Skip to main content

Entrepreneurial Motivations, Culture, and the Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship and Culture

Abstract

Inspired by Schumpeter’s seminal depiction of the entrepreneur, this chapter recasts this heroic portrait in a more rigorous theoretical framework, leveraging a model of individual value preferences by Schwartz. The entrepreneurial spirit, it is argued, consists of particular value preferences: most importantly high openness-to-change and also high self-enhancement. These hypotheses are consistent with extant empirical evidence. The upshot of this theory – especially when the stability of cultural value orientations is taken into account – is that individual propensities to engage in new venture creation may not be very susceptible to policy measures. Looking specifically at legal measures, this chapter considers measures that could be narrowly targeted to promoting entrepreneurship by making entrepreneurs even more highly motivated than what they appear to be. Recent research indicates, however, that theoretical and empirical issues, which must be resolved before such measures could be employed with confidence, are intractable at this point.

Based on the entrepreneurial spirit and what the law can do about it (first published in: Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 28 No. 4, 2007)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., Baumol et al. 2007; Carree and Thurik 2003, 2006; van Stel et al. 2005; Wong et al. 2005; Wennekers et al. 2005. On unemployment see Baptista et al. (2006).

  2. 2.

    See also Blanchflower and Oswald (1998); Blanchflower (2000); Kawaguchi (2004); Beugelsdijk and Noorderhaven (2005); van Gelderen et al. (2003); van Gelderen et al. (2006).

  3. 3.

    There is some controversy whether risk propensity is a specific combination of trait positions on the FFM or an additional, sixth, dimension of personality traits. See Zhao and Seibert (2006).

  4. 4.

    For reviews, see Wadeson (2006); Krueger (2003); Mitchell et al. (2004; 2007); see also Gaglio and Katz (2001).

  5. 5.

    Schumpeter (1934, p. 78) points out that “being an entrepreneur is not a profession and as a rule is not a lasting condition;…everyone is an entrepreneur only when he actually ‘carries out new combinations’ and loses that character as soon as he has built up his business, when he settles down to running it as other people run their business.”

  6. 6.

    For the present study, I have conducted searches in both JSTOR and Econlit databases and extensive, though obviously not comprehensive, searches of internet resources. A study that bears directly on this subject and is discussed in more detail below is Fagenson (1993).

  7. 7.

    “Other-regarding preferences” is a more accurate term than “social preferences” because the latter might mistakenly connote group preferences.

  8. 8.

    On motivated cognition, see Jost et al. (2003).

  9. 9.

    Several studies attempted linking values with entrepreneurship but they suffer from serious methodological weaknesses. For a critical survey see Bird and Brush (2003).

  10. 10.

    Schumpeter wrote the first edition of The Theory of Economic Development in 1911 and rewrote the text in 1926 for the second German edition, which appeared in English in 1934. Schumpeter (1934, p. ix).

  11. 11.

    See, e.g., Shane (2000); Saxenian (2002); Guiso and Schivardi (2005); Djankov et al. (2005, 2006); Gompers et al. (2005).

  12. 12.

    Hofstede (1980, 2001).

  13. 13.

    I assume for convenience, yet in line with the general literature, that each nation represents a single culture.

  14. 14.

    This section draws on Licht and Siegel (2006).

  15. 15.

    It is therefore clear that the scope of “property rights” in this context is broader than the usual legal meaning and includes entitlements to obligatory rights such as debt.

  16. 16.

    Another potential adversity of bankruptcy is acquiring a social stigma of failure. I abstract from this aspect here. For a short discussion and further references, see Hahn (2006).

  17. 17.

    There exists an alternative procedure to Chap. 7 liquidation in Chap. 13 of the Code. According to Berkowitz and White (2004, p. 71), “exemption levels are likely to have similar effects on credit markets regardless of the chapter that business owners would choose if they filed for bankruptcy.” Another alternative procedure exists when a debtor files for bankruptcy under Chap. 11, which provides for reorganization. The debtor usually proposes a plan of reorganization to keep the business alive and pay creditors over time. Baird and Morrison (2005) have found that the vast majority of Chap. 11 cases deal with small business entrepreneurs trying to extend the life of their business through these proceedings. Bankruptcy judges are aware of and guard against such efforts.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. H. (2005). Unbundling institutions. The Journal of Political Economy, 113, 949–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. H., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2005). Income and democracy? Department of Economics Working Paper No. 05-05. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Laszlo, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, A., & Kartik, A. (2005). Exemptions: limited enforcement encouraging entrepreneurship? Working paper. York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro, L. Charlton A (2006) International financial integration and entrepreneurship. Unpublished paper. Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. B. (2006). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Working Paper No. 2006-01-005. Fisher College of Business. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=900200

  • Amit, R., MacCrimmon, K. R., Zietsma, C., & Oesch, J. (2001). Does money matter?: Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented ventures. The Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheibani, Gde M, Maloney, D. J., & Pearson, B. (2000). And a vision appeared unto them of a great profit: Evidence of self-deception among the self-employed. Economics Letters, 67, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour, J., & Cumming, D. J. (2005). Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship. Centre for Business Research Working Paper No. 300. University of Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T. (2006). Does it pay to be a jack-of-all-trades? Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, D., & Morrison, E. (2005). Serial entrepreneurs and small business bankruptcies. Columbia Law Review, 105, 2310–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., Van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Entrepreneurship, industrial restructuring and unemployment in Portugal. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation: The dynamics of firms and industries (pp. 223–241). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How Entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking and venture formation. The Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. (2007). Sustaining entrepreneurial capitalism. Capitalism and Society, 2(2) Article 1. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/cas/vol2/iss2/art1

  • Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica, 75, 362–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz M, (2007) Entrepreneurship as a non-profit-seeking activity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, J., & White, M. J. (2004). Bankruptcy and small firms access to credit. Rand Journal of Economics, 35, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A., & Welch, I. (2001). On the evolution of overconfidence of entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., & Noorderhaven, N. (2005). Personality characteristics of self-employed; an empirical study. Small Business Economics, 24, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsky, W., & Koch, M. (2002). On the content and structure of values: Universals or methodological artefacts? In J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. deLeeuw & P. Schmidt (Eds.), Social science methodology in the New Millennium. Leverkusen: Leske and Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Measuring motivations: Integrating content and method. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. J., & Candida, G. B. (2003). What is entrepreneurial vision and how does it work? Working Paper No. 2003-19. American University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7, 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., & Jean-François, T. (2005). Public economics and start-up entrepreneurs. In V. Kanniainen & C. Keuschnigg (Eds.), Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and public policy (pp. 181–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship and development: Cause or Consequence? Advances in Austrian Economics, 6, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., & Fehr, E. (2006). When does "economic man" dominate social behavior? Science, 311, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H., Cabaña, C., Vaccine, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D. B. Audretsch & Z. J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–471). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). The handbook of entrepreneurship and economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior. A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17, 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Woo, C., & Dunkelberg, W. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. The Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Guista, M., & King, Z. (2006). Enterprise culture. In A. Basu, M. Casson, N. Wadeson & B. Yeung (Eds.), Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 629–647). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2003). Institutions, capital constraints and entrepreneurial firm dynamics: evidence from Europe. NBER Working Papers No. 10165. Cambridge, MA: NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. et al., The Impact of Regulation and Litigation on Small Business and Entrepreneurship: An Overview. Working Paper WR-317-ICJ 2006. RAND Institute for Civil Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D., Gates, S. M., Kapur, K., Seabury, S. A., & Talley, E. (2006) The impact of regulation and litigation on small business and entrepreneurship: An overview. RAND Institute for Civil Justice working paper WR-317-ICJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Miguel, E., Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2005). Who are Russia’s entrepreneurs? Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 587–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Miguel, E., Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship in China and Russia compared. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enriques, L., & Macey, J. (2001). Creditors versus capital formation: The case against the european legal capital rules. Cornell Law Review, 86, 959–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. (1993). Personal value systems of men and women entrepreneurs versus managers. The Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, W., & White, M. J. (2003). Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. The Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and co-operation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economy, 16, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M. (2004). The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Baylor University, 28, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T., & Wall, H. (2006). Creating a policy environment for entrepreneurs. Cato Journal, 26, 525–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? The Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgellis, Y. & Wall, H. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the policy environment. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, 88, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannis, G., & Hall, H. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the policy environment. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, 88, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2004). On the determinants of entrepreneurial activity: Social norms, economic environment, and individual characteristics. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11, 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial spawning. The Journal of Finance, 60, 577–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J. (1997). Parenting and the transmission and internalization of values: From social-cultural perspectives to within-family analyses. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 333–361). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., & Schivardi, F. (2005). Learning to be an entrepreneur. CEPR Discussion Paper n. 5290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, D. (2006). Velvet bankruptcy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 7, 544–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevy, Y. (2007). Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica, 75, 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. The Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A. (1998). Institutional conditions for entreprenenrship. In P. J. Boettke, I. M. Kirzner & M. J. Rizzo (Eds.), Advances in Austrian economics (Vol. 5, pp. 241–75). Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J., George, G., & Zahra, A. S. (2002). National culture and entrepreneruship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. P., & Wong, P. K. (2007). Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Economics, 28, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Noorderhaven, N. G., Wennekers, A. R. M., Uhlaner, L., Thurik, A. R., & Wildeman, R. E. (2004). Culture’s role in entrepreneurship: self-employment out of dissatisfaction. In J. Ulijn & T. Brown (Eds.), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: The interaction between technology, progress and economic growth (pp. 162–203). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (1999). Property rights, finance, and entrepreneurship. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2000). Entrepreneurs and the ordering of institutional reform: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and the Ukraine compared. Economic Transition, 8, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). Property rights and finance. American Economic Review, 92, 1335–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, R. W. Y. (1993). Defining entrepreneurship: Past, present and? Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 69–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth without governance. Economia, 3, 169–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi, D. (2004). Positive, non-earnings aspects of self-employment: Evidence from job satisfaction scores. The University of Tsukuba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerins, F., Smith, J. K., & Smith, R. (2004). Opportunity cost of capital for venture capital investors and entrepreneurs. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. The Journal of Political Economy, 87, 719–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1982). Uncertainty, discovery, and human action. In I. M. Kirzner (Ed.), Discovery and the capitalist process. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. G., & Bullock, J. B. (2006). Can entrepreneurship be taught? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 38, 429–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korunka, C., Frank, H., Lueger, M., & Mugler, J. (2003). The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process-A configurational approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. Jr. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.) Handbook of entrepreneurial research (p 105). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L. A., & Woodruff, C. M. (2007). The quality of the legal system, firm ownership, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 601–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 94, 208–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-H., Peng, M.W., & Barney, J.B. (2007). Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship development: A real options perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1293–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N. (2004). The maximands of corporate governance: A theory of values and cognitive style. The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 29, 649–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N., & Siegel, J. I. (2006). Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In M. Casson & B. Yeung (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimension of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment, firm age, and industry life cycle. The Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev, 21, 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, A. (2005). A Spatial Model of the Impact of State Bankruptcy Exemptions on Entrepreneurship. Working Paper. University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. The American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., Bygrave, W. D., & Autio, E. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2005 Executive report. Babson Park, FL: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2004). The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C. M., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E. A., et al. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, T. J., & Vissing-Jørgensen, A. (2002). The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? The American Economic Review, 92, 745–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, E., & Volpin, P. (2007). Investor protection and entry. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-006/2, Tinbergen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (2002). A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review, 46, 657–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2000). Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success: A general model and an overview of findings. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organisational psychology (pp. 101–142). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon, R., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income: Estimating the interrelationships. The Economics of Transition, 13, 533–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. (2004). Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies Comparative International Development, 38, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2475

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (2002). Local and global networks of immigrants in Silicon Valley. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Vondracek, F. W. (2002). Occupational dreams, choices, and aspirations: Adolescents’ entrepreneurial prospects and orientations. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 498–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1928). The instability of capitalism. Economic Journal, 38, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1951). Essays of J.A. Schumpeter (pp. 248–250). Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development (1912). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Translated by R. Opie, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An Internal Review, 48, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1987). The Ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. International Economic Review, 28, 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shook, C. L., Priem, R. L., & McGee, J. E. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 29, 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. I., Licht, A. N., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Egalitarianism, cultural distance, and FDI: A new approach. Unpublished paper. Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. I., Licht, A. N., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Egalitarianism and international investment. Unpublished paper. Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, O. (2006). The Jack-of-All-Trades entrepreneur: Innate talent or acquired skill? IZA discussion paper no. 2264, August, Bonn, IZA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G., & Ueda, M. (2006). Law & entrepreneurship: Do courts matter? Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, 2, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: En-trepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 686, 154–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulijn, J., & Brown, T. E. (2003). Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: A matter of interaction between technology, progress and economic growth? An introduction. In T. Brown & J. Ulijn (Eds.), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: The interaction between technology, progress and economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, M. et al. (2006). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behavior. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, M., Jansen, P., & Jonges, S. (2003). The multiple sources of autonomy as a startup motive. SCALES-paper N200315, Zoetermeer: EIM

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, C. M. (1999). Some classic views on entrepreneurship. De Economist, 147, 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, C. M., & Cramer, J. S. (2001). The roots of entrepreneurship and labor demand: Individual ability and low risk. Economica, 68, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24, 311–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stel, A.J., Storey, D.J. & Thurik, A.R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics 28, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision-making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadeson, N. S. (2006). Cognitive aspects of entrepreneurship: Decision-Making and attitudes to risk. In M. Casson, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship 511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2003). Testing Lazear’s Jack-of-all-trades view of entrepreneurship with German micro data. Applied Economics Letters, 10, 687–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, A. R. M., Thurik, A. R., van Stel, A. J., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2007). Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976–2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S. A. J., van Stel, A. R. T., & Reynolds, P. D. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. (2005). A general model of personal bankruptcy: Insurance, work. Effort, and opportunism. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Erkko, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, C. (1999). Can Any Small Firm Grow Up?: Entrepreneurship and family background in Mexico. University of California San Diego Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is based on my article The Entrepreneurial Spirit and What the Law Can Do about It. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 28: 817–861 (2007). Thanks to participants at the conference Entrepreneurship: Law, Culture, and the Labor Market for helpful comments, to Irmi Lapid for research assistance, and to Riki Vanunu for editing assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir N. Licht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Licht, A.N. (2010). Entrepreneurial Motivations, Culture, and the Law. In: Freytag, A., Thurik, R. (eds) Entrepreneurship and Culture. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87910-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics