Advertisement

The Module of Morphological and Syntactic Analysis SMART

  • Anastasia Leontyeva
  • Ildar Kagirov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5246)

Abstract

The present paper presents the program of morphological and syntactic analyses of the Russian language. The principles of morphological analysis are based on some ideas by A.A. Zaliznyak. The entire glossary is to be kept as sets of lexical stems and grammatical markers, such as flexions and suffixes. A great deal of stems is represented by a few variants, owing to in-stem phonological alternations. Such approach helps to reduce the glossary and retrench the time of searching a particular word-form. Syntactic analysis is based on the rules of Russian. During the processing of some texts, base syntactic groups were singled out. The module could be used as a morphology analyzer or as a syntactic analyzer. This module provides information about the initial wordform, its paradigm, its transcription and compose a vocabulary for Russian continuous speech recognizer. The module is also used for syntactic analysis of Russian sentence.

Keywords

Morphological analysis syntactic analysis word processing speech decoder 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gelbukh, A., Sidorov, G.: Approach to construction of automatic morphological analysis systems for inflective languages with little effort. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2003). LNCS, vol. 2588, pp. 215–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sokirko, A.V.: Morphological modules on the web. In: Proc. Dialog 2004, Moscow (2004), www.aot.ru
  3. 3.
    Carki, K., Geutner, P., Schultz, T.: Turkish LVCSR: Towards Better Speech Recognition for Agglutinative Languages. In: Proc. ICASSP 2000, Istanbul, Turkey (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kneissler, J., Klakow, D.: Speech recognition for huge vocabularies by using optimized subword units. In: Proc. Eurospeech 2001, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 69–72 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurimo, M., Creutz, M., Varjokallio, M., Arisoy, E., Saraclar, M.: Unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes – Morpho Challenge 2005, Application to Automatic Speech Recognition. In: Proc. Interspeech 2006, Pittsburgh, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaliznjak, A.A.: Grammatical dictionary for Russian language. Rus. jaz, Moscow (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dressler, W.U., Gagarina, N.: Basic questions in establishing the verb classes of contemporary Russian – Essays in Poetics, Literary History and Linguistics. In: Fleishman, L., Ivanov, F.V.V., et al. (eds.), OGI, Moscow, pp. 754–760 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ronzhin, A.L., Karpov, A.A.: Russian Voice Interface. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis 17(2), 321–336 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasia Leontyeva
    • 1
  • Ildar Kagirov
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of RAS SPIIRASSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations