Advertisement

Managing Sensor Data on Urban Traffic

  • Claudia Bauzer Medeiros
  • Marc Joliveau
  • Geneviève Jomier
  • Florian De Vuyst
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5232)

Abstract

Sensor data on traffic events have prompted a wide range of research issues, related with the so-called ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems). Data are delivered for both static (fixed) and mobile (embarked) sensors, generating large and complex spatio-temporal series. Research efforts in handling these data range from pattern matching and data mining techniques (for forecasting and trend analysis) to work on database queries (e.g., to construct scenarios). Work on embarked sensors also considers issues on trajectories and moving objects.

This paper presents a new kind of framework to manage static sensor data. Our work is based on combining research on analytical methods to process sensor data, and database procedures to query these data. The first component is geared towards supporting pattern matching, whereas the second deals with spatio-temporal database issues. This allows distinct granularities and modalities of analysis of sensor data in space and time. This work was conducted within a project that uses real data, with test conducted on 1000 sensors, during 3 years, in a large French city.

Keywords

Sensor Data Street Segment Occupancy Rate Intelligent Transportation System Fundamental Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CADDY: The CADDY Website - (2007), http://norma.mas.ecp.fr/wikimas/Caddy
  2. 2.
    Scemama, G., Carles, O.: Claire-SITI, Public road Transport Network Management Control: a Unified Approach. In: 12th IEEE Int. Conf. on Road Transport Information and Control (RTIC 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joliveau, M.: Reduction of Urban Traffic Time Series from Georeferenced Sensors, and extraction of Spatio-temporal series - in French. Ph.D thesis, Ecole Centrale Des Arts Et Manufactures (Ecole Centrale de Paris) (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jolliffe, I.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joliveau, M., Vuyst, F.D.: Space-time summarization of multisensor time series. case of missing data. In: Int. Workshop on Spatial and Spatio-temporal data mining, IEEE SSTDM (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dempster, A., Laird, N., Rubin, D.: Maximum likelihood for incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society series B 39, 1–38 (1977)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hugueney, B.: Adaptive Segmentation-Based Symbolic Representations of Time Series for Better Modeling and Lower Bounding Distance Measures. In: Proc. 10th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 542–552 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hugueney, B., Joliveau, M., Jomier, G., Manouvrier, M., Naja, Y., Scemama, G., Steffan, L.: Towards a data warehouse for urban traffic (in french). Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de L’Information RNTI (B2), 119–137 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yi, B.K., Faloutsos, C.: Fast time sequence indexing for arbitrary Lp norm. In: Proc. of the 26th VLBD Conference, pp. 385–394 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keogh, E., Chakrabarti, K., Pazzani, M., Mehrotra, S.: Dimensionality reduction for fast similarity search in large time series databases. Journal of Knowledge and Information Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mariotte, L., Medeiros, C.B., Torres, R.: Diagnosing Similarity of Oscillation Trends in Time Series. In: International Workshop on spatial and spatio-temporal data mining - SSTDM, pp. 243–248 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mautora, T., Naudin, E.: Arcs-states models for the vehicle routing problem with time windows and related problems. Computers and Operations Research 34, 1061–1084 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kriegel, H.P., Kröger, P., Kunath, P., Renz, M., Schmidt, T.: Proximity queries in large traffic networks. In: Proc. ACM GIS, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, K., Lopez, M., Leutenegger, S., Li, K.: A Network-based Indexing Method for Trajectories of Moving Objects. In: Yakhno, T., Neuhold, E.J. (eds.) ADVIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4243, pp. 344–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guting, R., Bohlen, M., Erwig, E., Jensen, C., Lorentzos, N., Schneider, M., Vazirgianis, M.: A Foundation for Representing and Querying Moving Objects. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 25(2), 1–42 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spaccapietra, S., Parent, C., Damiani, M.L., Macedo, J.A., Porto, F., Vangenot, C.: A conceptual view on trajectories. Knowledge and Data Engineering 65(1), 126–146 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Bauzer Medeiros
    • 1
  • Marc Joliveau
    • 2
  • Geneviève Jomier
    • 3
  • Florian De Vuyst
    • 2
  1. 1.ICUniversity of Campinas, UNICAMPBrazil
  2. 2.Ecole Centrale de ParisFrance
  3. 3.University Paris DauphineFrance

Personalised recommendations