Advertisement

Impact of Restricted Display Size on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition in the Context of Pedestrian Navigation

  • Georg Gartner
  • Wolfgang Hiller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

In this paper the infl uence of the display size on the acquisition of spatial knowledge is investigated. The acquisition of spatial knowledge based on presentation forms with different display sizes has been analysed in an empirical test for pedestrian navigation. This contribution describes and interprets the test and results and gives an outlook on the overall importance for future application developments in the context of LBS, as mobile systems typically use small displays and the overall concern exists, that these displays can not communicate any useful spatial information in typical map form to pedestrians.

Keywords

pedestrian navigation mental maps sketch maps spatial knowlege acquisition small display maps 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appleyard D (1970) Styles and methods of structuring a city. In: Environment and Behavior, 2, pp 100-117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briggs R (1973) Urban Cognitive Distance. In: Image and Environment, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, pp. 361-388Google Scholar
  3. Byrne RW (1979) Memory for urban geography, In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, pp 147-154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillemuth J et al. (2007) Choosing the scale and extent of maps for navigation with mobile computing systems. In: Journal of LBS, 1, 1, Taylor & Francis, pp 46-62Google Scholar
  5. Downs R, Stea D (1973) Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behavior: Process and Products. In: Image and Environment, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, pp 8-26Google Scholar
  6. Gartner G, Uhlirz S (2001) Cartograpic Concepts for Realizing a Location Based UMTS Service: Vienna City Guide Lol@. In: Mapping the 21st Century - The 20th International Cartographic Conference, (2001), ISBN: 7-5030-1018-5; pp 3229 - 3238Google Scholar
  7. Gartner G, Oakley K (2005) Emotional Landmarks. In: Wiener Schriften zur Geographie und Kartographie, 17, pp 115-123Google Scholar
  8. Golledge RG (1976) Methods and Methodological Issues in Environmental Cognition Research. In: Environmental Knowing, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, pp 300-313Google Scholar
  9. Helwich J (2003) Graphenbasierte Navigation eines Geometrischen Agenten: Integration von Perzeption und Instruktion. Fachbereich Informatik der Universität HamburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry D (1992) Spatial Perception in Virtual Environments: Evaluating an Architectural Application. College of Engineering, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Herrmann T, Schweizer K, Janzen G, Katz S (1998): Routen- und Überblickswissen – konzeptuelle Überlegungen. In: Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, pp 145-159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuipers BJ (1982) The ≫Map in the Head≪ Metaphor. In: Environment and Behavior, Nr. 14, pp.202-220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynch K (1960) Das Bild der Stadt. Birkhäuser VerlagGoogle Scholar
  14. Mallot H (2000) Sehen und die Verarbeitung visueller Information. Vieweg, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  15. Mallot H (2004) Kompass im Kopf, 5/2004, pp 18-27Google Scholar
  16. Neisser U (1976) Cognition and Reality. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Parush A, Ahuvia S, Erev I (2007): Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: COSIT 2007, LNCS 4736, Springer, pp 238-254Google Scholar
  18. Platzer E (2005) Spatial Cognition research: The human navigation process and its comparability in complex real and virtual environments. PhD, Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenGoogle Scholar
  19. Popp M (1998) Zeigeverhalten, Landmarken und mentale Raumpräsentationen. In: Visuelle Wahrnehmung, Beiträge zur 1. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz, Knirsch VerlagGoogle Scholar
  20. Poucet B (1993) Spatial Cognitive Maps in Animals. In: Psychological Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp 163-182Google Scholar
  21. Radoczky V (2003) Kartographische Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten zur RoutenbeschreibungGoogle Scholar
  22. von Fuβgängernavigationssystemen im In- und Outdoorbereich. MTh. TU Vienna.Google Scholar
  23. Schweizer K (1997) Räumliche oder zeitliche Wissensorganisation? Zur Repräsentation der Blickpunktsequenzen bei räumlichen Anordnungen. Pabst Science Publishers VerlagGoogle Scholar
  24. Schweizer K, Horn M (2006) Raumwahrnehmung und Raumvorstellung. In: Geographie und Schule, 164, pp 21-26Google Scholar
  25. Sorrows M, Hirtle S (1999) The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa C, Mark D (eds): Spatial Information Theory. COSIT Proceedings, Springer, pp 37-50Google Scholar
  26. Thorndyke PW, Hayes-Roth B (1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. In: Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp 560-589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tversky B (1981) Distortions in memory for maps. In: Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp. 407-433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tversky B (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Frank, A.U. and Campari, I. (Eds.) Spatial Information Theory: a Theoretical Basis for GIS. Springer, LNCS 716, Heidelberg, pp 14-24Google Scholar
  29. Whittaker JO, Whittaker (1972) A cross-cultured study of geocentrism“. In: Journal of Cross-Culture Psychology, 3, pp 417-421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Gartner
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Hiller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geoinformation and CartographyVienna University of TechnologyAustria

Personalised recommendations