Skip to main content

Measuring the Ignorance and Degree of Satisfaction for Answering Queries in Imprecise Probabilistic Logic Programs

  • Conference paper
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5291))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In probabilistic logic programming, given a query, either a probability interval or a precise probability obtained by using the maximum entropy principle is returned for the query. The former can be noninformative (e.g., interval [0,1]) and the reliability of the latter is questionable when the priori knowledge is imprecise. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose some methods to quantitatively measure if a probability interval or a single probability is sufficient for answering a query. We first propose an approach to measuring the ignorance of a probabilistic logic program with respect to a query. The measure of ignorance (w.r.t. a query) reflects how reliable a precise probability for the query can be and a high value of ignorance suggests that a single probability is not suitable for the query. We then propose a method to measure the probability that the exact probability of a query falls in a given interval, e.g., a second order probability. We call it the degree of satisfaction. If the degree of satisfaction is high enough w.r.t. the query, then the given interval can be accepted as the answer to the query. We also provide properties of the two measures and use an example to demonstrate the significance of the measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kern-Isberner, G., Lukasiewicz, T.: Combining probabilistic logic programming with the power of maximum entropy. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 139–202 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming. In: ECAI, pp. 388–392 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming with conditional constraints. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 2(3), 289–339 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray, R.M.: Entropy and information theory. Springer, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, V.S., Page, D., Qazi, M., Cussens, J.: CLP(\({\mathcal{BN}}\)): Constraint logic programming for probabilistic knowledge. In: UAI, pp. 517–524 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baral, C., Gelfond, M., Rushton, J.N.: Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2923, pp. 21–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baral, C., Hunsaker, M.: Using the probabilistic logic programming language p-log for causal and counterfactual reasoning and non-naive conditioning. In: IJCAI, pp. 243–249 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saad, E.: Qualitative and quantitative reasoning in hybrid probabilistic logic programs. In: ISIPTA 2007 - Fifth International Symposium On Imprecise Probability: Theories And Applications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raedt, L.D., Kimmig, A., Toivonen, H.: Problog: A probabilistic prolog and its application in link discovery. In: IJCAI, pp. 2462–2467 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fuhr, N.: Probabilistic datalog: Implementing logical information retrieval for advanced applications. JASIS 51(2), 95–110 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dekhtyar, A., Dekhtyar, M.I.: Possible worlds semantics for probabilistic logic programs. In: ICLP, pp. 137–148 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming under inheritance with overriding. In: UAI, pp. 329–336 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lukasiewicz, T.: Weak nonmonotonic probabilistic logics. Artif. Intell. 168(1-2), 119–161 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lukasiewicz, T.: Nonmonotonic probabilistic logics under variable-strength inheritance with overriding: Complexity, algorithms, and implementation. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 44(3), 301–321 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rödder, W., Kern-Isberner, G.: From information to probability: An axiomatic approach - inference isinformation processing. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18(4), 383–403 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rödder, W.: On the measurability of knowledge acquisition, query processing. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 33(2), 203–218 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yue, A., Liu, W., Hunter, A. (2008). Measuring the Ignorance and Degree of Satisfaction for Answering Queries in Imprecise Probabilistic Logic Programs. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87993-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87993-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87992-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87993-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics