Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources

  • João Alberto de Oliveira Lima
  • Monica Palmirani
  • Fabio Vitali
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4884)

Abstract

The paper presents an application of the FRBROO document model for defining an information ontology of legal resources that takes into account the dimension of time. FRBR-based paradigms are used within several existing projects in computer support of activities in the legal domain, but they are mostly oriented to bibliographic organization of documents without a real modeling of the peculiar characteristics of the legal domain. Also, all of them refer to the current version of the FRBR model, called FRBRER. Yet, in these years the FRBR model is undergoing a major revision and a new version using an object-oriented approach is being developed. Thus we first have updated the model of legal resources to rely on the new object-oriented model, called FRBROO. More importantly, consistency problems were corrected and the time dimension was introduced, which came very useful when considering the legal domain and dealing with legal resources. Therefore, while it is not in the scope of this paper to define an abstract model of the norms (e.g. obligations, permissions, etc.) or the representation of the norms (e.g. rules model), we rather focus our attention on the abstract description of the normative acts lifecycle and how it is possible to fill the gap between the rule modeling and the structure of the legal resources.

Keywords

URI FRBR Ontology temporal model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    VV., A.: Studio di fattibilità per la realizzazione del progetto Accesso alle norme in rete. Informatica e Diritto, 1 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breuker, J., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Sartor, G., Rubino, R., Palmirani, M., Gordon, T.F., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T.: Deliverable 1.4 of the European Project ESTRELLA - OWL Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts (LKIF-Core). Technical report, University of Amsterdam, Bologna, Liverpool and Fraunhofer FOKUS (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlyle, A.: Ordering author and work records: An evaluation of collocation in online catalog displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, 538–554 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagoze, C.: Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 4(1) (2003-04-09), http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v04/i01/Doerr/doerr-final.pdf
  5. 5.
    Doerr, M., Le Boeuf, P.: International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (version 0.8.1) (2007), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo/frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.8.1c.pdf
  6. 6.
    Fitch, K.: Aleg Data Model. Inventory. AustLit Gateway, http://www.austlit.edu.au:7777/DataModel/inventory.html
  7. 7.
    Guarino, N.: The role of Identity Conditions in Ontology Design. In: Workshop on Ontology and Problem Solving Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heaney, M.: Time is of the essence: some thoughts occasioned by the papers contributed to the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR. Oxford: Bodleian Library (1997), http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/users/mh/time978a.htm
  9. 9.
    ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group; CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model: version 4.0, April 2004. Heraklion, Greece (2004), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/cidoc_crm_version_4.0.pdf
  10. 10.
    IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. K. G. Saur, Munich, Germany (1998), http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
  11. 11.
    Lima, J.A.O.: An Adaptation of the FRBR Model to Legal Norms. In: Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Sartor, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, 2006. European Press Academic Publishing, Italia (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lagoze, C.: Business unusual: how “event-awareness” may breathe life into the catalog? In: Conference on bibliographic control in the new millennium. Washington: Library of Congress, http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/lagoze_paper.html
  13. 13.
    Leazer, G., Furner, J.: Topological indices of textual identity networks. In: Woods, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, pp. 345–358. Information Today, Medford (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., OltamariI, A.: Ontology library. IST-2001-33052 Deliverable 18, WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmirani, M.: Dynamics of Norms over Time: a Model for Legislative Consolidation. I Quaderni 18, 42–69 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palmirani, M.: Modificatory Provisions for Legislative Consolidation, UNDESA Report (2006), http://www.akomantoso.org/resources/modificatory-provisions-for-legislative
  17. 17.
    Palmirani, M., Sartor, G., Rubino, R., Boer, A., De Maat, E., Vitali, F., Francesconi, E.: Guidelines for applying the new format. Deliverable 3.2, Estrella project, - Guidelines for applying the new format. Technical report, University of Bologna, Amsterdam, CNIPA (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    PREMIS, Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf
  19. 19.
    Smiraglia, R.P., Leazer, G.H.: Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society and Information Science 50, 493–504 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of ‘A Work’: An introduction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 33 (3/4), 1–11 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smiraglia, R.P.: The History of “The Work” in the Modern Catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 35(3/4), 553–567 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Svenonius, E.: The intellectual foundation of information organization. Digital libraries and electronic publishing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters, W., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D.: The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15(2) (June 2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vitali, F.: Akoma Ntoso Release Notes (2007), http://www.akomantoso.org
  25. 25.
    Yee, M.: What is a work? Part 3: The Anglo-American cataloging codes. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 20(1), 25–46 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Alberto de Oliveira Lima
    • 1
  • Monica Palmirani
    • 2
  • Fabio Vitali
    • 3
  1. 1.Senate of BrazilBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.CIRSFID - University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations