Skip to main content

Multiple-Objective Genetic Algorithm Using the Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method TOPSIS

  • Conference paper
Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 618))

Abstract

The so called second generation of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) like NSGA-II, are highly efficient and obtain Pareto optimal fronts characterized mainly by a wider spread and visually distributed fronts. The subjacent idea is to provide the decision-makers (DM) with the most representative set of alternatives in terms of objective values, reserving the articulation of preferences to an a posteriori stage. Nevertheless, in many real discrete problems the number of solutions that belong the Pareto front is unknown and if the specified size of the non-dominated population in the MOEA is less than the number of solutions of the problem, the found front will be incomplete for a posteriori Making Decision. A possible strategy to overcome this difficulty is to promote those solutions placed in the region of interest while neglecting the others during the search, according to some DM's preferences. We propose TOPSISGA, that merges the second generation of MOEAs (we use NSGA-II) with the well known multiple criteria decision making technique TOPSIS whose main principle is to identify as preferred solutions those ones with the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution. The method induces an ordered list of alternatives in accordance to the DM's preferences based on Similarity to the ideal point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cvetkovic D, Coello C (2005) Human preferences and their applications in evolutionary multi- objective optimization. In: Yaochu J (ed) Knowledge incorporation in evolutionary computation (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 167). Springer, Berlin, pp 479–502

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb K, Pratap A, Agrawal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb K, Sundar J, Udaya Bhaskara Rao N, Chaudhuri S (2006) Reference Point based multi- objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Int J Comput Intell Res 2(3):273–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galván B (1999) Contributions to fault tree quantitative evaluation. Dissertation, Physics Department, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University, Canary Islands, Spain, (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greiner D, Galván B, Winter G (2003) Safety systems optimum design by multicriteria evolutionary algorithms. In: Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, LNCS 2632. Springer, Berlin, pp 722–736

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ishibuchi H, Narukawa K (2004) Performance evaluation of simple multiobjective genetic local search algorithms on multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problems. Proc. 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC'2004), IEEE Service Center, vol. 1, pp 441–448

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaszkiewicz A (2002) On the Performance of Multiple Objective Genetic Local Search on the 0/1 Knapsack Problem. A comparative experiment. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(4):402–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwangsun Yoon (1987) A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. J Oper Res Soc 38(3):277–286

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput J 8(2):125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Méndez, M., Galván, B., Salazar, D., Greiner, D. (2009). Multiple-Objective Genetic Algorithm Using the Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method TOPSIS. In: Barichard, V., Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X., T'Kindt, V. (eds) Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85646-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics