Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 49))

Abstract

Virtual screening (VS) experiments yield huge numbers of configurations (conformations plus rotations plus translations). In order to extract important structural information from such a complex database, new chemoinformatic tools are urgently needed. We have clustered and classified by means of “ad hoc” semiautomatic chemoinformatic tools the poses arising from docking experiments conducted on more than 700,000 compounds on tubulin. The results obtained in this way have been compared with those achieved by visual inspection protocols in an attempt to develop new useful tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgers Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lauss, M., Kriegner, A., Vierlinger, K., Noebammer, C.: Characterization of the drugged human genome. Pharmacogenomics 8, 1063–1073 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Overington, J.P., Al-Lazikani, B., Hopkins, A.L.: Opinion - How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 5, 993–996 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paolini, G.V., Shapland, R.H.B., van Hoorn, W.P., Mason, J.S., Hopkins, A.L.: Global mapping of pharmacological space. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 805–815 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubinyi, H.: Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. Drug research: myths, hype and reality 2, 665–669 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ojima, I.: Modern Molecular Approaches to Drug Design and Discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 2–3 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baxendale, I.R., Hayward, J.J., Ley, S.V., Tranmer, G.K.: Pharmaceutical Strategy and Innovation: An Academics Perspective. Chem. Med. Chem. 2, 268–288 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ling, X.F.B.: High throughput screening informatics. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 11, 249–257 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson, T.J., Fisher, M.B.: Recent advances in high throughput screening for ADME properties. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 11, 258–264 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diller, D.J.: The synergy between combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 11, 346–355 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Soichet, B.K.: Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432, 862–865 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leach, A.R., Shoichet, B.K., Peishoff, C.E.: Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps. J. Med. Chem. 49, 5851–5855 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren, G.L., Andrews, C.W., Capelli, A.-M., Clarke, B., LaLonde, J., Lambert, M.H., Lindvall, M., Nevins, N., Semus, S.F., Senger, S., Tedesco, G., Wall, I.D., Woolven, J.M., Peishoff, C.E., Head, M.S.: A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions. J. Med. Chem. 49, 5912–5931 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson, H.A., McCammon, J.A.: Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol. Pharm. 57, 213–218 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sotriffer, C.A., Dramburg, I.: In Situ Cross-Docking To Simultaneously Address Multiple Targets. J. Med. Chem. 48, 3122–3123 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan, M.A., Wilson, L.: Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 253–265 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ravelli, R.B., Gigant, B., Curmi, P.A., Jourdain, I., Lachkar, S., Sobel, A., Knossow, M.: Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature 428, 198–202 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvarez, C., Alvarez, R., Corchete, P., Pérez-Melero, C., Pelaez, R.: Medarde. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.04.054

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pelaez, R., López, J.L., Medarde, M.: Application of chemoinformatic tools for the analysis of virtual screening studies of tubulin inhibitors. In: Corchado, E., Corchado, J.M., Abraham, A. (eds.) Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 44, pp. 411–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carr, R.A.E., Congreve, M., Murray, C.W., Rees, D.C.: Fragment-based lead discovery: leads by design. Drug Disc Dev. 14, 987–992 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Irwin, J.J., Shoichet, B.K.: ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model 45, 177–182 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jain, A.N.: Surflex: Fully Automatic Flexible Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine. J. Med. Chem. 46, 499–511 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Visualization of the superposed complexes was done with Jmol: http://www.jmol.org and with MarvinBeans 4.1.2 ChemAxon (2006), http://www.chemaxon.com

  24. http://www.accelrys.com/

  25. Kochev, N., Monev, V., Bangov, I.: Searching Chemical Structures. In: Chemoinformatics: A textbook, pp. 291–318. Wiley-VCH, Chichester (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohamadi, F., Richards, N.G.J., Guida, W.C., Liskamp, R., Lipton, M., Caufield, C., Chang, G., Hendrickson, T., Still, W.C.: MacroModel an Integrated Software System for Modeling Organic and Bioorganic Molecules Using Molecular Mechanics. J. Comp. Chem. 11, 440–467 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hart, D.R., Stark, P.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K., Olson, A.J.: Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comp. Chem. 19, 1639–1662 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. López-Perez, J.L., Therón, R., del Olmo, E., Díaz, D.: NAPROC-13: a database for the dereplication of natural product mixtures in bioassay-guided protocols. Bioinformatics 23, 3256–3257 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Juan M. Corchado Juan F. De Paz Miguel P. Rocha Florentino Fernández Riverola

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peláez, R., Therón, R., García, C.A., López, J.L., Medarde, M. (2009). Design of New Chemoinformatic Tools for the Analysis of Virtual Screening Studies: Application to Tubulin Inhibitors. In: Corchado, J.M., De Paz, J.F., Rocha, M.P., Fernández Riverola, F. (eds) 2nd International Workshop on Practical Applications of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (IWPACBB 2008). Advances in Soft Computing, vol 49. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85861-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85861-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85860-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85861-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics