Advertisement

Enhancing the Experience of the Landscape: The Digital Dowsing Rod

  • Arend Ligtenberg
  • Ron van Lammeren
  • Martin Goossen
  • Jandirk Bulens
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

This research presents the Digital Dowsing Rod (DIWI1) a framework of a Location Based Service (LBS) to explore the cultural heritage of a region. The DIWI consists of a service oriented architecture (SOA), a web-client, a content management system and a mobile client based on smart phones and windows mobile technology. The chosen set-up allows for an easy management of the content and allows for a relative easy extension of the system by additional data-sources.

An extended user test of 150 testers was carried out in the “Grebbelinie” area, the Netherlands. The testers hiked and biked via different routes through that area using the application. Despite a number of technical shortcomings the DIWI was positively valued by the testers. Inspired by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) the perceived use, perceived usefulness, and perceived enjoyment were evaluated using questionnaires and detailed user logging.

Keywords

location based services web map services service oriented archi tecture cultural-historic information usability testing technology acceptance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antikainen H, Rusanen J, Vartiainen S, Myllyaho M, Karvonen J, Oivo M, Similä J, Laine K (2006) Location-based Services as a Tool For Developing Tourism in Marginal Regions. Nordia Geographical Publications, 35, 39-50.Google Scholar
  2. Baldzer J, Boll S, Klante P, Krosche J, Meyer J, Rump N, Scherp A, Appelrath HJ (2004) Location-Aware Mobile Multimedia Applications on the Niccimon Platform. Informationssysteme fur mobile Anwendungen (IMA’04), Brunswick, Germany.Google Scholar
  3. D’Roza T, Bilchev G (2003) An Overview of Location-Based Services. BT Technology Journal, 21, 20-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis FD (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dias E, Rhin C, Haller R, Scholten H (2004) Adding Value and Improving Processes Using Location-Based Services in Protected Areas: The WebPark Experience. e-Environment: Progress and Challenge Special edition on e-Environment Instituto Politécnico Nacional Mexico, Mexico City, 291-302.Google Scholar
  7. Espinoza F, Persson P, Sandin A, Nyström H, Cacciatore E, Bylund M (2001) GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information Systems. Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing.Google Scholar
  8. Goossen CM, Ploeger B (1997) Selectie van recreatievormen en indicatoren voor het Beslissingsondersteunend Evaluatiesysteem voor de Landinrichting. Wageningen, DLO-Staring Centrum.Google Scholar
  9. Goossen M, Meeuwsen H, Franke J, Kuyper M (2008) My ideal tourism destination: Personalized destination recommendation system combining individual preferences and GIS data. Journal of ITT (in print).Google Scholar
  10. Heijden Van De H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 695–704.Google Scholar
  11. Hinze A, Voisard A (2003) Location-and Time-Based Information Delivery in Tourism.Google Scholar
  12. Jose R, Davies N (1999) Scalable and Flexible Location-Based Services for Ubiquitous Information Access. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, 52-66.Google Scholar
  13. Kramer R, Modsching M, Hagen Ten K, Gretzel U (2006) Web-based Recommenders for Personalized City Tours: A Usage Analysis. Department of Computer Science. University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Germany, Laboratory for Intelligent Systems in Tourism, Texas A8M University.Google Scholar
  14. Margherita P (2004) Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 46-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayhew DJ (1999) The usability engineering lifecycle, ACM New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Raper J, Gartner G, Karimi H, Rizos C (2007) Applications of location–based services: a selected review. Journal of Location Based Services, 1, 89 - 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidt-Belz B, Laamanen H, Poslad S, Zipf A (2003) Location-based mobile tourist services-fi rst user experiences. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 115–123.Google Scholar
  18. Sharp JH (2007) Development, extension, and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Education Journal, 5, 1-11.Google Scholar
  19. Zipf A (2002) User-Adaptive Maps for Location-Based Services (LBS) for Tourism. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2002: Proceedings of the International Conference in Innsbruck, Austria, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. Zipf A, Malaka R (2001) Developing Location Based Services for Tourism-The Service Providers View. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2001. Proceedings of the International Conference in Montreal, Canada. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arend Ligtenberg
    • 1
  • Ron van Lammeren
    • 1
  • Martin Goossen
    • 2
  • Jandirk Bulens
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Geo-InformationWageningen University and Research CentreThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Landscape CentreWageningen University and Research CentreThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations