Abstract
Use case models and activity diagrams play an important role in the early stages of requirements engineering for systems development. While use case descriptions represent requirements through a sequence of step descriptions in main scenario and alternate scenarios, activity diagrams are often used to connect different use cases and to represent flow of activities corresponding to steps in complex use cases. In the latter type of usage, a complex use case description and the corresponding activity diagram represent a same set of requirements using two different types of artifacts. In such situations, it is necessary to minimize inconsistencies across the models represented by these artifacts and to enhance overall quality of the resulting models. This paper reports the findings from an empirical study aimed at understanding quality dependencies between use case models and activity diagrams, and offers recommendations for developing these artifacts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agarwal, R., Sinha, A.: Object-oriented modeling with UML: a study of developers’ perceptions. Communications of the ACM 46(9), 248–256 (2003)
Ambler, S.W.: UML 2 Activity Diagramming Guidelines, vol. 2008 (2007)
Batini, C., Ceri, S., Navathe, S.B.: Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach. Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood City (1991)
Bi, H., Zhao, J.: Applying Propositional Logic to Workflow Verification. Information Technology and Management 5(3), 293–318 (2004)
Bolloju, N., Leung, F.: Assisting Novice Analysts in Developing Quality Conceptual Models with UML. Communications for the ACM 49(7) (2006)
Dobing, B., Parsons, J.: How UML is used. Communications of the ACM 49(5), 109–113 (2006)
Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: UML activity diagrams as a workflow specification language. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Ericsson, M.: Activity Diagrams: What They Are and How to Use Them, vol. 2008 (2004)
Eshuis, R.: Symbolic model checking of UML activity diagrams. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 15(1), 1–38 (2006)
Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Solvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
Mendling, J., Nüttgens, M.: EPC markup language (EPML): an XML-based interchange format for event-driven process chains (EPC). Information Systems and E-Business Management 4(3), 245–263 (2006)
Nysetvold, A., Krogstie, J.: Assessing business processing modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2005) (2005)
Rubinstein, D.: Standish Group Report: There’s Less Development Chaos Today. Software Development Times:20070301-20070301 (2007)
Siau, K., Cao, Q.: Unified Modeling Language (UML) - A Complexity Analysis. Journal of Database Management 12(1), 26–34 (2001)
Siau, K., Erickson, J., Lee, L.: Theoretical vs. Practical Complexity: The Case of UML. Journal of Database Management 16(3), 40–57 (2005)
Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling: A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363–376 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bolloju, N., Sun, S.X. (2008). Exploiting the Complementary Relationship between Use Case Models and Activity Diagrams for Developing Quality Requirements Specifications. In: Song, IY., et al. Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Challenges and Opportunities. ER 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5232. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87990-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87991-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)