Skip to main content

Natural Language Meets Spatial Calculi

  • Conference paper
Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space (Spatial Cognition 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5248))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We address the problem of relating natural language descriptions of spatial situations with spatial logical calculi, focusing on projective terms (orientations). We provide a formalism based on the theory of \(\mathcal{E}\)-connections that connects natural language and spatial calculi. Semantics of linguistic expressions are specified in a linguistically motivated ontology, the Generalized Upper Model. Spatial information is specified as qualitative spatial relationships, namely orientations from the double-cross calculus.

This linguistic-spatial connection cannot be adequately formulated without certain contextual, domain-specific aspects. We therefore extend the framework of \(\mathcal{E}\)-connections twofold: (1) external descriptions narrow down the class of intended models, and (2) context-dependencies inherent in natural language descriptions feed back into the representation finite descriptions of necessary context information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moratz, R., Dylla, F., Frommberger, L.: A Relative Orientation Algebra with Adjustable Granularity. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents in Real-Time and Dynamic Environments (IJCAI 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casati, R., Varzi, A.C.: Parts and Places - The Structures of Spatial Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn, A.G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., Gotts, N.M.: Representing and Reasoning with Qualitative Spatial Relations. In: Stock, O. (ed.) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, pp. 97–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlieder, C.: Qualitative Shape Representation. In: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, pp. 123–140. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuipers, B.: The Spatial Semantic Hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence 19, 191–233 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kracht, M.: Language and Space, Book manuscript (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bateman, J., Tenbrink, T., Farrar, S.: The Role of Conceptual and Linguistic Ontologies in Discourse. Discourse Processes 44(3), 175–213 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Freksa, C.: Using Orientation Information for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds.) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, pp. 162–178. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bateman, J.A., Henschel, R., Rinaldi, F.: Generalized Upper Model 2.0: Documentation. Technical report, GMD/Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme, Darmstadt, Germany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The Even More Irresistible \(\mathcal{SROIQ}\). In: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 57–67 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shi, H., Tenbrink, T.: Telling Rolland Where to Go: HRI Dialogues on Route Navigation. In: WoSLaD Workshop on Spatial Language and Dialogue, Delmenhorst, Germany, October 23-25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tenbrink, T.: Space, Time, and the Use of Language: An Investigation of Relationships. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levinson, S.C.: Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herskovits, A.: Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, Seeing and Acting. The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Essays in Cognitive Psychology. Psychology Press, Hove (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talmy, L.: How Language Structures Space. In: Pick, H., Acredolo, L. (eds.) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, pp. 225–282. Plenum Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halliday, M.A.K., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.: Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. Cassell, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vorwerg, C.: Raumrelationen in Wahrnehmung und Sprache: Kategorisierungsprozesse bei der Benennung visueller Richtungsrelationen. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winterboer, A., Tenbrink, T., Moratz, R.: Spatial Directionals for Robot Navigation. In: van der Zee, E., Vulchanova, M. (eds.) Motion Encoding in Language and Space. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohn, A.G., Hazarika, S.M.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning: An Overview. Fundamenta Informaticae 43, 2–32 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Renz, J., Nebel, B.: Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Constraint Calculi. In: Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I., van Benthem, J. (eds.) Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 161–215. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Renz, J., Mitra, D.: Qualitative direction calculi with arbitrary granularity. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3157, pp. 65–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dylla, F., Moratz, R.: Exploiting Qualitative Spatial Neighborhoods in the Situation Calculus. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction. International Conference Spatial Cognition 2004. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Billen, R., Clementini, E.: Projective Relations in a 3D Environment. In: Sester, M., Galton, A., Duckham, M., Kulik, L. (eds.) Geographic Information Science, pp. 18–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabbay, D., Kurucz, A., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 148. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis, D.K.: Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophy 65; repr. in The Possible and the Actual, Michael J.(ed.) Loux, Ithaca (1979); also in: David K. Lewis. (ed.) Philosophical papers 1, Oxford 1983, pp. 113–126 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kutz, O.: \(\mathcal{E}\)-Connections and Logics of Distance. PhD thesis, The University of Liverpool (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: \(\mathcal{E}\)-Connections of Abstract Description Systems. Artificial Intelligence 156(1), 1–73 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Cuenca Grau, B., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Combining OWL Ontologies Using E-Connections. Journal of Web Semantics 4(1), 40–59 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces - The Geometry of Thought. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Serafini, L., Bouquet, P.: Comparing Formal Theories of Context in AI. Artificial Intelligence 155, 41–67 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K.: The Heterogeneous Tool Set. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 519–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. CoFI: The Common Framework Initiative: Casl Reference Manual. Springer, Freely (2004), http://www.cofi.info

  34. Wölfl, S., Mossakowski, T., Schröder, L.: Qualitative Constraint Calculi: Heterogeneous Verification of Composition Tables. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2007), pp. 665–670. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kutz, O., Mossakowski, T., Codescu, M.: Shapes of Alignments: Construction, Composition, and Computation. In: International Workshop on Ontologies: Reasoning and Modularity (at ESWC) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kutz, O., Mossakowski, T.: Conservativity in Structured Ontologies. In: 18th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008). IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Codescu, M., Mossakowski, T.: Heterogeneous Colimits. In: Boulanger, F., Gaston, C., Schobbens, P.Y. (eds.) MoVaH 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Freksa Nora S. Newcombe Peter Gärdenfors Stefan Wölfl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hois, J., Kutz, O. (2008). Natural Language Meets Spatial Calculi. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds) Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space. Spatial Cognition 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87600-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87601-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics