Advertisement

External-Beam Partial Breast Irradiation: The New York University Prone Technique

  • Silvia Formenti
  • Stella Lymberis

Partial breast irradiation performed using external-beam techniques in the prone position has many advantages. In addition to the many advantages associated with the use of a hypofractionated regimen delivered by an external beam, positioning the patient in the prone position often displaces the tumor bed target away from the chest wall, enabling better sparing of lungs and heart. Originally developed at the University of Southern California, prone external-beam partial breast irradiation (prone EB-PBI) was further perfected at New York University, and has confirmed its feasibility and convenience to the patient. Some of the advantages associated with the technique we have developed have resulted in a significant reduction in interfraction variability. For instance, the advantage of using only five fractions also demands very accurate alignment during treatment. Moreover, since the utilization of prone positioning drastically reduces the intrafraction movement associated with respiration, it has been possible to reduce the margins of the planning target volume (PTV), which requires high targeted delivery precision. To address this challenge of precise positioning, our group has pilot-tested the use of image-guided prone EB-PBI. This review describes the clinical evolution of prone EB-PBI and introduces preliminary experiences of using cone-beam CT image guidance with the Varian On-Board Imager kV imaging system daily.

Keywords

Planning Target Volume Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Cone Beam Compute Tomography Clinical Target Volume Accelerate Partial Breast Irradiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barendsen GW (1982) Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8(11): 1981–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker SJ, Patela RR, Mackie TR (2006) Accelerated partial breast irradiation with helical tomo-therapy: prone or supine setup? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(3):S230Google Scholar
  3. Bentzen SM et al. (2008) The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 9(4):331–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner DJ, Sachs RK (2006) Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Radiat Environ Biophys 44(4):253–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen P Y, Vicini FA (2007) Partial breast irradiation. Patient selection, guidelines for treatment, and current results. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 40:253–71Google Scholar
  7. Clarke M et al. (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeWyngaert JK, Mitchella JD, Alonso-Basanta M, Formenti SC (2006) Intrafraction organ motion in breast radiation therapy: a comparison of prone versus supine patient positioning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(3):S177–8Google Scholar
  9. el-Fallah AI, Plantec MB, Ferrara KW (1997) Ultrasonic measurement of breast tissue motion and the implications for velocity estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 23(7):1047–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellerin BE, Seidenfeld J, Formenti SC (2004) A systematic review of post-lumpectomy radiation therapy regimens. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:47Google Scholar
  11. Fatunase T et al. (2008) Assessment of the residual error in soft tissue setup in patients undergoing partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective study using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(4):1025–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher B et al. (2002) Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less. J Clin Oncol 20(20):4141–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher B et al. (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Formenti SC et al. (2002) T1 stage breast cancer: adjuvant hypofractionated conformal radiation therapy to tumor bed in selected postmenopausal breast cancer patients: pilot feasibility study. Radiology 222(1):171–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Formenti SC et al. (2004) Prone accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery: preliminary clinical results and dose—volume histogram analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(2):493–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Formenti SC (2005) External beam partial-breast irradiation. Semin Radiat Oncol 15(2):92–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Formenti SC (2007) External-beam-based partial breast irradiation. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(6):326–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fyles A, McCready D, Manchul L (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized study of tamoxifen + /− breast radiation in T1/2 N0 disease in women over 50 years of age. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:24a (Abstr 92)Google Scholar
  19. Hebert-Croteau N et al. (1999) Compliance with consensus recommendations for the treatment of early stage breast carcinoma in elderly women. Cancer 85(5):1104–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joslyn SA (1999) Radiation therapy and patient age in the survival from early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(4):821–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jozsef G. Luxton G, Formenti SC (2000) Application of radiosurgery principles to a target in the breast: a dosimetric study. Med Phys 27(5):1005–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerner JF et al. (2001) Screening mammography and breast cancer treatment patterns in older women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69(1):81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim LH, Wong J, Yan D (2007) On-line localization of the lumpectomy cavity using surgical clips. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(4):1305–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim M et al. (2006) A prospective study of conservative surgery without radiation therapy in select patients with Stage I breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(4):1149–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrow NV et al. (2007) Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(3):910–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenstein BS, Lymberis SC, Formenti SC (2004) Biologic comparison of partial breast irradiation protocols. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(5):1393–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sachs RK et al. (2007) Second cancers after fractionated radiotherapy: stochastic population dynamics effects. J Theor Biol 249(3):518–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steel GG et al. (1987) The dose-rate effect in human tumour cells. Radiother Oncol 9(4):299–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suh WW et al. (2005) A cost comparison analysis of partial versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(3):790–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wernicke AG, Gidea-Addeo D, Magnolfi C, Fenton-Kerimian M, Goldberg J, Formenti SC (2006) External beam partial breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery: preliminary results of cosmetic outcome of NYU 00-23. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(3):S32Google Scholar
  31. White EA et al. (2007) Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(2):547–54PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyNew York University School of Medicine, Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations