Skip to main content

Combination of Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies with Self-adaptive Switching

  • Chapter
Multi-Objective Memetic Algorithms

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 171))

  • 1277 Accesses

Abstract

For tackling an multi-objective optimization problem (MOP), evolutionary computation (EC) gathers much attention due to its population-based approach where several solutions can be obtained simultaneously. Since genetic algorithm (GA) and evolution strategy (ES) are often used in EC, we discuss only GA and ES in this chapter. Although both of them have global and local search capability, theoretical/empirical analysis reveals that GA is rather global search and ES is rather local search on MOP. These facts are related to how to generate offspring, i.e. crossover in GA and mutation in ES. On MOP, the crossover in GA and the mutation in ES generate differently distributed offspring. If mating in the crossover is not restricted, the crossover in GA can generate new offspring globally due to combination of parents which converge different points. Oppositely, the mutation in ES can generate the similar offspring with parent, i.e. locally distributed new offspring, because the offspring is generated by adding normally distributed random values to the parent. Recently, memetic algorithm, which combines GA with local search algorithm, is popular due to its performance. Since ES on MOP works as local search, we combine GA with ES as one of memetic algorithms in this chapter. This algorithm is called as hybrid representation. Several issues caused by the combination of GA and ES are discussed, e.g. the discretization error, self-adaptation and adaptive switching. Experiments are conducted on five well-known test functions using six different performance indices. The results show that the hybrid representation exhibits better and more stable performance than the original GA/ES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coello, C.A.C., Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.lania.mx/~ccoello/EMOO/

  3. Deb, K., Agrawal, R.B.: Simulated Binary Crossover for Continuous Search Space. Complex Systems 9, 115–148 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. Technical Report 200001, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory (KanGAL), Kanpur (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons LTD, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Anand, A., Joshi, D.: A Computationally Efficient Evolutionary Algorithms for Real-parameter Optimisation. Technical Report 2002003, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory (KanGAL), Kanpur (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eshelman, L.J., Schaffer, J.D.: Real-coded Genetic Algorithms and Interval-schemata. In: Proceedings of Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, vol. 2, pp. 187–202 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fogel, L.J.: Autonomous Automata. Industrial Research 4, 14–19 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, M.P., Jaszkiewicz, A.: Evaluating the quality of approximations to the nondominated set. Technical Report IMM-REP-1998-7, Institute of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles, J., Corne, D.: On Metrics for Comparing Nondominated Sets. In: Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), pp. 711–716 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Okabe, T., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B.: On the Dynamics of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimisation. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2002), pp. 247–255 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okabe, T., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B.: A Critical Survey of Performance Indices for Multi-Objective Optimisation. In: Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2003), pp. 878–885 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okabe, T.: Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization - On the Distribution of Offspring in Parameter and Fitness Space. Sharker Verlag (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ono, I., Kobayashi, S.: A Real-coded Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization Using Unimodal Normal Distribution Crossover. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 246–253 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rechenberg, I.: Evolutionsstrategie 1994, Frommann-Holzboog (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results. Evolutionary Computation 8(2), 173–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Fonseca, C.M., Grunert da Fonseca, V.: Why Quality Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers Is Difficult. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pp. 666–673 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Grunert da Fonseca, V.: Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Okabe, T., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B. (2009). Combination of Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies with Self-adaptive Switching. In: Goh, CK., Ong, YS., Tan, K.C. (eds) Multi-Objective Memetic Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88051-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88051-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88050-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88051-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics