann D (2000) Root hair formation: F-actin-dependent tip growth is initiated by local assembly of profilin-supported F-actin meshworks accumulated within expansin-enriched bulges. Dev Biol 227:618–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baluška F, Jasik J, Edelmann HG, Salajova T, Volkmann D (2001) Latrunculin B-induced plant dwarfism: plant cell elongation is F-actin-dependent. Dev Biol 231:113–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baluška F, Šamaj J, Wojtaszek P, Volkmann D, Menzel D (2003) Cytoskeleton–plasma membrane–cell wall continuum in plants. Emerging links revisited. Plant Physiol 133:482–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barlow P (1995) Gravity perception in plants—a multiplicity of systems derived by evolution. Plant Cell Environ 18:951–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barthou H, Petitprez M, Brière C, Souvré A, Alibert G (1998) RGD-mediated membrane-matrix adhesion triggers agarose-induced embryoid formation in sunflower protoplasts. Protoplasma 206:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benjamins R, Ampudia C, Hooykaas P, Offringa R (2003) PINOID-mediated signaling involves calcium-binding proteins. Plant Physiol 132:1623–1630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berger F, Taylor A, Brownlee C (1994) Cell fate determination by the cell wall in early Fucus development. Science 263:1421–1423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhalerao RP, Bennett MJ (2003) The case for morphogens in plants. Nat Cell Biol 5:939–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blancaflor EB (2002) The cytoskeleton and gravitropism in higher plants. J Plant Growth Regul 21:120–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blancaflor EB, Masson PH (2003) Plant gravitropism. Unraveling the up and downs of a complex process. Plant Physiol 133:1677–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blancaflor EB, Fasano JM, Gilroy S (1998) Mapping the functional roles of cap cells in the response of Arabidopsis primary roots to gravity. Plant Physiol 116:213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blatt MR (2000) Cellular signaling and volume control in stomatal movements in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16:221–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boudsocq M, Laurière C (2005) Osmotic signalling in plants. Multiple pathways mediated by emerging kinase families. Plant Physiol 138:1185–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Braam J (1992) Regulated expression of the calmodulin-related TCH genes in cultured Arabidopsis cells: Induction by calcium and heat shock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:3213–3216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Braam J (2005)In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 165:373–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braam J , Davis R(1990)Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis. Cell 60:357–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Braam J, Sistrunk M, Polisensky D, Xu W, Purugganan M, Antosiewicz D, Campbell P, Johnson K (1997) Plant responses to environmental stress: regulation and functions of the Arabidopsis TCH genes. Planta 203:S35–S41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Braun M (2002) Gravity perception requires statoliths settles on specific plasma membrane areas in characean rhisoids and protonemata. Protoplasma 219:150–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Braun M, Buchen B, Sievers A (2002) Actomyosin-mediated statolith positioning in gravisensing plant cells studied in microgravity. J Plant Growth Regul 21:137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Canut H, Carrasco A, Galaud JP, Cassan C, Bouyssou H, Vita N, Ferrara P, Pont-Lezica R (1998) High affinity RGD-binding sites at the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana links the cell wall. Plant J 16:63–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Caspar T, Pickard BG (1989) Gravitropism in starchless mutant of Arabidopsis—implication for the starch-statolith theory of gravity sensing. Planta 177:185–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chuong SDX, Franceschi VR, Edwards GE (2006) The cytoskeleton maintains organelle partitioning required for single-cell C 4 photosynthesis in Chenopodiaceae species. Plant Cell 18:2207–2223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chytilova E, Macas J, Śliwinska E, Rafelski SM, Lambert GM, Galbraith DW (2000) Nuclear dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Cell 11:2733–2741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cleary AL (2001) Plasma membrane-cell wall connections: roles in mitosis and cytokinesis revealed by plasmolysis of Tradescantia virginiana leaf epidermal cells. Protoplasma 215:21–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coba de la Peña T, Cárcamo CB, Almonacid L, Zaballos A, Lucas MM, Balomenos D, Pueyo JJ (2008) A salt stress-responsive cytokinin receptor homologue isolated from Medicago sativa nodules. Planta 227:769–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Comstock JP (2002) Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. J Exp Bot 53:195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Decreux A, Messiaen J (2005) Wall-associated kinase WAK1 interacts with cell wall pectins in a calcium-induced conformation. Plant Cell Physiol 46 :268–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Deeks MJ, Hussey PJ, Davies B (2002) Formins: intermediates in signal-transduction cascades that affect cytoskeletal reorganization. Trends Plant Sci 7:492–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Driss-Ecole D, Lefranc A, Perbal G (2003) A polarized cell: root statocyte. Physiol Plant 118:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dutta R, Robinson KR (2004) Identification and characterization of stretch-activated ion channels in pollen protoplasts. Plant Physiol 135:1398–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Emons AMC, Mulder BM (2000) How the deposition of cellulose microfibrils builds cell wall architecture. Trends Plant Sci 5:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Esmon C, Pedmale U, Liscum E (2005) Plant tropisms: providing the power of movement to a sessile organism. Int J Dev Biol 49:665–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fasano JM, Swanson SJ, Blancaflor EB, Dowd PE, Kao TH, Gilroy S (2001) Changes in root cap pH are required for gravity response of the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 13:907–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Fasano JM, Massa GD, Gilroy S (2002) Ionic signaling in plant responses to gravity and touch. J Plant Growth Regul 21:71–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fisher DD, Cyr RJ (1998) Extending the microtubule/microfibril paradigm. Cellulose synthesis is required for normal cortical microtubule alignment in elongating cells. Plant Physiol 116:1043–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Forgacs G (1995) On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: an approach based on percolation. J Cell Sci 108:2131–2143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Friml J, Wiśniewska J, Benkova G, Mendgen K, Palme K (2002) Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature 415:806–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fukaki H, Wysocka-Diller J, Kato T, Fujisawa H, Benfey PN, Tasaka M (1998) Genetic evidence that the endodermis is essential for shoot gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 14:425–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gens JS, Fujiki M, Pickard BG (2000) Arabinogalactan protein and wall-associated kinase in a plasmalemmal reticulum with specialized vertices. Protoplasma 212:115–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gouget A, Senchou V, Govers F, Sanson A, Barre A, Rouge P, Pont-Lezica R, Canut H (2006) Lectin receptor kinases participate in protein–protein interactions to mediate plasma membrane–cell wall adhesions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 140:81–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Green PB (1999) Expression of pattern in plants: combining molecular and calculus-based biophysical paradigms. Am J Bot 86:1059–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grefen C, Harter K (2004) Plant two-component systems: principles, functions, complexity and cross talk. Planta 219:733–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gus-Mayer S, Naton B, Hahlbrock K, Schmelzer E (1998) Local mechanical stimulation induces components of the pathogen defense response in parsley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8398–8403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hardham AR, Takemoto D, White RG (2008) Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack. BMC Plant Biol 8:63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harold FM (1995) From morphogenes to morphogenesis. Microbiology 141:2765–2778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Haswell ES, Meyerowitz E (2006) MscS-like proteins control plastid size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 16:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Haswell ES, Peyronnet R, Barbier-Brygoo H, Meyerowitz E, Frachisse J-M (2008) Two MscS homologs provide mechanosensitive channel activities in the Arabidopsis root. Curr Biol 18:730–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hayashi T, Takagi S (2003) Ca2+-dependent cessation of cytoplasmic streaming induced by hypertonic treatment in Vallisneria mesophyll cells: possible role of cell wall–plasma membrane adhesion. Plant Cell Physiol 44:1027–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hayashi T, Harada A, Sakai T, Takagi S (2006) Ca2+ transient induced by extracellular changes in osmotic pressure in Arabidopsis leaves: differential involvement of cell wall–plasma membrane adhesion. Plant Cell Environ 29:661–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. He YC, He YQ, Qu LH, Sun MX, Yang HY (2007) Tobacco zygotic embryogenesis in vitro: the original cell wall of the zygote is essential for maintenance of cell polarity, the apical–basal axis and typical suspensor formation. Plant J 49:515–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Heinlein M, Epel BL (2004) Macromolecular transport and signaling through plasmodesmata. Int Rev Cytol 235:93–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hernández LF, Green PB (1993) Transductions for the expression of structural pattern: analysis in sunflower. Plant Cell 5:1725–1738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Himmelspach R, Wymer CL, Lloyd CW, Nick P (1999) Gravity-induced reorientation of cortical microtubules observed in vivo. Plant J 18:449–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:300–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Homann U, Meckel1 T, Hewing J, Hütt M-T, Hurst AC (2007) Distinct fluorescent pattern of KAT1::GFP in the plasma membrane of Vicia faba guard cells. Eur J Cell Biol 86:489–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hoson T, Saito Y, Soga K, Wakabayashi K (2005) Signal perception, transduction, and response in gravity resistance. Another graviresponse in plants. Adv Space Res 36:1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hou G, Kramer VL, Wang YS, Chen R, Perbal G, Gilroy S Blancaflor EB (2004) The promotion of gravitropism in Arabidopsis roots upon disruption is coupled with the extended alkalization of the columella cytoplasm and a persistent lateral auxin gradient. Plant J 39:113–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hussey P, Allwood E, Smertenko A (2002) Actin-binding proteins in the Arabidopsis genome database: properties of functionally distinct plant actin-depolymerizing factors/cofilins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:791–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ingber DE (2003a) Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116:1157–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ingber DE (2003b) Tensegrity II. How structural network influence cellular information processing network. J Cell Sci 116:1397–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kaplan DR, Cooke TJ (1997) Fundamental concepts in the embryogenesis of dicotyledons: a morphological interpretation of embryo mutants. Plant Cell 9:1903 –1919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kern VD, Schwuchow JM, Reed DW, Nadeau JA, Lucas J, Skripnikov A, Sack FD (2005) Gravitropic moss cells default to spiral growth on the clinostat and in microgravity during spaceflight. Planta 221:149– 157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kiss JZ, Guisinger M, Miller A, Stackhouse K (1997) Reduced gravitropism in hypocotyls of starch-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 38:518–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Knight M, Campbell A, Smith S, Trewavas A (1991) Transgenic plant aequorin reports the effects of touch and cold-shock and elicitors on cytoplasmic calcium. Nature 352:524–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ko JH, Han KH, Park S, Yang J (2004) Plant body weight-induced secondary growth in Arabidopsis and its transcription phenotype revealed by whole-transcriptome profiling. Plant Physiol 135:1069–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kohorn BD (2000) Plasma membrane–cell wall contacts. Plant Physiol 124:31–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kohorn BD (2001) WAKs: cell wall associated kinases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:529–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Koizumi T, Sakaki T, Usui S, Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Hoson T (2007) Changes in a membrane lipid composition in adzuki bean epicotyls under hypergravity conditions: possible role of membrane sterols in gravity resistance. Adv Space Res 39:1198–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Komis G, Apostolakos P, Galatis B (2003) Actomyosin is involved in the plasmolytic cycle: gliding movement of the deplasmolyzing protoplast. Protoplasma 221:245–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kung C (2005) A possible unifying principle of mechanosensation. Nature 436:647–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kutschera U (2008) The growing outer epidermal wall: design and physiological role of a composite structure. Ann Bot 101:615–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kuznetsov OA, Hasenstein KH (1997) Magnetophoretic induction of curvature in coleoptiles and hypocotyls. J Exp Bot 48:1951–1957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. LaMotte CE, Pickard BG (2004) Control of gravitropic orientation. II. Dual receptor model for gravitropism. Funct Plant Biol 31:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lang I, Barton DA, Overall RL (2004) Membrane-wall attachments in plasmolysed plant cells. Protoplasma 224:231–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lang-Pauluzzi I, Gunning BES (2000) A plasmolytic cycle: the fate of cytoskeletal elements. Protoplasma 212:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lee D, Polisensky D, Braam J (2005) Genome-wide identification of touch- and darkness- regulated Arabidopsis gene: a focus on calmodulin-like and XTH genes. New Phytol 165:429–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Legué V, Blancaflor E, Wymer C, Perbal G, Fantin D, Gilroy S (1997) Cytoplasmic free Ca2+ in Arabidopsis roots changes in response to touch but not gravity. Plant Physiol 114:789–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Limbach C, Hauslage J, Schöfer C, Braun M (2005) How to activate a plant gravireceptor. Early mechanisms of gravity sensing studied in Characean rhizoids during parabolic flights. Plant Physiol 139:1030–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lintilhac PM, Vesecky TB (1984). Stress-induced alignment of division plane in plant tissues grown in vitro. Nature 307:363–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lucas WJ, Ding B, van der Schoot C (1993) Plasmodesmata and the supracellular nature of plants. New Phytol 125:435–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lynch TM, Lintilhac PM (1997) Mechanical signals in plant development: a new method for single cell studies. Dev Biol 181:246–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE (1997) Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:849–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Maniotis AJ, Valyi-Nagy K, Karavitis J, Moses J, Boddipali V, Wang Y, Nuñez R, Setty S, Arbieva Z, Bissell MJ, Folberg R (2005) Chromatin organization measured by AluI restriction enzyme changes with malignancy and is regulated by the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Am J Pathol 166:1187–1203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Marshall JG, Dumbroff EB (1999) Turgor regulation via cell wall adjustment in white spruce. Plant Physiol 119:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Martinac B (2004) Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci 117:2449–2460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Massa GD, Gilroy S (2003) Touch modulates gravity sensing to regulate the growth of primary roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 33:435–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mathur J (2006) Local interactions shape plant cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:40–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Matsumoto S, Saito Y, Kamasaki S, Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Hoson T (2007) Up-regulation of expression of tubulin genes and roles of microtubules in hypergravity-induced growth modification in Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Adv Space Res 39:1179–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. McCormack E, Braam J (2003) Calmodulins and related potential calcium sensors of Arabidopsis. New Phytol 159:585–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Meckel T, Hurst AC, Thiel G, Homann U (2005) Guard cells undergo constitutive and pressure driven membrane turnover. Protoplasma 226:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mellersh DG, Heath MC (2001) Plasma membrane–cell wall adhesion is required for expression of plant defense responses during fungal penetration. Plant Cell 13:413–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Meyer Y, Abel WO (1975) Importance of the wall for cell division and in the activity of the cytoplasm in cultured tobacco protoplasts. Planta 123:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Morris CE, Homann U (2001) Cell surface area regulation and membrane tension. J Membrane Biol 179:79–102Google Scholar
  102. Na S, Collin O, Chowdhury F, Tay B, Ouyang M, Wang Y, Wang N (2008) Rapid signal transduction in living cells is a unique feature of mechanotransduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6626–6631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nakagawa N, Sakurai N (2001) Cell wall integrity controls expression of endoxyloglucan transferase in tobacco BY2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol 42:240–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Nakagawa Y, Katagiri T, Shinozaki K, Qi Z, Tatsumi H, Furuichi T, Kishigami A, Sokabe M, Kojima I, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Lida K, Terashima A, Nakano M, Ikeda M, Yamanaka T, Lida H (2007) Arabidopsis plasma membrane protein crucial for Ca2+ influx and touch sensing in roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3639–3644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, Spector AA, Chen CS (2005) Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11594–11599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  107. Okada K, Shimura Y (1990) Reversible root-tip rotation in Arabidopsis seedlings induced by obstacle-touching stimulus. Science 250:274–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Orr AW, Helmke BP, Blackman BR, Schwartz MA (2006) Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev Cell 10:11–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Palmieri M, Kiss JZ (2005) Disruption of F-actin cytoskeleton limits statolith movement in Arabidopsis hypocotyls. J Exp Bot 56:2539–2550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Panteris E, Galatis B (2005) The morphogenesis of lobed plant cells in the mesophyll and epidermis: organization and distinct roles of cortical microtubules and actin filaments. New Phytol 167:721–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Paredez AR, Somerville CR, Ehrhardt DW (2006) Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules. Science 312:1491–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Paredez AR, Persson S, Ehrhardt DW, Somerville CR (2008) Genetic evidence that cellulose synthase activity influences microtubule cortical array organization. Plant Physiol 147(4):1723–1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pelling AE, Sehati S, Gralla EB, Valentine JS, Gimzewski JK (2004) Local nanomechanical motion of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 305:1147–1150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Perbal G, Driss-Ecole D (2003) Mechanotransduction in gravisensing cells. Trends Plant Sci 8:498–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Perrin R, Young L, Murthy N, Harrison B, Wang Y, Will A, Masson PH (2005) Gravity signal transduction in primary roots. Ann Bot 96:737–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Peters WS, Hagemann W , Tomos DA (2000) What makes plants different? Principles of extracellular matrix function in "soft" plant tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol A 125:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Pickard BG (2007) Delivering force and amplifying signals in plant mechanosensing. In: Mechanosensitive ion channels, Part A. Elsevier, New York, pp 361–392Google Scholar
  118. Plieth ,CTrewavasAJ (2002) Reorientation of seedlings in the Earth's gravitational field induces cytosolic calcium transiently. Plant Physiol 129:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Proseus TE, Boyer JS (2006a) Identifying cytoplasmic input to the cell wall of growing Chara corallina. J Exp Bot 57:3231–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Proseus TE, Boyer JS (2006b) Periplasm turgor pressure controls wall deposition and assembly in growing Chara corallina cells. Ann Bot 98:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Proseus TE, Zhu GL, Boyer JS (2000) Turgor, temperature and the growth of plant cells: using Chara corallina as a model system. J Exp Bot 51:1481–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Qu L-H, Sun M-X (2007) The plant cell nucleus is constantly alert and highly sensitive to repetitive local mechanical stimulation. Plant Cell Rep 26:1187–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Reiser V, Raitt DC, Saito H (2003) Yeast osmosensor Sln1 and plant cytokinin receptor Cre1 respond to changes in turgor pressure. J Cell Biol 161:1035–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Roberts SK (2006) Plasma membrane anion channels in higher plants and their putative functions in roots. New Phytol 169:647–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sack FD (1997) Plastids and gravity sensing. Planta 203:S63–S68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sato Y, Kadota A, Wada M (2003) Chloroplast movement: dissection of events downstream of photo- and mechano-perception. J Plant Res 116:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Schindler M, Meiners S, Cheresh DA(1989)RGD-dependent linkage between plant cell wall and plasma membrane: Consequences for growth. J Cell Biol 108:1955–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmidt SM, Panstruga R (2007) Cytoskeleton functions in plant-microbe interactions. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 71:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB (2001) Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10763–10768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Shope JC, DeWald DB, Mott KA (2003) Changes in surface area of intact guard cells are correlated with membrane internalization. Plant Physiol 133:1314–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Hoson T (2002) Perception of gravity stimuli by mechanosensitive ion channels in plant seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 43:182Google Scholar
  132. Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Hoson T (2005a) Mechanoreceptors rather than sedimentable amyloplasts perceive the gravity signal in hypergravity-induced inhibition of root growth in adzuki bean. Funct Plant Biol 32:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Hoson T (2005b) Hypergravity inhibits elongation growth of adzuki bean epicotyls independently of the direction of stimuli. Adv Space Res 36:1269–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Hoson T (2006) Hypergravity induces reorientation of cortical microtubules and modifies growth anisotropy in adzuki bean epicotyls. Planta 224:1485–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Staves MP (1997) Cytoplasmic streaming and gravity sensing in Chara internodal cells. Planta 203(Suppl 1):S79–S84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Staves MP, Wayne R, Leopold AC (1992) Hydrostatic pressure mimics gravitational pressure in characean cells. Protoplasma 168:141–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Staves MP, Wayne R, Leopold AC (1997) Cytochalasin D does not inhibit gravitropism in roots. Am J Bot 84:1530–1535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Tamura T, Hara K, Yamaguchi Y, Koizumi N, Sano H (2003) Osmotic stress tolerance of transgenic tobacco expressing a gene encoding a membrane-located receptor-like protein from tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 131:454–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tasaka M, Kato T, Fukaki H (2001) Genetic regulation of gravitropism in higher plants. Int Rev Cytol 206:135–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Telewski F (2006) A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. Am J Bot 93:1466–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Urao T, Yakubov B, Satoh R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M, Hirayama T, Shinozaki K (1999) A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell 11:1743–1754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 176:749–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Valle F, Sandal M, Samorì B (2007) The interplay between chemistry and mechanics in the transduction of a mechanical signal into a biochemical function. Physics Life Rev 4:157–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. van den Berg C, Willemsen V, Hage W, Weisbeek P, Scheres B (1995) Cell fate in the Arabidopsis root meristem determined by directional signalling. Nature 378:62–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. van den Berg C, Willemsen V, Hendriks G, Weisbeek P, Scheres B (1997) Short-range control of cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Nature 390:287–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. van der Honing HS, Emons AMC, Ketelaar T (2007) Actin based processes that could determine the cytoplasmic architecture of plant cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773:604–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Vitha S, Yang M, Sack FD, Kiss JZ (2007) Gravitropism in the starch excess mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Am J Bot 94:590–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Vogel V, Sheetz M (2006) Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:265–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Volkmann D, Baluška F (2006) Gravity: one of the driving forces in evolution. Protoplasma 229:143–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wayne R, Staves MP, Leopold AC (1992) The contribution of the extracellular matrix to gravisensing in characean cells. J Cell Sci 101:611–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Wendt M, Kuo-Huang L, Sievers A (1987) Gravitropic bending of cress roots without contact between amyloplasts and complexes of endoplasmic reticulum. Planta 172:321–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wightman R , Turner SR (2008) The roles of the cytoskeleton during cellulose deposition at the secondary cell wall. Plant J 54:794–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wohlbach DJ, Quirino BF, Sussman MR (2008) Analysis of the Arabidopsis histidine kinase ATHK1 reveals a connection between vegetative osmotic stress sensing and seed maturation. Plant Cell 20:1101–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wojtaszek P (2000) Genes and plant cell walls: a difficult relationship. Biol Rev 75:437–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wojtaszek P (2001) Organismal view of a plant and a plant cell. Acta Biochim Polon 48:443–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Wojtaszek P, Anielska-Mazur A, Gabryś H, Baluška F, Volkmann D (2005) Rapid relocation of myosin VIII between cell periphery and plastid surfaces are root-specific and provide the evidence for actomyosin involvement in osmosensing. Funct Plant Biol 32:721–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Wojtaszek P, Baluška F, Kasprowicz A, Łuczak M, Volkmann D (2007) Domain-specific mechanosensory transmission of osmotic and enzymatic cell wall disturbances to the actin cytoskeleton. Protoplasma 230:217–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wolverton C, Mullen JL, Ishikawa H, Evens ML (2002) Root gravitropism in response to a signal originating outside of the cap. Planta 215:153–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Wyatt SE, Carpita NC (1993) The plant cytoskeleton–cell wall continuum. Trends Cell Biol 3:413–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wymer C, Lloyd C (1996) Dynamic microtubules: implications for cell wall patterns. Trends Plant Sci 1:222–228Google Scholar
  161. Wymer CL, Wymer SA, Cosgrove DJ, Cyr RJ (1996) Plant cell growth responds to external forces and the response requires intact microtubules. Plant Physiol 110:425–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Xiong TC, Jauneau A, Ranjeva R, Mazars C (2004) Isolated plant nuclei as mechanical and thermal sensors involved in calcium signalling. Plant J 40:12–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Xu W, Purugganan M, Polisensky D, Antosiewicz D, Fry S, Braam J (1995) Arabidopsis TCH4, regulated by hormones and the environment, encodes a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. Plant Cell 7:1555–1567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Yahraus T, Chandra S, Legendre L, Low PS (1995) Evidence for a mechanically induced oxidative burst. Plant Physiol 109:1259–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Yamamoto K, Kiss JZ (2002) Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton results in the promotion of gravitropism in inflorescence stems and hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 128:669–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Yang L, Reece JM, Cho J, Bortner CD, Shears SB (2008) The nucleolus exhibits an osmotically regulated gatekeeping activity that controls the spatial dynamics and functions of nucleolin. J Biol Chem 283:11823–11831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Yoder TL, Zheng HQ, Todd P, Staehelin A (2001) Amyloplast sedimentation dynamics in maize columella cells support a new model for the gravity-sensing apparatus of root. Plant Physiol 125:1045–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Zonia L, Munnik T(2004)Osmotically induced cell swelling versus cell shrinking elicits specific changes in phospholipid signals in tobacco pollen tubes. Plant Physiol 134: 813–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Zonia L, Munnik T (2007) Life under pressure: hydrostatic pressure in cell growth and function. Trends Plant Sci 12:90–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Zonia L, Cordeiro S, Tupý J, Feijó JA (2002) Oscillatory chloride efflux at the pollen tube apex has a role in growth and cell volume regulation and is targeted by inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate. Plant Cell 14:2233–2249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Zonia L, Müller M, Munnik T (2006) Hydrodynamics and cell volume oscillations in the pollen tube apical region are integral components of the biomechanics of Nicotiana tabacum pollen tube growth. Cell Biochem Biophys 46:209–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Kasprowicz
    • 1
  • Daniel Kierzkowski
    • 1
  • Michalina Maruniewicz
    • 1
  • Marta Derba-Maceluch
    • 1
  • Ewelina Rodakowska
    • 1
  • Paweł Zawadzki
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Szuba
    • 2
  • Przemysław Wojtaszek
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology Faculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of SciencesPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations