Prediction of GNSS Availability and Accuracy in Urban Environments Case Study Schiphol Airport

  • Frank Kleijer
  • Dennis Odijk
  • Edward Verbree
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Because of the increased call for positioning in urban areas, the performance of GNSS is analyzed under conditions with a decreased satellite visibility caused by buildings blocking the lines of sight. With GPS and Galileo almanacs and two city models visibility fi ngerprints of time-location combinations are computed. Outdoor availability and accuracy are predicted for both city models: Real-life data of Schiphol Airport, and an imaginary urban canyon model (located in the same area as Schiphol) with variable parameters for street width, street length and building block height. The accuracy is predicted based on dilution-of-precision values. GPS, Galileo, and a combined constellation are considered for single-frequency singleepoch positioning.

Even for mildly diffi cult urban environments 95% availability is not reached for GPS (or Galileo) close to buildings or in streets in north-south directions. In the combined GPS-Galileo constellation a substantial improvement of 30%–50% availability can be reached as compared to GPS only for those locations where GPS availability is already more than $∼$10% (under severe conditions such a high increase cannot be achieved). At Schiphol Airport, however, conditions are very mild since there are only a few enclosed areas, surrounded by more than one building block and in most vital areas 95% availability can be reached even with GPS only. The accuracy close to the buildings and piers is, on average, decreased however, up to a factor of about three very close to buildings. This effect is even larger on the south-west and south-east side of buildings because there the high satellite density in north-east and north-west directions cannot be exploited.

Keywords

Global Navigation Satellite Systems ( GNSS) line of sight (LOS) d ilution of precision (DOP) availability Schiphol Airport 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowring BR (1976) Transformation from spatial to geographical coordinates, Survey Review, 23, pp. 323–327.Google Scholar
  2. Bradbury J (2007) Prediction of urban availability and signal degradation using virtual reality city models, ION GNSS 2007, Fort Worth, Texas.Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury J, Ziebart M, Cross PA, Boulton P, Read A (2007) Code multipath modelling in the urban environment using large virtual reality city models: Determining the local environment, Journal of Navigation, 60, pp. 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (1992) GPS: Theory and practice, Springer- Verlag, Wien, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  5. Liu G, Zhang K, Densley L, Wu F, Retscher G (2006) High fi delity 3D urban model-based signal performance simulation of the current and future GNSS in Australia, IGNSS Symposium, Holiday Inn Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Min EJ de (1996) De geoïde van Nederland, PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Odijk D, Kleijer F (2007) Performance of high-sensitivity GPS for personal navigation at Schiphol Airport, the Netherlands, IGNSS Symposium, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Odijk D, Kleijer F (2008) Can GPS be used for location-based services at Schiphol Airport, the Netherlands?, Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication 2008, Hannover Germany, pp. 143–148.Google Scholar
  9. Schreutelkamp FH, Strang van Hees GL (2001) Benaderingsformules voor de transformatie tussen RD- en WGS84-coördinaten, Geodesia, pp. 64–69.Google Scholar
  10. Sleewaegen JM, Boon F (2001) Mitigating short-delay multipath: A promising new technique, ION GPS 2001, Salt lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  11. Swann J, Chatre E, Ludwig D (2003) Galileo: Benefi ts for Location Based Services, Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 1, pp. 58–66.Google Scholar
  12. Taylor G, Li J, Kidner D, Brunsdon C, Ware M (2007) Modelling and prediction of GPS availability with digital photogrammetry and LiDAR, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/13658810600816540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tiberius C, Verbree E (2004) GNSS positioning accuracy and availability within Location Based Services: The advantages of combined GPS-Galileo positioning. In: 2nd ESA/ Estec workshop on Satellite Navigation User Equipment Technologies, G.S. Granados (Ed), ESA publications division, Noordwijk, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Verbree E, Tiberius C, Vosselman G (2004) Combined GPS-Galileo positioning for location based services in urban environment, In: Proceedings of the Location Based Services & Telegraphy Symposium 2004, Austria, Vienna University of Technology, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
  15. Verhagen S (2002) Innovation Studying the performance of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: A new software tool, GPS World, 13, pp. 60–65.Google Scholar
  16. Walker JG (1984) Satellite constellations, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 37, pp. 559–571.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Kleijer
    • 1
  • Dennis Odijk
    • 2
  • Edward Verbree
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of Technology, OTB Research Institute for HousingThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Earth Observation and Space SystemsDelft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations