Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 2202 Accesses

Key Points

This chapter gives an overview of small bowel motility imaging. A short summarization on the physiology of small bowel peristalsis is followed by the different techniques currently used to monitor small bowel function such as manometry and scin-tigraphy. Until now, no technology has been available that is able to visualize bowel motility. For MRI, the techniques to acquire motility images are described as well as the analysis of motility and the interpretation of the data. Some clinical applications of small bowel motility changes are demonstrated to indicate the possibilities of monitoring bowel function with MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antes G and Lissner J (1983). Double-contrast small-bowel examination with barium and methylcellulose. Radiology 148(1): 37–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Argenyi EE, Soffer EE, Madsen MT, et al. (1995). Scintigraphic evaluation of small bowel transit in healthy subjects: inter- and intrasubject variability. Am J Gastroenterol 90(6): 938–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JL, Hasler WL and Camilleri M (1999). American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 116(3): 732–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassotti G, de Roberto G, Castellani D, et al. (2005). Normal aspects of colorectal motility and abnormalities in slow transit constipation. World J Gastroenterol 11(18): 2691–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behm B and Stollman N (2003). Postoperative ileus: etiologies and interventions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(2): 71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, di Lorenzo C, et al. (2008). American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20(12): 1269–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debatin JF and Patak MA (1999). MRI of the small and large bowel. Eur Radiol 9(8): 1523–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deetjen P, Speckmann EJ and Heschler J (2006). Physiologie. München, Urban&Schwarzberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell'Aquila P, Pietrini L, Barone M, et al. (2005). Small intestinal contrast ultrasonography-based scoring system: a promising approach for the diagnosis and follow-up of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 39(7): 591–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich JM, Daenzer M, von Weymarn C, et al. (2009). Aperistaltic effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide versus glu-cagon on the small bowel assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 19(6): 1387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, et al. (2005). Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 21(4): 370–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasbarrini A, Lauritano EC, Garcovich M, et al. (2008). New insights into the pathophysiology of IBS: intestinal micro-flora, gas production and gut motility. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 12 Suppl 1: 111–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gimondo P and Mirk P (1997). A new method for evaluating small intestinal motility using duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(1): 187–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. (2006). Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional entero-clysis. Eur Radiol 16(9): 1915–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gryback P, Blomquist L, Schnell PO, et al. (2002). [Scintigraphic assessment of the small intestine transit. Diagnostic investigation of dysmotility with 99mTc-HIDA]. Lakartidningen 99(14): 1556–8, 1561–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Husebye E (1999). The patterns of small bowel motility: physiology and implications in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 11(3): 141–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MP and Bratten JR (2008). Small intestinal motility. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 24(2): 164–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, et al. (2003). Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 228(1): 279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. (2006). MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238(2): 517–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen JL, Graff J and Fugisang S (2000). A simplified method for processing dynamic images of gastric antrum. Nucl Med Commun 21(11): 1037–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, et al. (1987). Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 163(2): 297–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malagelada JR and Stanghellini V (1985). Manometric evaluation of functional upper gut symptoms. Gastroenterology 88(5 Pt 1): 1223–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxion-Bergemann S, Thielecke F, Abel F, et al. (2006). Costs of irritable bowel syndrome in the UK and US. Pharmacoeconomics 24(1): 21–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan BP (1996). Gastric Emptying, Small Bowel Transit, and Colonic Transit Studies. The Mayo Clinic Manual Of Nuclear Medicine. M. K. O'Connor. Rochester, Churchill Livingstone: 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandolfino JE and Kahrilas PJ (2005). AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 128(1): 209–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, et al. (2007a). Non-invasive measurement of small-bowel motility by MRI after abdominal surgery. Gut 56(7): 1023–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, et al. (2001). Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 358(9286): 987–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patak MA, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, et al. (2007b). Improved diagnosis of Crohn's disease by peristaltic motion assessment: a comparison of standardized MRE with and without cine TrueFISP sequence. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), 18th Annual Meeting and postgraduate Course, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch S, Krueger K, Turan A, et al. (2009). Determining small intestinal transit time and pathomorphology in critically ill patients using video capsule technology. Intensive Care Med 35(6): 1054–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, et al. (2000). Hydro-MRI in Crohn's disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35(7): 431–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwizer W, Fraser R, Maecke H, et al. (1994). Gd-DOTA as a gastrointestinal contrast agent for gastric emptying measurements with MRI. Magn Reson Med 31(4): 388–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sellink JL and Rosenbusch G (1981). [“The ten commandments” for enteroclysis or ten golden rules for proper enteroclysis technique (author's transl)]. Radiologe 21(8): 366–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soybel DI (1994). Applications of electrophysiology in studies of ion transport by gut mucosa. J Surg Res 57(4): 510–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller RC, Brown ML and Phillips SF (1987). Emptying of the terminal ileum in intact humans. Influence of meal residue and ileal motility. Gastroenterology 92(3): 724–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AB, Drozdowski L, Iordache C, et al. (2003a). Small bowel review: Normal physiology, part 1. Dig Dis Sci 48(8): 1546–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AB, Drozdowski L, Iordache C, et al. (2003b). Small bowel review: Normal physiology, part 2. Dig Dis Sci 48(8): 1565–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziessman HA (1992). Scintigraphy in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Radiol 4(3): 105–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Barbara LeBlanc and Susanne Furrer for their great work in producing and editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patak, M.A., Weymarn, C.v., Wentz, KU., Tutuja, R., Wissmeyer, M., Froelich, J.M. (2010). MRI of Bowel Motility. In: Stoker, J. (eds) MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85531-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85532-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics