Advertisement

Releasing the Power of Digital Metadata: Examining Large Networks of Co-related Publications

  • David Tarrant
  • Les Carr
  • Terry Payne
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5173)

Abstract

Bibliographic metadata plays a key role in scientific literature, not only to summarise and establish the facts of the publication record, but also to track citations between publications and hence to establish the impact of individual articles within the literature. Commercial secondary publishers have typically taken on the role of rekeying, mining and analysing this huge corpus of linked data, but as the primary literature has moved to the world of the digital repository, this task is now undertaken by new services such as Citeseer, Citebase or Google Scholar. As institutional and subject-based repositories proliferate and Open Access mandates increase, more of the literature will become openly available in well managed data islands containing a much greater amount of detailed bibliometric metadata in formats such as RDF. Through the use of efficient extraction and inference techniques, complex relations between data items can be established. In this paper we explain the importance of the co-relation in enabling new techniques to rate the impact of a paper or author within a large corpus of publications.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pritchard, A.: Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation 25(4), 348–349 (1969)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Egghe, L., Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Price, D.: Networks of scientific papers. Science 149, 510–515 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergstrom, C.: Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journalsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garfield, E.: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178(4060), 471–479 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleinberg, J.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 46(5), 604–632 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., Gibson, D., Kumar, S., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Tomkins, A.: Experiments in topic distillation. In: ACM SIGIR Workshop on Hypertext Information Retrieval on the Web (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Page, C., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bring order to the web, pp. 1997–2007 (manuscript, 1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer and ISDN Systems 30(1-7), 107–117 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aksnes, D., Taxt, R.: Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a norwegian university. Research Evaluation 13(1), 33–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meho, L., Sonnenwald, D.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of kurdish scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(2), 123–138 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noruzi, A.: Google scholar: the new generation of citation indexes. Libri 55(4), 170–180 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scopus empowers researchers with new citation tracker. Reed Elsevier Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giles, C., Bollacker, K., Lawrence, S.: Citeseer: an automatic citation indexing system. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries, pp. 89–98 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moed, H.: Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science 89(12), 1990–1996 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brody, T., Harnad, S.: Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(8), 1060–1072 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Small, H.: Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4), 265–269 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Tarrant
    • 1
  • Les Carr
    • 1
  • Terry Payne
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electronics and Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations