Advertisement

Logistic Randomized Response Model

  • Zai-zai Yan
  • Peng-hao Ji
Part of the Advances in Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 54)

Abstract

Sensitive topics or highly personal questions are often faced in medical psychological and socio-economic survey. Warner’s pioneering randomized response (RR) device, as a method for reducing evasive answer bias while estimating the proportion of people in a community bearing a sensitive attribute, has been studied extensively over the last four decades. This paper proposes a new model (named the logistic model) for survey sampling with sensitive characteristics, and provides the suitable estimators for estimating an unknown proportion of people bearing a sensitive characteristic in a given community. That is a development for some existing research results concerning the randomized response theory. A numerical study comparing the performance of the proposed procedure and Warner’s (1965)[10]procedure is reported.

Keywords

Warner’s randomized response technique Sensitive variable Auxiliary variable Estimation of proportion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthony, Y.C.K.: Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77(2), 436–443 (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnab, R.: Randomized response surveys:estimation of a finite population total. Statistical Papers 39, 405–408 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaudhuri, A.: Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference 94, 37–42 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaudhuri, A., Mukerjee: Randomized Response: Theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horvitz, D.G., Shah, B.V., Simmons, W.R.: The unrelated question randomized response model. Proc. Statist. Sect. Am. Statist. Assoc., 65–72 (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, L.A., Simon, W.R., Horvitz, D.G.: The unrelated-question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 520–539 (1969)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manget, N.S., Singh, R.: An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77(2), 439–442 (1990)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourke, P.D., Moran, M.A.: Estimating proportions from randomized response data using the EM algorithm. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 83(404), 964–968 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh, S.: A new Stochastic randomized response model. Metrika 56, 131–142 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Warner, S.L.: Randomized response:a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 60, 63–69 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yanzaizai, Niezankan: A fair comparison of the randomized response strategies. Acta Mathematica Scientia 24A(3), 362–368 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fan, X., Wang, L.: Comparing linear discriminant function with logistic regression for the two-group classification problem. The Journal of Experimental Education 67(3), 265–286 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lei, P.-W., Koehly, L.M.: Linear discriminant analysis versus logistic regression: A comparison of classification errors. In: The 2000 Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan, Z.: Ratio method of estimation of population proportion using randomized response technique. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications 1(2), 125–130 (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zai-zai Yan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng-hao Ji
    • 1
  1. 1.Science College of Inner Mongolia university of technologyHohhotP.R. China
  2. 2.Management College of Inner Mongolia university of technologyHohhotP.R. China

Personalised recommendations