Accelerating Technology Adoption Through Community Endorsement
- 418 Downloads
The idea that cross-discipline data interuse is a necessity for Earth systems science studies is now widely accepted, but data interoperability has been an elusive goal. The remote sensing community has a talented cohort of innovative developers of data and information technologies. However, despite the high level of innovation, progress on wide scale practical interuse has not been as rapid as expected. The usefulness of data interuse technologies requires adoption of these same visionary technologies on a wide scale. Thus, adoption of technologies to enable wider interdisciplinary investigation faces challenges similar to those for adoption of technology products in the commercial marketplace. Bringing a new technology from innovative use by visionary practitioners to popular use by more pragmatically oriented users has come to be called “crossing the chasm”.
NASA’s Earth Science Data Systems Working Group has been applying communications methodologies to bridge this adoption chasm within the agency. We have developed a process inspired by the successful model of the Internet “Request for Comments”. The central idea of the RFC is notification to the wider community of specific detailed ideas that potentially affect interoperation of data and services though the Internet. Sharing ideas through the RFC mechanism has spurred adoption of Internet technologies and fostered collaboration in the development of Internet standards. NASA’s Standards Process Group (SPG) seeks the same result in the domain of Earth science data systems.
KeywordsComponent Best practices Standards
- D. Coetzee, File:Network effect.png, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Network_effect.png#filehistory, January 2006 [July 9, 2009].
- J. de La Beaujardière, (Ed). “Web Map Service Implementation Specification” OGC Document #01-068r3, Wayland, MA:Open GIS Consortium, Inc January 2002.Google Scholar
- A. Doyle, WWW Mapping Framework, OGC Document #97-009, Wayland, MA: Open GIS Consortium, Inc April 1997.Google Scholar
- J. Gallagher, Not Your Standard Deal: OPeNDAP’s Positive Experience with NASA ESDS SPG. Presented at the NASA ES-DSWG SPG meeting. San Diego. June 15 2005. Internet: http://spg.gsfc.nasa.gov/spgfolder/events/esdswg-meeting-june-15-2005/opendap.pdf [Apr. 20, 2006]
- T. Habermann, Innovation, Standards, and Mature Organizations, Presented at the NASA ES-DSWG SPG Meeting, College Park, MD. November 15, 2006.Google Scholar
- M. Maiden, et al. NEWDISS A 6-To 10-Year Approach to Data Systems and Services for NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise, Washington, DC: NASA, 2002.Google Scholar
- G. Milkowski, DODS: “Providing Direct Access to Distributed Research Data Resources.” Oceanography (ISSN 1042-8275), Rockville, MD: The Oceanography Society, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1995Google Scholar
- G.A. Moore. Crossing the Chasm, Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers (revised edition). New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
- NASA ES-DSWG. “Earth Science Data System Working Group.” Internet: http://www.esdswg.org/spg Jan. 12, 2006 [Apr. 20, 2006].
- NASA Standards Process Group. “NASA Earth Science Data Systems SPG – Portal.” Internet: http://www.esdswg.org/spg Jan. 06, 2006 [Apr. 20, 2006].
- OGC. “OGC History (abbreviated).” Internet: http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/history. Wayland, MA: The Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. July 19, 2006. [Sep. 15, 2008]
- E.M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations (4th edition). New York: The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- R. Ullman and M. Tsou. NASA’s Earth Science Data Systems Working Group Standards Endorsement Process, A Community of Practice Approach to Standards that Work. Presented at the National Forum for Geosciences Information Technology, Washington DC, October 6, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. Wharton, et al. Strategic Evolution of Earth Science Enterprise Data Systems (SEEDS) Formulation Team Final Recommendations Report. Greenbelt, MD: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2003.Google Scholar