Skip to main content

Multiobjective (Combinatorial) Optimisation—Some Thoughts on Applications

  • Conference paper
Book cover Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 618))

Abstract

In recent years there have been considerable advances in methodology (exact and heuristic algorithms) to solve multiobjective optimization problems. Combined with the rapid improvement in computing technology, this means that large scale multiobjective optimization problems arising in real world applications have become tractable.

In this paper, I outline some application areas and illustrate how the application of multiple objective methods provide secondary benefits such as additional insight in the application area and improved processes. These benefits are in addition to the primary benefits of more realistic modelling and better decision support by including the conflicting goals that decision makers usually face.

However, the study of real world applications also motivates research on the mathematical aspects of multiobjective optimization. I illustrate this win—win situation using examples drawn from finance (portfolio optimization), transportation (train timetabling, airline crew scheduling), medicine (radiotherapy treatment planning), and telecommunication (routing in networks).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benson H (1998) An outer approximation algorithm for generating all efficient extreme points in the outcome set of a multiple objective linear programming problem. J Global Optim 13(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Butchers E, Day P, Goldie A, Miller S, Meyer J, Ryan D, Scott A, Wallace C (2001) Optimised crew scheduling at Air New Zealand. Interfaces 31(1):30–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang T, Meade N, Beasley J, Sharaiha Y (2000) Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Comput Oper Res 27:1271–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotrutz C, Lahanas M, Kappas C, Baltas D (2001) A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithm for external beam conformal radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 46:2161–2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrgott M, Ryan D (2002) Constructing robust crew schedules with bicriteria optimization. J Multicrit Decision Anal 11:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrgott M, Ryan D (2003) The method of elastic constraints for multiobjective combinatorial optimization and its application in airline crew scheduling. In: Tanino T, Tanaka T, Inuiguchi M (eds) Multi-objective programming and goal-programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrgott M, Klamroth K, Schwehm C (2004) An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 155:752–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, vol 78 of Springer's International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer Science and Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gandibleux X, Beugnies F, Randriamasy S (2006) Martins' algorithm revisited for multiob-jective shortest path problems with a maxmin cost function. 4OR 4:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen P (1979) Bicriterion path problems. In: Fandel G, Gal T (eds) Multiple Criteria decision making theory and application, vol 177 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 109–127

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holder A (2003) Designing radiotherapy plans with elastic constraints and interior point methods. Health Care Manage Sci 6:5–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Konno H (1990) Piecewise linear risk function and portfolio optimization. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 33:139–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Küfer K-H, Hamacher H (2000) A multicriteria optimization approach for inverse radiotherapy planning. In: Schlegel W, Bortfeld T (eds) XIIIth International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. Springer, Berlin, pp 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lahanas M, Schreibmann E, Baltas D (2003) Multiobjective inverse planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy with constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms. Phys Med Biol 48:2843–2871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martins E (1984) On a multicriteria shortest path problem. Eur J Oper Res 16:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller-Hannemann M, Weihe K (2006) On the cardinality of the Pareto set in bicriteria shortest path problems. Ann Oper Res 147:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raith A, Ehrgott M (2008) A comparison of solution strategies for biobjective shortest path problems. Computers & Operations Research doi 10.1016/j.cor.2008.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  20. Romeijn H, Dempsey J, Li J (2004) A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models. Phys Med Biol 49:1991–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao L, Ehrgott M (2008) Approximately solving multiobjective linear programmes in objective space and an application in radiotherapy treatment planning. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 68:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steuer R, Qi Y, Hirschberger M (2007) Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Ann Oper Res 152:297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tam B (2004) Multi-criteria methods for unit crewing in the airline tour-of-duty planning problem. In: Ehrgott M (ed) Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of New Zealand. pp 174–183 Available online at http://www.orsnz.org. nz/conf39/Papers/TamB.pdf.

  24. Weide O, Ryan D, Ehrgott M (2007) Iterative airline scheduling. Technical Report 645, Department of Engineering Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yen J, Birge J (2006) A stochastic programming approach to the airline crew scheduling problem. Transport Sci 40(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ehrgott, M. (2009). Multiobjective (Combinatorial) Optimisation—Some Thoughts on Applications. In: Barichard, V., Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X., T'Kindt, V. (eds) Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85646-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics