Abstract
The topic I want to address is the role that accessibility evaluation methods can play in helping the transition from accessibility viewed as standard conformance, to a user-centered accessibility. As we will see, this change sets additional requirements on how evaluations of websites should be carried out.
This paper first discusses different problems that occur while dealing with accessibility. We will see that different people have radically different views of accessibility and how it should be assessed.
The first requirement is a clear definition of what accessibility is and how it should be assessed. The accessibility model discussed in Section 2.1 has precisely this role.
Several existing evaluation methods are then reviewed and discussed, a simple taxonomy is presented, and differences that occur when evaluating accessibility rather than usability are pinpointed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brajnik, G.: Modeling content and expression of learning objects in multimodal learning management systems. In: HCI International 2007, FUITEL: Future Interfaces in Technology Enhanced Learning, Beijing, China (July 2007)
Brajnik, G.: Measuring web accessibility by estimating severity of barriers. In: 2nd International Workshop on Web Usability and Accessibility IWWUA 2008, Auckland, New Zealand (September 2008)
Brajnik, G.: Web Accessibility Testing: When the Method is the Culprit. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 156–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Brajnik, G.: Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Int. Journal on Universal Access in the Information Society 3(3-4), 252–263 (2004)
Brajnik, G.: Web accessibility testing with barriers walkthrough (March 2006) (Visited May 2008), http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio/projects/bw
Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R.: SAMBA: a semi-automatic method for measuring barriers of accessibility. In: Trewin, S., Pontelli, E. (eds.) 9th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS, Tempe, AZ. ACM Press, New York (2007)
Brajnik, G., Toppano, E.: Creare siti web multimediali: fondamenti di analisi e progettazione, Italy. Addison-Wesley/Pearson Education (2007)
Brajnik, G., Mulas, A., Pitton, C.: Effects of sampling methods on web accessibility evaluations. In: Trewin, S., Pontelli, E. (eds.) 9th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS, Tempe, AZ. ACM Press, New York (2007)
Buillon, L., Vanderdonckt, J.: Retargeting web pages on other computing platforms with vaquita. In: van Deursen, Burd, A. (eds.) Proc. of IEEE Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering WCRE 2002, Richmond, October 2002, pp. 339–348. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)
College of Design, North Carolina University. Principles of Universal Design. The Center for Universal Design (Febuary 1997) (Visited May 2008), http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprincipleshtmlformat.html
Coyne, K.P., Nielsen, J.: How to conduct usability evaluations for accessibility: methodology guidelines for testing websites and intranets with users who use assistive technology. Nielsen Norman Group (October 2001), http://www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/testing
Dey, A.: Accessibility evaluation practices - survey results (2004) (Visited May 2008), http://deyalexander.com/publications/accessibility-evaluation-practices.html
DRC. Formal investigation report: web accessibility. Disability Rights Commission (April 2004) (Visited January 2006), www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/report.asp
Gray, W.D., Salzman, M.C.: Damaged merchandise: a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human–Computer Interaction 13(3), 203–261 (1998)
Hartson, H.R., Andre, T.S., Williges, R.C.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 15(1), 145–181 (2003)
Henry, S.L., Grossnickle, M.: Just Ask: Accessibility in the User-Centered Design Process. Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, On-line book (2004), http://www.UIAccess.com/AccessUCD
Hertzum, M., Jacobsen, N.E.: The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1(4), 421–443 (2001)
ISO. Ergonomics of human–system interaction — guidance on accessibility for human–computer interfaces. ISO/TS 16071. Technical report, International Standards Organization (2003), www.iso.ch
Italian Government. Requisiti tecnici e i diversi livelli per l’accessibilità agli strumenti informatici (July 2005) (G. U. n. 183 8/8/2005), www.pubbliaccesso.it/normative/DM080705.htm
Italian Parliament. Disposizioni per favorire l’accesso dei soggetti disabili agli strumenti informatici (January 2004) (Law n. 4, January 9 2004), http://www.parlamento.it/parlam/leggi/04004l.htm
Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Phipps, L., Petrie, H., Hamilton, F.: Forcing standardization or accomodating diversity? A framework for applying the WCAG in the real world. In: Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., Goble, C. (eds.) W4A 2005: Proc. of the 2005 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility, Chiba, Japan, April 2005, pp. 46–54. ACM, New York (2005)
Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Brown, S., Seale, J., Petrie, H., Lauke, P., Ball, S.: Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes. In: W4A 2007: Proc. of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pp. 138–147. ACM, New York (2007)
Lang, T.: Comparing website accessibility evaluation methods and learnings from usability evaluation methods (Visited May 2008) (2003), http://www.peakusability.com.au/about-us/pdf/website_accessibility.pdf
Mankoff, J., Fait, H., Tran, T.: Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In: CHI 2005: Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 41–50. ACM, New York (2005)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)
Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation (2002) (Visited January 2008), http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
Nielsen Norman Group. Beyond ALT Text: Making the Web Easy to Use for Users with Disabilities (October 2001), http://www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/
Nielsen Norman Group. Web usability for senior citizens (April 2002), http://www.nngroup.com/reports
Petrie, H., Kheir, O.: The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In: Proc. CHI 2007, pp. 397–406. ACM, CA (2007)
Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., Pavan, P.: Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In: CHI 2006: Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1133–1141. ACM, New York (2006)
Rubin, J.: Handbook of usability testing. Wiley, Technical Communication Library, Chichester (1994)
Sears, A.: Heuristic walkthroughs: finding the problems without the noise. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 9(3), 213–234 (1997)
Slatin, J., Lewis, K.: Challenges of accessible web design: Standards, guidelines, and user testing. In: Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, Los Angeles, USA. CSUN, California State University Northridge (2002)
Slatin, J., Rush, S.: Maximum Accessibility: Making Your Web Site More Usable for Everyone. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Thatcher, J., Waddell, C., Henry, S., Swierenga, S., Urban, M., Burks, M., Regan, B., Bohman, P.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshouse (2002)
Thatcher, J., Burks, M., Heilmann, C., Henry, S., Kirkpatrick, A., Lauke, P., Lawson, B., Regan, B., Rutter, R., Urban, M., Waddell, C.: Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance (2006); Friends of ED
Theofanos, M.F., Redish, J.: Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. Interactions 10(6), 36–51 (2003)
Thevenin, D., Coutaz, J.: Plasticity of user interfaces: framework and research agenda. In: Sasse, A., Johnson, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Interact 1999, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 110–117 (1999)
U.S. Dept. of Justice. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (2001), www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm
U.S. Government. SEC. 508. ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1998 Amendment to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, (1998) (Visited May 2008), www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=14
Vigo, M., Kobsa, A., Arrue, M., Abascal, J.: User-tailored web accessibility evaluations. In: HyperText 2007, Manchester, UK, September 2007, pp. 95–104. ACM, New York (2007)
W3C/WAI. Conformance evaluation of web sites for accessibility (2008)(Visited May 2008), www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html
W3C/WAI. How people with disabilities use the web. World Wide Web Consortium — Web Accessibility Initiative (March 2004) (Visited May 2008), http://w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/20040302.html
W3C/WAI. Web accessibility evaluation tools: Overview. World Wide Web Consortium — Web Accessibility Initiative (2006) (Visited May 2008), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/Overview.html
W3C/WAI. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium — Web Accessibility Initiative (May 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10
W3C/WAI. Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0 — w3c candidate recommendation 30 april 2008. World Wide Web Consortium — Web Accessibility Initiative (April 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-WCAG20-20080430
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brajnik, G. (2008). Beyond Conformance: The Role of Accessibility Evaluation Methods. In: Hartmann, S., Zhou, X., Kirchberg, M. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2008 Workshops. WISE 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85199-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85200-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)