Skip to main content

Inferring a Possibility Distribution from Very Few Measurements

  • Conference paper
Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 48))

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of the possibility representation of measurement uncertainty in the cases of information shortage: very few measurements, poor knowledge about the underlying probability distribution. After having related possibility distribution to probability confidence intervals, we present a procedure to build a possibility distribution for one measurement issued from an unimodal probability distribution. We consider then the addition of other measurements and more knowledge about the probability distribution. The key role of the uniform distribution as the probability distribution leading to the least specific possibility distribution is highlighted. The approach is compared and discussed versus the conventional one based on the Student distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anděl, J.: Confidence intervals for the mode based on one observation. Zb Rad. 5, 87–96 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baudrit, C., Dubois, D.: Practical representation of incomplete probabilistic information. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 51(1), 86–108 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Fodor, J.C., Prade, H., Roubens, M.: Aggregation of decomposable measures with applications to utility theory. Theory and Decision 41(1), 195–223 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., Prade, H.: Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets and probabilistic inequalities. Reliab. Comput. 10(4), 273–297 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence. In: Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E. (eds.) Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, pp. 167–181. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sandri, S.: On possibility/probability transformations. In: Lowen, R., Roubens, M. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic, pp. 103–112 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrero, A., Salicone, S.: The random-fuzzy variables: a new approach to the expression of uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 53(5), 1370–1377 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO-IEC-OIML-BIPM, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 2nd edn. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kendall, M., Stuart, A.: The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 1. Charles Griffin, London (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Machol, R.E., Rosenblatt, J.: Confidence interval based on single observation. Proceedings of IEEE 54(8), 1087–1088 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mari, L., Zingales, G.: Uncertainty in measurement science. In: Proceedings of the Int. Workshop on Advances of Measurement Science (Kyoto, Japan), pp. 177–189 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mauris, G., Lasserre, V., Foulloy, L.: Fuzzy modeling of measurement data acquired from physical sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 49(6), 1201–1205 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mauris, G., Lasserre, V., Foulloy, L.: A fuzzy approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Measurement 29(3), 165–177 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, R.: Interval Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1966)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Moral, M.: Constructing of possibility distribution from a probability distribution. In: Jones, A., Kauffmann, A., Zimmermann, H.J. (eds.) Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications, pp. 51–60 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reznik, L., Dabke, K.P.: Evaluation of uncertainty in measurement: a proposal for application of intelligent methods. In: Proceedings of the XV IMEKO World Congress (Osaka, Japan), vol. II, pp. 93–100 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Urbanski, M., Wasowski, J.: Fuzzy approach to the theory of measurement inexactness. Measurement 34, 67–74 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(1), 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mauris, G. (2008). Inferring a Possibility Distribution from Very Few Measurements. In: Dubois, D., Lubiano, M.A., Prade, H., Gil, M.Á., Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. (eds) Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 48. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85027-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85027-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85026-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85027-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics