Abstract
This paper deals with the adaptive capacity of geographical clusters (GCs), that is a relevant topic in the literature. To address this topic, GC is considered as a complex adaptive system (CAS). Three theoretical propositions concerning the GC adaptive capacity are formulated by using complexity theory. First, we identify three main properties of CAS s that affect the adaptive capacity, namely the interconnectivity, the heterogeneity, and the level of control, and define how the value of these properties influence the adaptive capacity. Then, we associate these properties with specific GC characteristics so obtaining the key conditions of GCs that give them the adaptive capacity so assuring their competitive advantage. To test these theoretical propositions, a case study on two real GCs is carried out. The considered GCs are modeled as networks where firms are nodes and inter-firms relationships are links. Heterogeneity, interconnectivity, and level of control are considered as network properties and thus measured by using the methods of the network theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Albino, V., Carbonara, N., & Giannoccaro, I., 2005, Industrial districts as complex adaptive systems: Agent-based models of emergent phenomena, in Industrial Clusters and Inter-Firm Networks, edit by Karlsson, C., Johansson, B., & Stough, R., Edward Elgar Publishing, 73–82.
Allen, P. M., 2001, A complex systems approach to learning, adaptive networks. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 149–180.
Ashby, W.R., 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall (London).
Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M.D., 1999, Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier, The Free Press (New York).
Borgatti, S.P., & Everett, M.G, 1999, Models of core/periphery structures, Social Networks, 21: 375–395.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C., 2002, UCINET 6 for Windows, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Buckley, P.J., Christopher, L.P., & Prescott, K., 1988, Measures of International Competitiveness: A critical survey. Journal of Marketing Management, 4 (2), 175–200.
Carbonara, N., Giannoccaro I., & Pontrandolfo P., 2002, Supply chains within industrial districts: a theoretical framework, International Journal of Production Economics, 76 (2), 159–176.
Carzo, R., & Yanousas, J. N., 1969, Effects of flat and tall structure, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 178 191.
Cowan, G. A., Pines, D., & Meltzer, D. (eds.), 1994, Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality, Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute, Vol. XIX. Addison-Wesley (Reading, MA).
Dooley, K.J., 2002, Organizational Complexity, in International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, edit by M. Warner, Thompson Learning (London).
Gell-Mann, M., 1994, The quark and the jaguar, Freeman & Co (New York).
Giuliani, E., 2005, The structure of cluster knowledge networks: uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective, Working Papers, Copenhagen Business School.
Grant, R.M., 1998, Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Concepts, Techniques, Applications, Blackwell (Oxford).
Jones, G.R., 2000, Organizational Theory, Addison-Wesley (Reading, MA).
Kauffman, S.A., 1993, The Origins of Orders: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press (New York/Oxford).
Kauffman, S.A., 1995, At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity, Oxford University Press (New York).
Krugman, P.R., 1991, Geography and Trade, MIT Press (Cambridge, MA).
Le Moigne, J. L., 1990, La Modélisation des Systèmes Complexes, Dunod (Paris).
LeBaron, B., 2001, Financial market efficiency in a coevolutionary environment. Proceedings of the Workshop on Simulation of Social Agents: Architectures and Institutions, Argonne National Laboratory and The University of Chicago, 33–51.
Levy, D.L., 2000, Applications and Limitations of Complexity Theory in Organization Theory and Strategy, in Handbook of Strategic Management, edit by Rabin, J., Miller, G. J., & Hildreth, W.B., Marcel Dekker (New York).
Marshall, A., 1920, Principles of Economics, Macmillan (London).
McKelvey, B., 2004, Toward a 0th Law of Thermodynamics: Order Creation Complexity Dynamics from Physics and Biology to Bioeconomics, Journal of Bioeconomics, 6, 65–96.
Piore, M., & Sabel, C.F., 1984, The Second Industrial Divide, Basic Books (New York).
Porter, M., 1998, Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
Rivkin, J.W., & Siggelkovv, N.J., 2002, Organizational Sticking Points on NK Landscape, Complexity, 7 (5), 31–43.
Scott, J., 1991, Social network analysis, Sage (London).
Simon, H.A., 1996, The sciences of the artificial, MIT Press (Cambridge, MA).
Yin, R., 1989, Case Study research: Design and methods, Sage (Newbury Park, CA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Albino, V., Carbonara, N., Giannoccaro, I. (2010). Adaptive capacity of geographical clusters: Complexity science and network theory approach. In: Minai, A., Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85081-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85081-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85080-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85081-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)