Advertisement

Design Research in University-Industry Collaborative Innovation: Experiences and Perspectives

  • Heinrich Arnold
  • Michael Erner
  • Peter Möckel
  • Christopher Schläffer
Chapter

Abstract

Design has been considered a driver of innovation for quite some time (Kelly 2003; Utterback et al. 2007; Center for Design Innovation 2007). Today, it is nothing new for many companies with leading innovation centers, such as Sony and Philips Research Labs, to have a design department. Design Research, however, is less widely practiced in innovation centers. The Design Research Lab within the Strategic Research-arm of Deutsche Telekom Laboratories acts as a partner driver in a university-industry collaborative research and innovation setting. Its subject matter, approaches, and methods are discussed in this section.

Keywords

Europe Kelly Glean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Centre for Design Innovation. 2007. The design difference: A survey of design and innovation amongst Ireland’s SMEs. http://www.designinnovation.ie/downloads/TheDesignDifference 2007.pdf (accessed on August 11, 2008).
  2. Chow, R. 2008. Case Transfer vs. Case Study: An Evaluation of Case Study as a Method for Design Research. Paper presented at Focused, the 2008 Symposium of the Swiss Design Network, May 30–31, in Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  3. Chow, R., and Jonas, W. 2008. Beyond Dualisms in Methodology: An Integrative Design Research Medium “MAPS” and some Reflections. Paper presented at Undisciplined, the 2008 Conference of the Design Research Society, July 16–19, in Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Findeli, A. 2008. Searching for Design Research Questions. Presented at the Question & Hypotheses Conference, October 25–26, in Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. Gaver, B., Dunne T., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. ACM 21–29.Google Scholar
  6. Hänsch, T., ed. 2007. 100 Produkte der Zukunft, 140–141. Berlin: Econ.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, L. M. 2008. University-Industry Research Collaboration: Advantages of the collaborative relationship and disadvantages of the collaborative relationship. http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2519/University-Industrial-Research-Collaboration.html (accessed on January 16, 2008).
  8. Kelly, T. 2003. The Art of Innovation. London; Profile Books.Google Scholar
  9. Rittel, H., and Webber, M. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–169. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc. [Reprinted in N. Cross, ed. 1984. Developments in Design Methodology, 135–144. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.]Google Scholar
  10. Utterback, J. et al. 2007. Design-inspired Innovation.. Singapore; World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinrich Arnold
    • 1
  • Michael Erner
    • 1
  • Peter Möckel
    • 1
  • Christopher Schläffer
    • 2
  1. 1.LaboratoriesDeutsche Telekom AGBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche Telekom AGBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations