Advertisement

Segmentation and Evaluation Tools to Project Customer Potential

  • Heinrich Arnold
  • Michael Erner
  • Peter Möckel
  • Christopher Schläffer
Chapter

Abstract

Selecting the most promising innovation project requires – among other criteria – a sufficient yet practicable indication about its market potential. This projection takes place in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) market, where costumer needs are becoming increasingly heterogeneous.

Companies make use of various approaches based on customer and market segmentations in order to reduce the complexity of markets by grouping consumers with similar product interests and buying behavior.

This section addresses socio-demographic as well as socio-cultural segmentations and discusses how they can be used in the process of innovation development and the projection of future customer potential.

Keywords

Income Marketing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, W.T.H. and Cunningham, W.H. 1972. Socially Conscious Consumer. J of Marketing 36(3): 22–31.Google Scholar
  2. Beane, T.P. and Ennis, D.M. 1987. Market Segmentation: A Review. European Journal of Marketing 21(5): 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brangule-Vlagsma, K., Pieters, R.G.M. and Wedel, M. 2002. The Dynamics of Value Segments: Modeling Framework and Empirical Illustration. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19: 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Distinction – A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, C.M. and Raynor, M.E. 2004. Marktorientierte Innovation – Geniale Produktideen für mehr Wachstum. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. DeSarbo, W.S., Degeratu, A.M., Ahearne, M.J. and Saxton, M.K. 2002. Disaggregate Market Share Response Models. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellen, P.S. 1994. Do We Know What We Need to Know? Objective and Subjective Knowledge Effects on Pro-ecological Behaviors. Journal of Business Research 30(1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission. 2007. Eurobarometer Survey: Safer Internet for children – Qualitative Study in 29 European Countries Google Scholar
  9. Geißler, R. 2002. Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands. Wiesbaden, Bonn: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. González, A.M. and Bello, L. 2002. The Construct “Lifestyle” in Market Segmentation. The Behaviour of Tourist Consumers. European Journal of Marketing 36(1/2): 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grover, R. and Srinivasan, V. 1987. A Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring. Journal of Marketing Research XXIV: 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heiskanen, E., Hyvönen, K., Niva, M., Pantzar, M., Timonen, P. and Varjonen, J. 2007. User Involvement in Radical Innovation: are Consumers Conservative? European Journal of Innovation management 10: 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kotler, P., Wong, V., Sauders, J. and Armstrong, G. 2007. Principles of Marketing: An Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Kotler, P. 1980. Principles of Marketing, 291–309. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Lüthje, C. 2003. Methoden zur Sicherstellung von Kundenorientierung in den frühen Phasen des Innovationsprozesses. Management der frühen Innovationsphasen. Grundlagen – Methoden – Neue Ansätze, eds. Herstatt, C. and Verworn, B., 35–57. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  16. Manner, L. and Miller, S.J. 1978. An Examination of the Value-Attitude Structure in the Study of Donor Behaviour. Proc. of the American Institute of Decision Sciences, St. Louis, American Institute for Decision Sciences, vol. 12, 532–538.Google Scholar
  17. Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rokeach, M. and Ball-Rokeach, S.J. 1989. Stability and Change in American Value Priorities, 1968–1981. American Psychologist 44(5): 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. SevenOne Media. 2001. Semiometrie. Der Zielgruppe auf der Spur. Unterföhring: SevenOne Media GmbH.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, W.R. 1956. Product Differentiation and Market Segmentations as Alternative Market Strategies. Journal of Marketing 211: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sagiv, L. and Schwartz, S. H. 1995. Value Priorities and Readiness for Out-Group Social Contact. Journal of Social Psychology and Social Psychology 69(3): 437–488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinrich Arnold
    • 1
  • Michael Erner
    • 1
  • Peter Möckel
    • 1
  • Christopher Schläffer
    • 2
  1. 1.LaboratoriesDeutsche Telekom AGBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche Telekom AGBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations