Abstract
We investigated readers’ tendency to ignore graphs in textual contents, the effect of graphs’ visibility on recall as well as the spatial contiguity effect of texts and graphs. Eighty subjects read on a computer screen a text with graphs that depicted statistics related to the contents and were tested using a recall questionnaire. The recall performance was found to be improved for observers that examined the graphs while neither the spatial contiguity nor the graphs’ visibility affected the mnestic performance. Moreover we found that people tend to examine integrated graphs rather then graphs visualized within pop–up windows.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alesandrini, K.L.: Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 358–368 (1984)
Peeck, J.: The role of illustrations in processing and remembering illustrated text. In: Willows, D.M., Houghton, H.A. (eds.) The psychology of illustration, Basic research, vol. 1, pp. 115–151. Springer, New York (1987)
Paivio, A.: Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)
Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)
Brody, P.J.: Affecting instructional textbooks through pictures. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) The technology of text, pp. 301–316. Educational Technology Publishers, Englewood Cliffs (1982)
Schallert, D.L.: The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In: Spiro, R.J., Bruce, B.C., Brewer, W.F. (eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education, pp. 503–524. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1980)
Levie, W.H., Lentz, R.: Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 30, 195–232 (1982)
Hegarthy, M., Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A.: Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In: Barr, R., Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P.D. (eds.) Handbook of reading research. II, pp. 641–668. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1991)
Carney, R.N., Levin, J.R.: Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review 14, 5–26 (2002)
Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load Theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8, 472–517 (1991)
Weidenmann, B.: Codes of instructional pictures. In: Schnotz, W., Kulhavy, W. (eds.) Comprehension of Graphics, pp. 29–42. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1994)
Paoletti, G.: Writing-to-learn and graph drawing as aids for the integration of text and graphs. In: Rijlaarsdam, G., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M. (eds.) Studies in writing, Effective learning and teaching of writing, 2nd edn., vol. 14, pp. 587–598. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paoletti, G., Rigutti, S. (2008). Texts and Graphs Elaboration: The Effect of Graphs’ Examination on Recall. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87729-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87730-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)