Skip to main content

How Can the European Union Transform the Greek–Turkish Conflict?

  • Chapter

By bridging ‘rational-institutionalist’ and ‘constructivist’ accounts, this chapter aims to explore the impact the European Union (EU) has had and, most importantly, is expected to have on the management and/or transformation of the long-standing Greek-Turkish territorial dispute. The main argument is that the EU could play a promising role and change the interests and/or the identity scripts of the conflict parties if two particular conditions are fulfilled. The first refers to the strength of the norms that the EU exerts on the conflict parties and the legitimacy and credibility the EU enjoys vis-à-vis the parties in conflict. The second refers to the ‘type of socialization’ the EU mechanisms produce. In other words, it does matter whether the institutional mechanisms - by which the EU seeks to attain domestic salience and legitimacy - are directed only towards the conflict parties’ elites, or towards the conflict parties’ elites as well as their publics and societies, as a ‘thorough’ internalisation of institutional rules and norms, and not only by the elites, is a crucial determinant for the positive transformation of the Greek-Turkish dispute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bac, M. M. (2005). Turkey's political reforms and the impact of the European Union. South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, B. A., & Rumelili, B. (2006). Necessary but not sufficient: The role of the EU in resolving Turkey's Kurdish question and the Greek—Turkish conflicts. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11(2), 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. (1999). Why comply? Constructivism, social norms and the study of international institutions (Working Paper No. 24). Oslo, Norway: ARENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (Ed.) (2005). Special issue on international institutions and socialization in Europe. International Organization, 59(4), 860–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortell, P. A., & Davis, W. J. (2000). Understanding the domestic impact of international norms: A research agenda. International Studies Review, 2(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couloumbis, T. (1994). Introduction: The impact of EC membership on Greece's foreign policy profile. In P. Kazakos & P. C. Ioakimidis (Eds.), Greece and EC membership evaluated (pp. 189–198). London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., Stetter, S., & Albert, M. (2006). The European Union and border conflicts: The transformative power of integration. International Organization, 60(3), 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (1999). Helsinki European Council: Presidency Conclusions (SN 300/99), 10–11 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1999). International norm dynamics and political change. In P. J. Katzenstein, R. O. Keohane, & S. D. Krasner (Eds.), Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Affairs and External Relations Council. (1996). The declaration adopted by the fifteen ministers of foreign affairs of the EU (SN 3543/96). Brussels, Belgium, 15 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, A. (2005). Security institutions as agents of socialization? NATO and the ‘New Europe‘. International Organization, 59(4), 973–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guvenc, S. (1998/1999). Turkey's changing perception of Greece's membership in the European Union. Turkish Review of Balkan Studies, 4, 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, A. C. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1986). Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization, 40(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirisçi, K., & Carkoglu, A. (2003). Perceptions of Greeks and Greek—Turkish rapprochement by the Turkish public. In B. Rubin & A. Carkoglu (Eds.), Greek–Turkish relations in an era of détente. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, H. (1987). Turkish application for accession to the European Community and the Greek factor. Europa Archiv, 42(10), 605–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, A. C., & Kupchan, A. C. (1991). Concerts, collective security and the future of Europe. International Security, 16(1), 114–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., & Simmons, B. (2001). Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. In L. Martin & B. Simmons (Eds.), International institutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinardus, R. (1991). Third-party involvement in Greek—Turkish disputes. In D. Constas (Ed.), The Greek—Turkish conflict in the 1990s: Domestic and external influences (pp. 157–163). New York: St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Z. (2003). Domestic politics, international norms and challenges to the state: Turkey—EU relations in the post-Helsinki era. Turkish Studies, 4(1), 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, M. (2005). EU policy-making towards border conflicts. University of Birmingham, Department of Political Science and International Studies, Working Paper Series in EU Border Conflicts Studies, 15. Retrieved from http://www.euborderconf.bham.ac.uk/publications/files/ WP15_EU.pdf.

  • Rumelili, B. (2003). Liminality and perpetuation of conflicts: Turkish—Greek relations in the context of community-building by the EU. European Journal of International Relations, 9(2), 213–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. (2004a). The European Union's impact on the Greek—Turkish conflict: A review of the literature. Working Paper Series in EU Border Conflicts Series, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. (2004b). The microprocesses of hegemonic influence: The case of EU and Greece/Turkey. EUBORDERCONF Project, Boğaziçi University, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, B. (2005). Civil society and the Europeanization of Greek–Turkish cooperation. South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2000). International socialization in the new Europe: Rational action in an institutional environment. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2002). Introduction: The impact of international organizations on the Central and Eastern European States — Conceptual and theoretical issues. In R. Linden (Ed.), Norms and nannies: The impact of international organizations on the Central and East European States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2005). Strategic calculation and international socialization: Membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization, 59(4), 827–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephanou, C., & Tsardanides, C. (1991). The EC factor in the Greece—Turkey—Cyprus triangle. In D. Constas (Ed.), The Greek—Turkish conflict in the 1990s: Domestic and external influences (pp. 207–230). New York: St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakonas, P. (2001). Turkey's post-Helsinki turbulence: Implications for Greece and the Cyprus issue. Journal of Turkish Studies, 2(2), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakonas, P. (forthcoming). The incomplete breakthrough in Greek–Turkish relations: Grasping Greece's socialization strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, M. (1999). The European Union and Turkey: An anchor/credibility dilemma. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valinakis, Y. (1997). With vision and program: Foreign policy for a Greece with self-confidence. Thessaloniki, Greece: Paratiritis [in Greek].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A., & Duvall, R. (1989). Institutions and international order. In E. Czempiel & J. Rosenau (Eds.), Global changes and theoretical challenges: Approaches to world politics for the 1990s. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Constantinos Karamanlis Institute for Democracy, Athens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsakonas, P.J. (2009). How Can the European Union Transform the Greek–Turkish Conflict?. In: Arvanitopoulos, C. (eds) Turkey's Accession to the European Union. The Constantinos Karamanlis Institute for Democracy Series on European and International Affairs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88197-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics