An Environmental Monitoring System with Integrated Wired and Wireless Sensors

  • Jue Yang
  • Chengyang Zhang
  • Xinrong Li
  • Yan Huang
  • Shengli Fu
  • Miguel Acevedo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5258)


Wireless sensor networks (WSN) technology has great potential to revolutionize many science and engineering domains. We present a novel environmental monitoring system with a focus on the overall system architecture for seamless integration of wired and wireless sensors for long-term, remote, and near-real-time monitoring. We also present a unified framework for sensor data collection, management, visualization, dissemination, and exchange, conforming to the new Sensor Web Enablement standard. Some initial field testing results are also presented.


Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Sensor Data Exponential Weighted Moving Average Medium Access Control Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Culler, D., Estrin, D., Srivastava, M.: Overview of sensor networks. IEEE Computer, 41–49 (August 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martinez, K., Hart, J.K., Ong, R.: Environmental sensor networks. IEEE Computer, 50–56 (August 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Culler, D., Anderson, J.: Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In: Proc. of the ACM Int’l Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA) (September 2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MoteLab: Harvard Sensor Network Testbed,
  5. 5.
    ExScal: Extreme Scale Wireless Sensor Networking,
  6. 6.
    Kansei: Sensor Testbed for At-Scale Experiments,
  7. 7.
    CitySense: An Open, Urban-Scale Sensor Network Testbed,
  8. 8.
    SCADDS: Scalable Coordination Architectures for Deeply Distributed Systems,
  9. 9.
    Texas Environmental Observatory,
  10. 10.
    Cheng, S., Wang, R.: An approach for evaluating the hydrological effects of urbanization and its application. Hydrological Processes 16, 1403–1418 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sensor Web Enablement WG, OGC Inc.,
  12. 12.
    Crossbow Inc.,
  13. 13.
    Harrington, B., Huang, Y.: A two round reporting approach to energy efficient interpolation of sensor fields. In: Papadias, D., Zhang, D., Kollios, G. (eds.) SSTD 2007. LNCS, vol. 4605, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D.: An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 21st Int’l Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), vol. 3, pp. 1567–1576 (June 2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maroti, M., Kusy, B., Simon, G., Ledeczi, A.: The flooding time synchronization protocol. In: Proc. of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys) (November 2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woo, A., Tong, T., Culler, D.: Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In: Proc. of the Int’l Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys) (November 2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Technologic Systems Inc.,
  18. 18.
    NovaLynx Corporation, Power Budget Calculations,
  19. 19.
    SensorML, UAH VAST,
  20. 20.
    Keyhole Markup Language, Google,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jue Yang
    • 1
  • Chengyang Zhang
    • 1
  • Xinrong Li
    • 1
  • Yan Huang
    • 1
  • Shengli Fu
    • 1
  • Miguel Acevedo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations