Zusammenfassung
Der Erwerb von Wissen (»knowledge acquisiton«) ist wohl die wichtigste Zieldimension der meisten Bildungsprozesse. Wird im Kontext von Schule, Hochschule und Weiterbildung der Begriff »Lernen« gebraucht, so bezieht er sich typischerweise auf Wissenserwerb. Insofern wird im Folgenden Lernen synonym mit Wissenserwerb gebraucht.
Zu gelungenem Wissenserwerb trägt eine Vielzahl von Faktoren bei. Dieser Beitrag konzentriert sich auf das Was und Wie des Wissenserwerbs aus kognitiver Perspektive. Man kann sagen, nur die proximal am Wissenserwerb beteiligten Faktoren und Prozesse werden betrachtet. Für andere wichtige Faktoren, die hier nur am Rande oder gar nicht behandelt werden können, etwa Vorwissen und Intelligenz (► Kap. 2), Selbststeuerung der Lernenden (► Kap. 3), Motivation (► Kap. 7 und 8) oder Unterricht (► Kap. 4, 5 und 6), wird auf die entsprechenden Kapitel dieses Lehrbuchs verwiesen.
Im Folgenden wird zunächst die Frage geklärt, welche Wissensarten in diesem Zusammenhang von besonderer Bedeutung sind (► Abschn. 1.1). In ► Abschn. 1.2 werden drei grundlegende theoretische Perspektiven rekonstruiert und deren Implikationen für die Analyse und Förderung des Wissenserwerbs diskutiert. Wichtige Lernarten werden in ► Abschn. 1.3 besprochen. Abschließend wird noch kurz das Verhältnis zwischen Lernprozessen und Instruktion (Unterricht, instruktionales Design von Lernmaterial und Lernumgebungen) erörtert.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Weiterführende Literatur
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M. & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Literatur
Aamodt, A., & Nygård, M. (1995). Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge – An AI perspective on their integration. Data & Knowledge Engineering , 16, 191–222.
Ainsworth, S. E., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of selfexplaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681.
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computerbased Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179.
Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: the interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10, 213–250.
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, G., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Aroyo, L., Graesser, A., & Johnson, L. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction: Intelligent educational systems of the present and future. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22, 20–21.
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Combining fading with prompting fosters learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774–783.
Baddeley, A. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barab, S., IngramGoble, A., Gresalfi, M., Arici, A., Siyahhan, S., Dodge, T., & Hay, K. (2008). Conceptual play spaces and the quest Atlantis project. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, & F. J. Prins (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2008. Utrecht, NL: ICLS.
Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (in Druck). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Selfexplaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Selfexplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and matematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in shortterm memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
de Jong, T. (2005). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 215–228). New York: Cambridge University Press
de Jong, T., & FergusonHessler, M. G. H. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31, 105–113.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W.R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
Derry, S. J. (1999). A fish called peer learning: Searching for common themes. In A. O Donnell & A. King (Eds.),Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 197211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deutsches PISAKonsortium (Hrsg.). (2001). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Doise, W. (1990). The development of individual competencies through social interaction. In H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan & R. H. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 43–64). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615–622.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & TeschRömer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Fischer, F. (2002). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion – Theoretische und methodologische Aspekte. Psychologische Rundschau, 53, 119–134.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning – cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning – The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 405–441.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of »seductive details« on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41–57.
Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 7996). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gruber, H., Renkl, A., & Schneider, W. (1994). Expertise und Gedächtnisentwicklung: Längsschnittliche Befunde aus der Domäne Schach. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 53–70.
Hasselhorn, M. (2006). Metakognition. In D. H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 480–485). Weinheim: Beltz.
HmeloSilver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problembased and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 558–568.
Khine, M. S. (Eds.) (2008). Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer.
Kintsch, E., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text. In E. de Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 519– 524). Exeter, UK: Pergamon.
Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2006). Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen (Überarbeitete Fassung des Antrags an die DFG auf Einrichtung eines Schwerpunktprogramms). Frankfurt: DIPF.
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with Cognitive Tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239–264.
Koedinger, K., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive Tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–77). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Krause, U.M. & Stark, R. (2006). Vorwissen aktivieren. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Hrsg.), Handbuch Lernstrategien (S. 38–49). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
Lehman, S., Shraw, G., McCrudden, M., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientic text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569–587.
Lesgold, A. M., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P. J., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing Xray pictures. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandl, H., & Friedrich, H. F. (2006). Handbuch Lernstrategien. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1993). Misconceptions and knowledge compartmentalization. In G. Strube & K. F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge: The German Wissenspsychologie project (pp. 161–176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a threestrikesrule against pure discovery learning? A case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319–334.
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: good texts can be better for strategic, highknowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121– 152.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
Pauli, C., & Lipowsky, F. (2007). Mitmachen oder zuhören? Mündliche Schülerinnenund Schülerbeteiligung im Mathematikunterricht. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 35, 101–124.
PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Hrsg.). (2007). PISA 2006 – Die Ergebnis der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie. Münster: Waxmann.
Renkl, A. (1996b). Träges Wissen: Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 78–92.
Renkl, A. (1997a). Learning from workedout examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.
Renkl, A. (1997b). Lernen durch Lehren. Zentrale Wirkmechanismen beim kooperativen Lernen. Wiesbaden: DUV.
Renkl, A. (2001). Situated learning, out of school and in the classroom. In P. B. Baltes & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (vol. 21, pp. 14133–14137). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Renkl, A. (2005). The workedoutexample principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (S. 229–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Renkl, A. (2008)a. Kooperatives Lernen. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Handbuch Psychologie, Bd. Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 84–94). Göttingen. Hogrefe.
Renkl, A. (2008b). Lehren und Lernen im Kontext der Schule. In A. Renkl (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 109–153). Bern: Huber.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15–22.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 235–238.
Renkl, A., & Beisiegel, S. (2003). Lernen in Gruppen: Ein Minihandbuch. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
Renkl, A., Schworm, S., & Hilbert, T. S. (2004). Lernen aus Lösungsbeispielen: Eine effektive, aber kaum genutzte Möglichkeit, Unterricht zu gestalten. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Hrsg.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (S. 77–92). Münster: Waxmann.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from workedout examples: The effects of example variability and elicited selfexplanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108.
Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Schema formation in analogical reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 529–538.
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209– 1224.
Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (in press). The workedexample effect using illdefined problems: Learning to recognise designers’ style. Learning and Instruction.
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Selfexplanation in a multimedia context. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computermediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 201–241.
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2008). Lernen in Multimedia: Die kognitiven Grundlagen des Modalitätseffekts. Psychologische Rundschau, 59,98–108.
Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2007). The effect of experimental manipulation of student motivation on the situational representation of text.Learning and Instruction, 17, 755–772.
Schmidt, H. G., de Grave, W. S., De Volder, M. L., Moust, J. H.C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through smallgroup discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 610– 619.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W. (2006). Textverständnis. In D. H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (3. Aufl., S. 769778). Weinheim: Beltz.
Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, K., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (in press). The workedexample effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for selfexplaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285–296.
Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover strategies. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 8697.
Stahl, G., Koshmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (S. 409–425). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J. J. G. van, & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tamir, P. (1996). Discovery learning and teaching. In E. de Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 355–361). Exeter, UK: Pergamon.
Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.
van Dijk, T. A., & W. Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 111–119.
VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K. Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 15, 1–47.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2005). The fourcomponent instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 71–93). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van HoutWolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1. 3–14.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & de Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
vom Hofe, R. (2001): Mathematik entdecken neue Argumente für entdeckendes Lernen. mathematik lehren, 105, 4–8.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction , 17, 416–426.
Weinstein, C. F., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edn., pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renkl, A. (2009). Wissenserwerb. In: Wild, E., Möller, J. (eds) Pädagogische Psychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88573-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88573-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88572-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88573-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)