Path-Based Access Control for Enterprise Networks

  • Matthew Burnside
  • Angelos D. Keromytis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5222)

Abstract

Enterprise networks are ubiquitious and increasingly complex. The mechanisms for defining security policies in these networks have not kept up with the advancements in networking technology. In most cases, system administrators define policies on a per-application basis, and subsequently, these policies do not interact. For example, there is no mechanism that allows a web server to communicate decisions based on its ruleset to a firewall in front of it, even though decisions being made at the web server may be relevant to decisions at the firewall. In this paper, we describe a path-based access control system for service-oriented architecture (SOA)-style networks which allows services to pass access-control-related information to neighboring services, as the services process requests from outsiders and from each other. Path-based access control defends networks against a class of attacks wherein individual services make correct access control decisions but the resulting global network behavior is incorrect. We demonstrate the system in two forms, using graph-based policies and by leveraging the KeyNote trust management system.

Keywords

Path-based access control Keynote SOA enterprise 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ioannidis, S.: Security policy consistency and distributed evaluation in heterogeneous environments. PhD thesis (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keromytis, A.D., Ioannidis, S., Greenwald, M.B., Smith, J.M.: The STRONGMAN Architecture. In: Proceedings of the 3rd DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX III), pp. 178–188 (April 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Ioannidis, J., Keromytis, A.D.: The KeyNote Trust Management System Version 2. Internet RFC 2704 (September 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Keromytis, A.: KeyNote: Trust Management for Public-Key Infrastructures. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Harbison, W.S., Roe, M. (eds.) Security Protocols 1998. LNCS, vol. 1550, pp. 59–63. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damianou, M.: A Policy Framework for Management of Distributed Systems. PhD thesis (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jajodia, S., Samarati, P., Subrahmanian, V.S.: A logical language for expressing authorizations. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 31–42 (May 1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cholvy, L., Cuppens, F.: Analyzing consistency of security policies. In: RSP: 18th IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson, M., Johnston, W., Mudumbai, S., Hoo, G., Jackson, K., Essiari, A.: Certificate-based access control for widely distributed resources. In: Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 215–228 (August 1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keromytis, A.D., Ioannidis, S., Greenwald, M.B., Smith, J.M.: Managing access control in large scale heterogeneous networks. In: Proceedings of the NATO NC3A Symposium on Interoperable Networks for Secure Communications (INSC) (November 2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Lacy, J.: Decentralized Trust Management. In: Proc. of the 17th Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 164–173. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Strauss, M.: Compliance Checking in the PolicyMaker Trust-Management System. In: Hirschfeld, R. (ed.) FC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1465, pp. 254–274. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Ioannidis, J., Keromytis, A.: The role of trust management in distributed systems security. In: Secure Internet Programming, pp. 185–210.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellison, C.: SPKI requirements. Request for Comments 2692, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellison, C., Frantz, B., Lampson, B., Rivest, R., Thomas, B., Ylonen, T.: SPKI certificate theory. Request for Comments 2693, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ellison, C.M.: SDSI/SPKI BNF. Private Email (July 1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bonatti, P., di Vimercati, S.D.C., Samarati, P.: A Modular Approach to Composing Access Policies. In: Proceedings of Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2000), pp. 164–173 (November 2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheswick, W.R., Bellovin, S.M.: Firewalls and Internet Security: Repelling the Wily Hacker. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mogul, J., Rashid, R., Accetta, M.: The Packet Filter: An Efficient Mechanism for User-level Network Code. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 39–51 (November 1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartal, Y., Mayer, A., Nissim, K., Wool, A.: Firmato: a novel firewall management toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 17–31 (May 1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayton, R., Bacon, J., Moody, K.: Access Control in an Open Distributed Environment. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (May 1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ioannidis, S., Keromytis, A.D., Bellovin, S.M., Smith, J.M.: Implementing a distributed firewall. In: 7th ACM International Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. 190–199 (November 2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ioannidis, S., Bellovin, S.M., Ioannidis, J., Keromytis, A.D., Anagnostakis, K.G., Smith, J.M.: Virtual private services: Coordinated policy enforcement for distributed applications. International Journal of Network Security (IJNS) 4(1), 69–80 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunlap, G.W., King, S.T., Cinar, S., Basrai, M.A., Chen, P.M.: Revirt: enabling intrusion analysis through virtual-machine logging and replay. In: OSDI 2002: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 211–224. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Burnside
    • 1
  • Angelos D. Keromytis
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentColumbia University 

Personalised recommendations