Skip to main content

Dual Growing Rods

  • Chapter
The Growing Spine

Abstract

Surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) is one of the most difficult challenges in modern pediatric spine surgery. This arises from the fact that young children with progressive spine deformity can have life-threatening cardiopulmonary complications and face severe consequences if left untreated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O et al (2005) Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive earlyonset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine 30(17 suppl):S46–S57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion;the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine 33(9):984–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akbarnia BA, Mundis G, Salari P et al (2009) Innovation in Growing Rod technique; Study of safety and efficacy of Remotely Expandable Rod in animal model. J Child Orthop 3(6):503–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akbarnia BA, Oliveira D, Salari P et al (2009) Neurological complication after growing rod implants exchange: a case report. J Child Orthop 3:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH et al (2010) Complications in growing rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: Analysis of 897 surgeries. J Bone Joint Surg Am: In Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blakemore LC, Scoles PV, Poe-Kochert C et al (2001) Submuscular Isola rod with or without limited apical fusion in the management of severe spinal deformities in young children: preliminary report. Spine 26(18):2044–2048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimeglio A (1993) Growth of the spine before age 5 years. J Pediatr Orthop 1-B:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger H (1989) The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop 9(5):541–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrington PR (1962) Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44-A:591–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klemme WR, Denis F, Winter RB et al (1997) Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):734–742

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luque E, Cardosa A (1977) Segmental spinal instrumentation in growing children. Orthop Trans 1:37

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luque ER (1982) Paralytic scoliosis in growing children. Clin Orthop (163):202–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahar A, Bagheri R et al (2007) Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique. Spine J 8(6):933–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchetti PG, Faldini A (1978) “End fusions” in the treatment of some progressive scoliosis in childhood or early adolescence. Orthop Trans 2:271

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mardjetko SM, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP et al (1992) The Luque trolley revisited. Review of nine cases requiring revision. Spine 17(5):582–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta MH (1972) The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54(2):230–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mineiro J, Weinstein SL (2002) Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: early results. J Pediatr Orthop 22(3):290–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moe J, Cummine J, Winter R et al (1978) Harrington instrumentation without fusion combined with the milwaukee brace for difficult scoliosis problems in young children. Scoliosis Research Society, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moe JH, Kharrat K, Winter RB et al (1984) Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children. Clin Orthop (185):35–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell RG et al (1999) Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(15):1538–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salari P, Oliveira D, Akbarnia BA et al (2009) Infantile idiopathic scoliosis; variations in preferred treatment options. In: The 16th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST) Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sanders JO, Herring JA, Browne RH (1995) Posterior arthrodesis and instrumentation in the immature (Risser-grade-0) spine in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(1):39–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sankar WN, Skaggs DL, Emans JB et al (2009) Neurologic risk in growing rod spine surgery in early onset scoliosis: is neuromonitoring necessary for all cases. Spine 34(18):1952–1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Skaggs DL (2008) Terminology for early onset scoliosis and chest wall deformities.In: The Second International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis & Growing Spine (ICEOS), Montreal, Quebec

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sponseller PD, Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA et al (2009) Growing rods for infantile scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 34(16):1711–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sponseller PD, Yang JS, Thompson GH et al (2009) Pelvic fixation of growing rods; comparison of constructs. Spine 34(16):1706–1710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tello C (1994) Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities. Experience and technical details. Orthop Clin North Am 25(2):333–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Kostial P et al (2005) Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study. Spine 30(18):2039–2044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vitale MG, Matsumoto H et al (2008) Health-related quality of life in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 28(2):239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Winter R (1997) Scoliosis and spinal growth. Orthop Rev 6:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yazici M, Asher M et al (2000) The safety and efficacy of Isola-Galveston instrumentation and arthrodesis in the treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(4):524–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behrooz A. Akbarnia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akbarnia, B.A., Mundis, G.M., Salari, P. (2011). Dual Growing Rods. In: Akbarnia, B.A., Yazici, M., Thompson, G.H. (eds) The Growing Spine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85207-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85207-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85206-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85207-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics