Advertisement

OntoNaviERP: Ontology-Supported Navigation in ERP Software Documentation

  • Martin Hepp
  • Andreas Wechselberger
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5318)

Abstract

The documentation of Enterprise Research Planning (ERP) systems is usually (1) extremely large and (2) combines various views from the business and the technical implementation perspective. Also, a very specific vocabulary has evolved, in particular in the SAP domain (e.g. SAP Solution Maps or SAP software module names). This vocabulary is not clearly mapped to business management terminology and concepts. It is a well-known problem in practice that searching in SAP ERP documentation is difficult, because it requires in-depth knowledge of a large and proprietary terminology. We propose to use ontologies and automatic annotation of such large HTML software documentation in order to improve the usability and accessibility, namely of ERP help files. In order to achieve that, we have developed an ontology and prototype for SAP ERP 6.0. Our approach integrates concepts and lexical resources from (1) business management terminology, (2) SAP business terminology, (3) SAP system terminology, and (4) Wordnet synsets. We use standard GATE/KIM technology to annotate SAP help documentation with respective references to our ontology. Eventually, our approach consolidates the knowledge contained in the SAP help functionality at a conceptual level. This allows users to express their queries using a terminology they are familiar with, e.g. referring to general management terms. Despite a widely automated ontology construction process and a simplistic annotation strategy with minimal human intervention, we experienced convincing results. For an average query linked to an action and a topic, our technology returns more than 3 relevant resources, while a naïve term-based search returns on average only about 0.2 relevant resources.

Keywords

Business Object Annotation Strategy Entity Recognition Lexical Variant Ontology Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Popov, B., Kiryakov, A., Kirilov, A., Manov, D., Ognyanoff, D., Goranov, M.: KIM - Semantic Annotation Platform. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabou, M.: Extracting Ontologies from Software Documentation: a Semi-Automatic Method and its Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ambrósio, A.P., Santos, D.C.d., Lucena, F.N.d., Silva, J.C.d.: Software Engineering Documentation: an Ontology-based Approach. In: Proceedings of the WebMedia & LA-Web 2004 Joint Conference, Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Witte, R., Zhang, Y., Rilling, J.: Empowering Software Maintainers with Semantic Web Technologies. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B.: Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, vol. 123. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hepp, M., Leymann, F., Domingue, J., Wahler, A., Fensel, D.: Semantic Business Process Management: A Vision Towards Using Semantic Web Services for Business Process Management. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2005), Beijing, China (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hepp, M., Roman, D.: An Ontology Framework for Semantic Business Process Management. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik 2007, Karlsruhe (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bast, H., Chitea, A., Suchanek, F., Weber, I.: ESTER: Efficient Search on Text, Entities, and Relations. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bast, H., Weber, I.: The CompleteSearch Engine: Interactive, Efficient, and Towards IR&DB Integration. In: Proceedings of CIDR 2007, Asilomar, CA, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bast, H., Majumdar, D., Weber, I.: Efficient Interactive Query Expansion with Complete Search. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2007, Lisboa, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soffer, P., Golany, B., Dori, D.: ERP modeling: a comprehensive approach. Information Systems 28, 673–690 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knackstedt, R., Winkelmann, A., Becker, J.: Dynamic Alignment of ERP Systems and their Documentations. An Approach for Documentation Quality Improvement. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007), Keystone, CO, USA (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Hepp
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andreas Wechselberger
    • 1
  1. 1.E-Business and Web Science Research GroupBundeswehr University MunichGermany
  2. 2.Semantics in Business Information Systems GroupSTI, University of InnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations