The Adoption of Mobile Location-Aware Systems for Field Police Work: Evaluation of a Pilot Initiative at the Dutch Police

  • Filippo Dal Fiore
  • Euro Beinat
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)


Mobile location aware services for police work are still in an infant phase. In this paper we present the evaluation research conducted for a Dutch police pilot initiative, to identify critical points in the adoption of new mobile and location-aware applications. The service enables officers in the fi eld to receive alerts on activities and events, locate colleagues or police cars and consult police databases. We administered questionnaires and interviewed 20 police offi cers who had gone through a 10 month testing, after having surveyed daily activities and movements in the field of an enlarged control group before the PDA was introduced. The study shows that the new applications have been unevenly used and liked among offi cers. The daily activities of neighborhood agents patrolling the streets on foot were the most impacted. The study also shows that technology factors and design choices (such as the frequency of alerts) have a strong impact on utilization. Below a certain level or usability/functionality, which appears to be completely work-process and organization specific, the intention to use the system is very low resulting in poor utilization and little behavioral impact. This paper illustrates the system, the nformation collected to assess user perception as well as behavioral work changes.


mobile LBS technology acceptance user study police field work PDA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown B, O’Hara K (2003) Place as a practical concern of mobile workers. Environment and Planning A, 35(9), 1565-1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clitheroe H, Stokols D, Zmuidzinas Z (1998) Conceptualizing the context of environment and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 103-112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davenport TH, Prusak L (1997) Information Ecology.Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dias E (2007) The added value of contextual information in natural areas. Measuring impacts of mobile environmental information. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: PhD thesis Google Scholar
  6. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald G (1998) Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Information Technology, 13 (1), 15-27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodhue D (2005) Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41, 12, 1827-1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gruhn V, Kohler A (2007) An Analysis Framework for Mobile Workforce Automation. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2007, 11th IEEE International Google Scholar
  10. Kjeldskov J, Graham C (2003) A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods. In Proceedings of the 5th International Mobile HCI 2003 conference, Udine, Italy, Springer-Verlag, LNCSGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee I, Kim J, Kim J (2005) Use contexts for the mobile Internet: a longitudinal study monitoring actual use of mobile Internet services. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 18, 269-292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filippo Dal Fiore
    • 1
  • Euro Beinat
    • 2
  1. 1.Austrian Academy of Sciences SalzburgAustria and Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and GeologySalzburg UniversityAustria

Personalised recommendations