Skip to main content

We investigate reasonably large partial tilting or cotilting modules, obtained after the cancellation of suitable direct summands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. W. Anderson and K. R. Fuller, Rings and categories of modules, GTM 13, Springer, Berlin, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Angeleri —Hügel, D. Happel and H. Krause, Handbook of Tilting Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 332, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Angeleri Hügel, A. Tonolo and J.Trlifaj, Tilting preenvelopes and cotilting precovers, Algebra and Representation Theory 4 (2001), 155–170

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Auslander, I. Reiten and S. O. Smalø, Representation theory of artin algebras, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Bazzoni, A characterization of n-cotilting and n-tilting modules, J. Algebra 273 (2004), 359–372

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Brenner and M. C. R. Butler, Generalizations of the Bernstein —Gelfand —Ponomarev reflection functors, Representation Theory II (Ottawa, 1979), V.Dlab and P. Gabriel (eds.), Lectur Notes in Mathematics, vol. 832, Springer, Berlin, 1980, 103–169

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. R. Colby and K. R. Fuller, Equivalence and Duality for Module Categories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Colpi, Tilting modules and *-modules, Comm. Algebra 21(4) (1993), 1095–1102

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Colpi, G. D'Este and A. Tonolo, Quasi tilting modules and counter equivalences, J. Algebra 191 (1997), 461–494

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Colpi, G. D'Este and A. Tonolo, Corrigendum, J. Algebra 206 (1998), 370–370

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. D'Este, On tilting and cotilting-type modules, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 46(2) (2005), 281–291

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G. D'Este, On large selforthogonal modules, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 47(4) (2006), 549–560

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Happel, I. Reiten and S. O. Smalø, Tilting in abelian categories and quasitilted algebras, Memoirs in AMS, vol. 575 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Mantese, Complements of projective almost complete tilting modules, Comm. Algebra 33(4) (2005), 2921–2940

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. C. M. Ringel, Tame algebras and integral quadratic forms, Springer LMN 1099 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. M. Ringel, Algebra at the Turn of the Century, South East Asian Bull. of Math. 25 (2001), 147–160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. C. M. Ringel, Combinatorial Representation Theory: History and Future, Representations of Algebras, Vol. 1 (ed. D. Happel and Y. B. Zhang) BNU Press, Beijing, 2002, 122–144

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. M. Ringel, Some Remarks Concerning Tilting Modules and Tilting Algebras. Origin. Relevance. Future. An appendix to the Handbook of Tilting Theory, London Math. Soc., Cambridge University Press, vol. 332 (2007), 413–472

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Rickard, Morita theory for derived categories, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 39 (1989), 436–456

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Schaps and E. Zakay-Illouz, Combinatorial partial tilting complexes for the Brauer star algebras, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 224, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Trlifaj, Infinite dimensional tilting modules and cotorsion pairs, Handbook of Tilting Theory, London Math. Soc., Cambridge University Press, vol. 332 (2007), 279–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. D'Este .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D'Este, G. (2009). Comparing Small Orthogonal Classes. In: Silvestrov, S., Paal, E., Abramov, V., Stolin, A. (eds) Generalized Lie Theory in Mathematics, Physics and Beyond. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85332-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics